Skip to main content

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

  • 448 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the contribution of the book with specific attention to the most relevant theoretical and empirical results. From a theoretical perspective, the book contributes to the effort recently undertaken by a number of scholars to theorize and analyse the engagement of EU member states and institutions to integrated practices in foreign and security policy. From an empirical point of view, the volume determines and explains the logic of variations in EU member states and institutions’ engagement to integrated modes of governance through an analysis of the role of the High Representative (HR) in leading EU foreign and security policy. In normative terms, the volume indicates the democratic unaccountability of the EU foreign and security policy-making system. Recent political developments and their implications are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (Eds.). (2015). International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. (2017, June 19). Europe’s three crises. EuVisions. Available from http://www.euvisions.eu/europes-three-crises/.

  • de Haldevang, M., & Petzinger, J. (2017, November 15). Catalyzed by Trump and Brexit, the EU’s 23-army defense pact is unlikely to enhance security. Quartz. Available from https://qz.com/1128999/eu-army-the-brexit-and-trump-effect-and-what-it-means-for-european-security/.

  • Duke, S. (2017). Europe as a Stronger Global Actor. Challenges and Strategic Responses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrini, S. (2014). The European Union and the Libyan crisis. International Politics, 51(2), 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2015a). Which European Union? Europe After the Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2015b). The constitutional conundrum of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(1), 84–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2017). Sdoppiamento. Una prospettiva nuova per l’Europa. Roma-Bari: La Terza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, J. E. (2015). Democracy and differentiation in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 799–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, N., & Walter-Franke, M. (2017, July 19). France and Germany: Spearheading a European security and defence union? Jaques Delors Institute, Policy Paper. Available from http://www.delorsinstitut.de/2015/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/20170719_FR-D-EU-Security_Koenig-Walter.pdf.

  • Lake, D., & Powell, R. (1999). Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (2014). Rethinking the Union of Europe Post-crisis: Has Integration Gone Too Far? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrone, A. (2017, November 26). Permanent structured cooperation: An institutional pathway for European Defence. Istituto Affari Internazionali, Commentaries. Available from http://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/permanent-structured-cooperation-institutional-pathway-european-defence.

  • Rittberger, B., Leuffen, D., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2013). Differentiated integration of core state powers. In P. Genschel & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Regulatory or Federal? The European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2014). Differentiated integration before and after the crisis. In O. Cramme & S. B. Hobolt (Eds.), Democratic Politics in a European Union Under Stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F., Leuffen, D., & Rittberger, B. (2015). The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: Interdependence, politicization and differentiation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 764–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubb, A. C. J. (1996). A categorization of differentiated integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(2), 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tocci, N. (2017, August). The time for European Defence has come: Rome must step up to the task. Istituto Affari Internazionali. Available from http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaicom1707.pdf.

  • Weiler, J. (1991). The transformation of Europe. The Yale Law Journal, 100(8), 2403–2483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Giulia Amadio Viceré .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Amadio Viceré, M.G. (2018). Conclusions. In: The High Representative and EU Foreign Policy Integration. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76614-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics