Skip to main content

Supply Chain Risk Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supply Chain Finance

Part of the book series: EURO Advanced Tutorials on Operational Research ((EUROATOR))

Abstract

In this chapter, we introduce concepts and techniques of operational hedging in SCRM (supply chain risk management) that are used to match the supply with demand of material flows. First, we present a conceptual framework of supply chain risk management, after which we propose a classification of operational hedging based on our description of each operational strategy. We then examine representative analytical models of SCRM and give numerical examples. Finally, we discuss the empirical research on SCRM and provide some illustrative mini-cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aydın, G., Babich, V., Beil, D. R., & Yang, Z. (2012). Decentralized supply risk management. In: Kouvelis, P., Boyabatli, O., Dong, L., & Li, R. (Eds.), Handbook of integrated risk management in global supply chains (389–424). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babich, V., Burnetas, A. N., & Ritchken, P. H. (2007). Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9, 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blome, C., & Henkel, M. (2009). Single versus multiple sourcing: A supply risk management perspective. In Zsidisin, G. A., & Ritchie, B. (Eds.), Supply chain risk a handbook of assessment, management, and performance. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. In Graves, S., de Kok, T. (Eds.), Handbooks in operations research and management science: Supply chain management (pp. 229–340). North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. In Graves, S., de Kok, T. (Eds.), Handbooks in operations research and management science: Supply chain management (pp. 341–422). North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chod, J., & Rudi, N. (2005). Resource flexibility with responsive pricing. Operations Research, 53(3), 532–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (1992). Logistics and supply chain management. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dada, M., Petruzzi, N. C., & Schwarz, L. B. (2007). A newsvendor’s procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9, 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Q., Dong, L., & Kouvelis, P. (2007). On the integration of production and financial hedging decisions in global markets. Operations Research, 55, 470–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, K. (2000). Efficient supply contracts for fashion goods with forecast updating and two production modes. Management Science, 46, 1397–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, R., & Kamrad, B. (2000). Evaluation of supply chain structures through modularization and postponement. European Journal of Operational Research, 124, 495–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M., & Raman, A. (1996). Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response. Operations Research, 44, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froot, K. A., Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1993). Risk management: Coordinating corporate investment and financing policies. Journal of Finance, 48, 1629–1658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamba, A., & Triantis, A. J. (2014). Corporate risk management: Integrating liquidity, hedging, and operating policies. Management Science, 60, 246–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guide, V. D. R., Jr., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2009). The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Operations Research, 57, 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huchzermeier, A., & Cohen, M. A. (1996). Valuing operational flexibility under exchange rate risk. Operations Research, 44, 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazaz, B., Dada, M., & Moskowitz, H. (2005). Global production planning under exchange-rate uncertainty. Management Science, 51, 1101–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-H., Cohen, M., & Netessine, S. (2007). Performance contracting in after-sales service supply chains. Management Science, 53, 1843–1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouvelis, P. (1999). Global sourcing strategies under exchange rate uncertainty. In Tayur, S., Ganeshan, R., Magazine, M. (Eds.), Quantitative models for supply chain management (625–668). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouvelis, P., & Gutierrez, G. (1997). The newsvendor problem in a global market: Optimal centralized and decentralized control policies for a two-market stochastic inventory system. Management Science, 43, 571–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouvelis, P., Li, R., & Qing, D. (2013). Managing storable commodity risks: The role of inventories and financial hedge. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 15, 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, A. (2001). Trial by fire: A blaze in Albuquerque sets off major crisis for cell-phone giants. Wall Street J., January 29, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L. (1996). Effective management of inventory and service through product and process redesign. Operations Research, 44, 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L., & Tang, C. S. (1997). Modeling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation. Management Science, 43, 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. (2009). A system-optimization perspective for supply chain network integration: The horizontal merger case. Transportation Research, 45, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1989). Microeconomics. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30, 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roszkowski, M. J., & Davey, G. (2010). Risk perception and risk tolerance changes attributable to the 2008 economic crisis: A subtle but critical difference. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 64, 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sting, F. J., & Huchzermeier, A. (2010). Ensuring responsive capacity: How to contract with backup suppliers. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 725–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Internationl Journal of Production Economics, 103, 451–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, B. (2006). On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science, 52, 639–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, B., & Wang, Y. (2005). On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 7, 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Mieghem, J. A. (2007). Risk mitigation in newsvendor networks: Resource diversification, flexibility, sharing, and hedging. Management Science, 53, 1269–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Mieghem, J. A. (2012). Risk management and operational hedging: An overview. In P. Kouvelis, L. Dong, O. Boyabatli, & R. Li (Eds.), Handbook of integrated risk management in global supply chains (pp. 13–49). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Mieghem, J. A., & Dada, M. (1999). Price versus production postponement: Capacity and competition. Management Science, 45, 1631–1649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, S., Calantone, R., & Dröge, C. (1999). Supply chain flexibility: An empirical study. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35, 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Gilland, W., & Tomlin, B. (2010). Mitigating supply risk: Dual sourcing or process improvement? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 12, 489–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Aydin, G., Babich, V., & Beil, D. (2009). Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Management Science, 55, 192–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. A. (2005). Approaches for managing price volatility. In 5th International Research Seminar on Risk and the Supply Chain. Centre for Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Management, Cranfield University, 12th September 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lima Zhao .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhao, L., Huchzermeier, A. (2018). Supply Chain Risk Management. In: Supply Chain Finance. EURO Advanced Tutorials on Operational Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76663-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics