Abstract
How agencies perceive, process, and prioritize multiple (potentially conflicting) audiences’ expectations of components of their reputations is a core interest of bureaucratic reputation theorists. Agencies must choose which dimension(s) to stress towards specific audiences, a process referred to as ‘prioritizing’. Boon, Salomonsen, Verhoest, and Pedersen challenge a central argument of contemporary bureaucratic reputation theory, namely that prioritizing assumes government agencies to be rational, politically conscious organizations with incentives to avoid reputational damages and political sanctions. The chapter tests the claim that agency behaviour is (at least to some extent) driven by the distinctive logic of the media rather than by assessments of the relative strength of different dimensions of an agency’s reputation that are subjected to threats, or by the nature of the agency’s task.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altheide, D. L. (2004). Media logic and political communication. Political Communication, 21(3), 293–296.
Arnold, R. D. (2004). Congress, the press, and political accountability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bovens, M. A. P. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.
Busuioc, M., & Lodge, M. (2017). Reputation and accountability relationships: Managing accountability expectations through reputation. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 91–100.
Carpenter, D. P. (2002). Groups, the media, agency waiting costs, and FDA drug approval. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 490–505.
Carpenter, D. P. (2004). Protection without capture: Product approval by a politically responsive, learning regulator. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 613–631.
Carpenter, D. P. (2010). Reputation and power: Organizational image and pharmaceutical regulation at the FDA. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Carpenter, D. P., Chattopadhyay, J., Moffitt, S., & Nall, C. (2012). The complications of controlling agency time discretion: FDA review deadlines and postmarket drug safety. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 98–114.
Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and public administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32.
Carroll, C. E., & McCombs, M. (2003). Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public’s images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 36–46.
Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2001). An extended examination of the crisis situations: A fusion of the relational management and symbolic approaches. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(4), 321–340.
Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2006). Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management, 10(2), 123–137.
Deacon, D., & Monk, W. (2001). ‘New managerialism’ in the news: Media coverage of Quangos in Britain. Journal of Public Affairs, 1(2), 153–166.
Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112.
Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2017). Organizational crisis communication. London: Sage.
Fredriksson, M., Schillemans, T., & Pallas, J. (2015). Determinants of organizational mediatization: An analysis of the adaptation of Swedish government agencies to news media. Public Administration, 93(4), 1049–1067.
Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90.
Gilad, S., Maor, M., & Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2015). Organizational reputation, the content of public allegations, and regulatory communication. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 451–478.
Goodsell, C. T. (1989). Balancing competing values. In J. Perry (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 575–584). New York: Jossey-Bass.
Hjarvard, S. P. (2013). The mediatization of society and culture. London: Routledge.
Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Luoma-aho, V. (2007). Neutral reputation and public sector organizations. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(2), 124–143.
Maggetti, M., & Verhoest, K. (2014). Unexplored aspects of bureaucratic autonomy: A state of the field and ways forward. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(2), 239–256.
Maor, M. (2011). Organizational reputations and the observability of public warnings in 10 pharmaceutical markets. Governance, 24(3), 557–582.
Maor, M. (2015). Theorizing bureaucratic reputation. In A. Wæraas & M. Maor (Eds.), Organizational reputation in the public sector (pp. 17–36). London: Routledge.
Maor, M. (2016). Missing areas in the bureaucratic reputation framework. Politics and Governance, 4(2), 80–90.
Maor, M., Gilad, S., & Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2013). Organizational reputation, regulatory talk, and strategic silence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(3), 581–608.
Maor, M., & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2016). Responsive change: Agency output response to reputational threats. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 31–44.
Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). ‘Mediatization’ of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261.
McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Oxford: Polity Press.
Moffitt, S. L. (2010). Promoting agency reputation through public advice: Advisory committee use in the FDA. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 880–893.
Pallas, J., Fredriksson, M., & Wedlin, L. (2016). Translating institutional logics: When the media logic meets professions. Organization Studies, 37(11), 1661–1684.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform, a comparative analysis: New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J., & Smullen, A. (2004). Agencies: How governments do things through semi-autonomous organization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rolland, V. W., & Roness, P. G. (2010). Mapping organizational units in the state: Challenges and classifications. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(10), 463–473.
Schillemans, T. (2012). Mediatization of public services: How organizations adapt to news media. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Towards a theoretical framework. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies (pp. 3–28). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thorbjørnsrud, K. (2015). Mediatization of public bureaucracies: Administrative versus political loyalty. Scandinavian Political Studies, 38(2), 179–197.
Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2012). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 203–220.
Verhoest, K., Rommel, J., & Boon, J. (2015). How organizational reputation and trust may affect autonomy of independent regulators: The case of the Flemish energy regulator. In A. Wæraas & M. Maor (Eds.), Organizational reputation in the public sector (pp. 118–138). London: Routledge.
Verhoest, K., Van Thiel, S., Bouckaert, G., & Lægreid, P. (Eds.). (2012). Government agencies: Practices and lessons from 30 countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Verhoest, K., Verschuere, B., & Bouckaert, G. (2007). Pressure, legitimacy, and innovative behavior by public organizations. Governance, 20(3), 469–497.
Wæraas, A., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2012). Public sector organizations and reputation management: Five problems. International Public Management Journal, 15(2), 186–206.
Wæraas, A., & Maor, M. (2015). Understanding organizational reputation in a public sector context. In A. Wæraas & M. Maor (Eds.), Organizational reputation in the public sector (pp. 1–13). London: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
We thank Stefan Boye for his help with the statistical analyses for this chapter. We also thank Martin Moos for collecting the data. The research is part of the Rep Gov project, funded by the Danish Reserach Council for Independent Reserach.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boon, J., Salomonsen, H.H., Verhoest, K., Pedersen, M.Ø. (2019). Media and Bureaucratic Reputation: Exploring Media Biases in the Coverage of Public Agencies. In: Bach, T., Wegrich, K. (eds) The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non-Coordination. Executive Politics and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76672-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76672-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76671-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76672-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)