Nurse Led Interventions in Hypertension

  • Christopher E. ClarkEmail author
Part of the Updates in Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection book series (UHCP)


Hypertension is predominantly detected and managed in primary or community care settings. Nurses are key members of the multidisciplinary primary care team and are commonly involved in measuring or managing blood pressure. Nurses undertake a range of tasks in hypertension care and many randomised controlled trials of different nurse led interventions have been conducted, providing evidence from different populations. There is good evidence to support better blood pressure outcomes when nurses deliver care face to face, but not remotely. Other important components of these complex interventions appear to be the inclusion of a structured care algorithm, ability to prescribe or alter medications, and maintaining contact at least monthly until blood pressure is controlled to target. There is limited reporting of the costs of interventions and evidence for cost-effectiveness of nurse led care compared to usual care is lacking. There is no clear evidence from longer term follow-up of the effect of nurse led interventions on cardiovascular outcomes. The design of programmes for nurse led care in hypertension should take account of the existing evidence and areas of uncertainty. Nurses generally work within teams and future studies of team approaches to hypertension, either including or led by nurses, are needed. Any future studies of nurse led care should include a robust cost-effectiveness analysis.


Hypertension Management of hypertension Allied health professional Randomised controlled trials 



The analyses presented are based on data collected for our Cochrane review: Allied health professional led interventions for improving control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension (A115). The review has been submitted and publication is anticipated during 2018. I thank my co-authors for their contributions to the review: Lyne Cloutier, Shweta Todkar, Judit Konya, Olivia Clark, Sinead McDonagh, Lindsay Smith, Liam Glynn, Rod Taylor and John Campbell. Disclosure: Christopher Clark is supported by a National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Lectureship award. The views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the NHS or the Department of Health.


