Commuting and Happiness: What Ways Feel Best for What Kinds of People?

Chapter
Part of the Applying Quality of Life Research book series (BEPR)

Abstract

How happy we are, depends partly on how we live our life and part of our way of life is how we commute between home and work. In that context, we are faced with the question of how much time spent on commuting is optimal happiness wise and with what means of transportation we will feel best. Decisions about commuting are typically made as a side issue in job choice and there are indications that we are bad in predicting how such decisions will work out on our happiness in the long-run. For that reason, it is helpful to know how commuting has worked out on the happiness of other people and on people like you in particular. Several cross-sectional studies found lower happiness among long-distance commuters and among users of public transportation. Yet these differences could be due to selection effects, such as unhappy people opting more often for distant jobs without having a car. Still another limitation is that earlier research has focused on the average effect of commuting, rather than specifying what is optimal for whom. Data of the Dutch ‘Happiness Indicator’ study was analyzed, in the context of which 5000 participants recorded what they had done in the previous day and how happy they had felt during these activities. This data allows comparison between how the same person feels at home and during commute, which eliminates selection effects. The number of participants is large enough to allow a split-up between different kinds of people, in particular among the many well-educated women who participated in this study. People feel typically less happy when commuting than at home, and that the negative difference is largest when commuting with public transportation and smallest when commuting by bike. It is not per se the commuting time that causes happiness loss, but specific combinations of commuting time and commuting mode. Increasing commuting times can even lead to a gain in happiness for certain types of women, when the commute is by bike. Split-up by different kinds of people shows considerable differences, such as an optimal commute alone or even by public transport for some highly educated women. Optimal ways of commuting for different kinds of people are presented in a summary table, from which individuals can read what will fit them best. The differences illustrate that research focusing on average effects of happiness will not help individuals in making a more informed choice.

Keywords

Happiness Hedonic level of affect Mood during commute Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) 

References

  1. Abou-Zeid, M., Witter, R., Bierlaire, M., Kaufmann, V., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2012). Happiness and travel mode switching: Findings from a Swiss public transportation experiment. Transport Policy, 19(1), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ANWB. (2015). Dagelijkse drukke trajecten ochtend en avondspits. [online]. Available at: http://www.anwb.nl/verkeer/nederland/verkeersinformatie/dagelijkse-drukke-trajecten. Accessed 10 June 2015.
  3. Chng, S., White, M., Abraham, C., & Skippon, S. (2016). Commuting and wellbeing in London: The roles of commute mode and local public transport connectivity. Preventive Medicine, 88(1), 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. P. (2006). Review of research on the influences on personal well-being and application to policy making. Report for Defra, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Duarte, A., Garcia, C., Giannarakis, G., Limão, S., Polydoropoulou, A., & Litinas, N. (2010). New approaches in transportation planning: Happiness and transport economics. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 11(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ettema, D., & Smajic, I. (2014). Walking, places and wellbeing. The Geographical Journal, 181(2),  https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L. E., & Fujii, S. (2011). Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: Development and test of a measurement tool. Journal of Transportation Research Part F, 14, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E., & Fujii, S. (2012). How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. Journal of Transport Geography.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.02.007.
  9. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, XL, 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2014). Economic consequences of mispredicting utility. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 937–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friman, M., Fujii, S., Ettema, D., Gärling, T., & Olsson, L. E. (2013). Psychometric analysis of the satisfaction with travel scale. Transportation Research Part A, 48, 132–145.Google Scholar
  12. Furnham, A., & Cheng, H. (1999). Personality as predictor of mental health and happiness in East and West. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2007). Affective appraisals of the daily commute: comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclists, walkers, and users of public transport. Environment and Behavior, 39(3), 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gelukswijzer: Gereedschap voor werken aan geluk. (2011). Erasmus University Rotterdam, Happiness Economics Research Organization. Available at: https://www.gelukswijzer.nl
  15. Happiness Indicator. (2016). Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus Happiness Economics Research Organization EHERO. Available at: http://happinessindicator.com
  16. Juster, F. T., & Stafford, F. P. (1991). The allocation of time: Empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(2), 471–522.Google Scholar
  17. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2003). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The Day Reconstruction Method (DRM). Mimeo, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  18. Koslowsky, M., Kluger, A. M., & Reich, M. (1995). Commuting stress: Causes, effects, and methods of coping. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lancee, S., Burger, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2017). Mood during commute in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A, 104C(2017), 195–208.Google Scholar
  20. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons of a new science. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). The how of happiness: A scientific approach to getting the life that you want. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (2001). How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(8), 695–719.Google Scholar
  24. Morris, E. A., & Guerra, E. (2015). Mood and mode: Does how we travel affect how we feel? Transportation, 42(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. NS. (2015). Wat zijn daluren? Available at: http://www.ns.nl/reizigers/klantenservice/klantenservice/voorwaardenenfolders/daluren.html. [Accessed 10 Jun. 2015].
  26. Olsson, L. E., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., & Fujii, S. (2013). Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Social Indicators Research, 111(1), 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ONS. (2014). Commuting and personal well-being. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  28. Pfaff, S. (2014). Pendelenfernung, Lebenszufriedenheit und Entlohnung: Eine Längsschnittuntersuchung mit den Daten des SOEP von 1998 bis 2009. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 43, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of the American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roberts, J., Hodgson, R., & Dolan, P. (2011). “It’s driving her mad”: Gender differences in the effects of commuting on psychological health. Journal of Health Economics, 30(5), 1064–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Studer, R., & Winkelmann, R. (2011). Specification and estimation of rating scale models: With an application to the determinants of life satisfaction (SOEP Paper no. 372). Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  33. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Stress that doesn’t pay: The commuting paradox. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(2), 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Susilo, Y. O., & Maat, K. (2007). The influence of built environment to the trends in commuting journeys in the Netherlands. Transportation, 34(5), 589–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. The Happiness Indicator: A self-help website and a scientific follow-up study. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Happiness Economics Research Organization. Available at: http://happinessindicator.com.
  36. Van der Meer, P. H., & Wielers, R. (2013). What makes workers happy? Applied Economics, 45(357), 368.Google Scholar
  37. Van Wee, B., Rietveld, P., & Meurs, H. (2006). Is average daily travel time expenditure constant? In search of explanations for an increase in average travel time. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Veenhoven, R. (2009). How do we assess how happy we are? Tenets, implications and tenability of three theories. In A. Dutt & B. Radcliff (Eds.), Happiness, economics and politics: Towards a multi-disciplinary approach (1st ed., pp. 45–69). Cheltenham: Edward Elger Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Veenhoven, R. (2012). Cross-national differences in happiness: Cultural measurement bias or effect of culture? International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(4), 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veenhoven, R. (2015a). Distributional findings on happiness in nations. World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. [Online]. Available at: http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl. Accessed 21 July 2015.
  42. Veenhoven, R. (2015b). Happiness in Netherlands (NL). World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. [Online]. Available at: http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl. Accessed 21 July 2015.
  43. Veenhoven, R. (2015c). Evidence based pursuit of happiness: What should we know, do we know and can we get to know? Erasmus Happiness Economics Research Organization. White paper nr. 1. Erasmus University Rotterdam. [Online]. Available at: http://www2.eur.nl/fsw/research/veenhoven/Pub2010s/2012j-full.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2015.
  44. Veenhoven, R. (2016) Happiness, history of the concept. In J. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopaedia of social and behavioural sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 10, pp. 521–525). Oxford Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sascha Lancée
    • 1
  • Martijn Burger
    • 1
  • Ruut Veenhoven
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Erasmus Happiness Economics Research Organization (EHERO)Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Opentia Research ProgramNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroomSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations