Travel and Wellbeing: Future Prospects
In this chapter, ideas and directions for future research are presented. Various interventions, as a means of counteracting mispredictions by the individual traveler and breaking travel habits, are discussed and illustrated. We elaborate upon what is known about individuals’ predictions and their accompanying thoughts about possible consequences regarding wellbeing when performing a travel mode change. It is argued that one overall goal of every transport policy should be providing sustainable travel, accompanied by sustained or increased wellbeing. The authors conclude that, while there is a vast amount of research on judgment and decision making, there is still a need for knowledge of how to aid people’s judgments as regards switching to sustainable alternatives. Specifically, researchers are urged to unveil how to prevent a loss of, or support a gain in, wellbeing when switching to sustainable travel.
KeywordsDaily travel Sustainable travel Travel behaviour change Travel Wellbeing Interventions Wellbeing consequences Decision making
Financial support provided to Margareta Friman and Lars E Olsson for their work on this chapter was obtained through grant #2014-05335 from the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems.
- Gärling, T., Bamberg, S., & Friman, M. (2017). The role of attitude in choice of travel, satisfaction with travel, and change to sustainable travel. In D. Albarracin & B. T. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Applications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Litman, T. (2015). Evaluating public transit benefits and costs. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.Google Scholar
- Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). Travel as a desired end, not just a means. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2–3), 93–96.Google Scholar
- Office for National Statistics. (2014). Commuting and personal well-being. Washington, DC: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
- Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1984). Self change processes, self efficacy and decisional balance across five stages of smoking cessation. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research, 156, 131.Google Scholar
- Redding, C. A., Mundorf, N., Kobayashi, H., Brick, L., Horiuchi, S., Paiva, A. L., & Prochaska, J. O. (2015). Sustainable transportation stage of change, decisional balance, and self-efficacy scale development and validation in two university samples. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 25(3), 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stanley, J. K., Hensher, D. A., Stanley, J. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. (2011). Mobility, social exclusion and well-being: Exploring the links. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(8), 789–801.Google Scholar
- Steg, L. (2005). Car use: Lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2), 147–162.Google Scholar
- Ubel, P. A., Loewenstein, G., & Jepson, C. (2005). Disability and sunshine: Can hedonic predictions be improved by drawing attention to focusing illusions or emotional adaptation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(2), 111.Google Scholar