  1. 1.
    Naghavi M, Wang HD, Lozano R, et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):117–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365(9455):217–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Centre for Social Research. Health survey for England: 2010. Department of, Epidemiology & Public Health. U. C. L. Medical School: NHS Information Centre for health and social care; 2012.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kringos D, Boerma W, Bourgueil Y, et al. The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(616):e742–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bodenheimer T, Pham HH. Primary care: current problems and proposed solutions. Health Aff. 2010;29(5):799–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hobbs FD, Bankhead C, Mukhtar T, et al. Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007-14. Lancet. 2016;387(10035):2323–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laurant M, Reeves D, Hermens R, Braspenning J, Grol R, Sibbald B. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):Cd001271.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Law MR, Morris JK, Wald NJ. Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. BMJ. 2009;338:b1665.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Falaschetti E, Mindell J, Knott C, Poulter N. Hypertension management in England: a serial cross-sectional study from 1994 to 2011. Lancet. 2014;383(9932):1912–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281–357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alanen S, Ijas J, Kaila M, Makela M, Valimaki M. Hypertension guideline implementation: experiences of Finnish primary care nurses. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(5):830–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goodwin JS, Kuo Y. Growth of nurse practitioners as primary care providers for the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:S4–5.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lovink MH, Persoon A, Koopmans RT, Van Vught AJ, Schoonhoven L, Laurant MG. Effects of substituting nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nurses for physicians concerning healthcare for the ageing population: a systematic literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(9):2084–102.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Logan AG, Milne BJ, Achber C, Campbell WP, Haynes RB. Work-site treatment of hypertension by specially trained nurses. A controlled trial. Lancet. 1979;2(8153):1175–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jewell D, Hope J. Evaluation of a nurse-run hypertension clinic in general practice. Practitioner. 1988;232(1447):484–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robson J, Boomla K, Fitzpatrick S, et al. Using nurses for preventive activities with computer assisted follow up: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1989;298(6671):433–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glynn LG, Murphy AW, Smith SM, Schroeder K, Fahey T. Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(3):CD005182. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clark CE, Smith LFP, Taylor RS, Campbell JL. Nurse led interventions to improve control of blood pressure in people with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c3995.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mejzner N, Clark CE, Smith LF, Campbell JL. Trends in the diagnosis and management of hypertension: repeated primary care survey in South West England. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67(658):e306–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Potthoff SA, Vonend O. Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of resistant hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017;19(1):9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clark CE, Horvath IA, Taylor RS, Campbell JL. Doctors record higher blood pressures than nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(621):e223–32. Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mancia G, Parati G, Pomidossi G, Grassi G, Casadei R, Zanchetti A. Alerting reaction and rise in blood pressure during measurement by physician and nurse. Hypertension. 1987;9(2):209–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bengtson A, Drevenhorn E. The nurse’s role and skills in hypertension care: a review. Clin Nurse Spec. 2003;17(5):260–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Clark CE, Smith LFP, Glynn L, Taylor RS, Campbell JL. Allied health professional-led interventions for improving control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension [Protocol]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brennan T, Spettell C, Villagra V, et al. Disease management to promote blood pressure control among African Americans. Popul Health Manag. 2010;13:65–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Contreras EM, Garcia OV, Claros NM, et al. Efficacy of telephone and mail intervention in patient compliance with antihypertensive drugs in hypertension. ETECUM-HTA study. Blood Press. 2005;14(0803-7051 (Print), 0803-7051 (Linking), 3):151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Janssen PG, Gorter KJ, Stolk RP, Rutten GE. Randomised controlled trial of intensive multifactorial treatment for cardiovascular risk in patients with screen-detected type 2 diabetes: 1-year data from the ADDITION Netherlands study. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(558):43–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Odnoletkova I, Goderis G, Nobels F, et al. Optimizing diabetes control in people with Type 2 diabetes through nurse-led telecoaching. Diabet Med. 2016;33(6):777–85.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dean SC, Kerry SM, Khong TK, Kerry SR, Oakeshott P. Evaluation of a specialist nurse-led hypertension clinic with consultant backup in two inner city general practices: randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract. 2014;31(2):172–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khalid A, Shan W, David C, et al. Experience from a pilot study of a nurse-led hypertension clinic in general practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:1239–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ester AG, Enriqueta PR, Valeria PH, et al. Knowledge and adherence to antihypertensive therapy in primary care: results of a randomized trial. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2011;25:62–7.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bebb C, Kendrick D, Coupland C, et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial of the effect of a treatment algorithm for hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(535):136–43.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bogner HR, de Vries HF, Kaye EM, Morales KH. Pilot trial of a licensed practical nurse intervention for hypertension and depression. Fam Med. 2013;45(5):323–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bosworth HB, Olsen MK, Dudley T, et al. Patient education and provider decision support to control blood pressure in primary care: a cluster randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2009;157:450–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bosworth HB, Olsen MK, Grubber JM, et al. Two self-management interventions to improve hypertension control: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:687–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chiu CW, Wong FK. Effects of 8 weeks sustained follow-up after a nurse consultation on hypertension: a randomised trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47:1374–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Crowley MJ, Powers BJ, Olsen MK, et al. The cholesterol, hypertension, and glucose education (CHANGE) study: results from a randomized controlled trial in African Americans with diabetes. Am Heart J. 2013;166:179–86.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Edelman D, Dolor RJ, Coffman CJ, et al. Nurse-led behavioral management of diabetes and hypertension in community practices: a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(5):626–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jolly K, Bradley F, Sharp S, et al. Randomised controlled trial of follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina: final results of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). The SHIP Collaborative Group. BMJ. 1999;318(7185):706–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kastarinen MJ, Puska PM, Korhonen MH, et al. Non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension in primary health care: a 2-year open randomized controlled trial of lifestyle intervention against hypertension in eastern Finland. J Hypertens. 2002;20(0263-6352 (Print), 12):2505–12.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Moher M, Yudkin P, Wright L, et al. Cluster randomised controlled trial to compare three methods of promoting secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care. BMJ. 2001;322(0959-8138 (Print), 7298):1338.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Polgreen LA, Han J, Carter BL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a physician-pharmacist collaboration intervention to improve blood pressure control. Hypertension. 2015;66(6):1145–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rinfret S, Lussier MT, Peirce A, et al. The impact of a multidisciplinary information technology-supported program on blood pressure control in primary care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(3):170–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schroeder K, Fahey T, Hollinghurst S, Peters TJ. Nurse-led adherence support in hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract. 2005;22(2):144–51.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sen M, Rasjo Wraak G, Ronmark P, et al. Lack of long-term effects from a pedagogical intervention upon blood pressure control—a randomized primary care study. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2013;47(5):289–96.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Woollard J, Beilin L, Lord T, Puddey I, MacAdam D, Rouse I. A controlled trial of nurse counselling on lifestyle change for hypertensives treated in general practice: preliminary results. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1995;22(6–7):466–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Woollard J, Burke V, Beilin LJ. Effects of general practice-based nurse-counselling on ambulatory blood pressure and antihypertensive drug prescription in patients at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17(10):689–95.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Artinian NT, Flack JM, Nordstrom CK, et al. Effects of nurse-managed telemonitoring on blood pressure at 12-month follow-up among urban African Americans. Nurs Res. 2007;56(0029-6562 (Print), 5):312–22.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tobe SW, Pylypchuk G, Wentworth J, et al. Effect of nurse-directed hypertension treatment among First Nations people with existing hypertension and diabetes mellitus: the Diabetes Risk Evaluation and Microalbuminuria (DREAM 3) randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2006;174(1488-2329 (Electronic), 9):1267–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhu X, Wong FKY, Wu LH. Development and evaluation of a nurse-led hypertension management model in a community: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(11):4369–77.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hornnes N, Larsen K, Boysen G. Blood pressure 1 year after stroke: the need to optimize secondary prevention. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;20:16–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kerry SM, Markus HS, Khong TK, et al. Home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support among patients with hypertension and a history of stroke: a community-based randomized controlled trial. CMAJ: Can Med Assoc J. 2013;185(1):23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rudd P, Miller NH, Kaufman J, et al. Nurse management for hypertension. A systems approach. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17(10):921–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Artinian NT, Washington OG, Templin TN. Effects of home telemonitoring and community-based monitoring on blood pressure control in urban African Americans: a pilot study. Heart Lung. 2001;30(3):191–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Allen JK, Dennison Himmelfarb CR, Szanton SL, Frick KD. Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioner/community health worker care to reduce cardiovascular health disparities. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014;29(4):308–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Becker DM, Yanek LR, Johnson WR Jr, et al. Impact of a community-based multiple risk factor intervention on cardiovascular risk in black families with a history of premature coronary disease. Circulation. 2005;111(10):1298–304.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cooper J, Zimmerman W. The effect of a faith community nurse network and public health collaboration on hypertension prevention and control. Public Health Nurs (Boston, MA). 2017;34(5):444–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lee LL, Arthur A, Avis M. Evaluating a community-based walking intervention for hypertensive older people in Taiwan: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2007;44(2):160–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Denver EA, Barnard M, Woolfson RG, Earle KA. Management of uncontrolled hypertension in a nurse-led clinic compared with conventional care for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(8):2256–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    MacMahon Tone J, Agha A, Sherlock M, Finucane F, Tormey W, Thompson CJ. An intensive nurse-led, multi-interventional clinic is more successful in achieving vascular risk reduction targets than standard diabetes care. Ir J Med Sci. 2009;178:179–86.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wallymahmed ME, Morgan C, Gill GV, MacFarlane IA. Nurse-led cardiovascular risk factor intervention leads to improvements in cardiovascular risk targets and glycaemic control in people with Type-1 diabetes when compared with routine diabetes clinic attendance. Diabet Med. 2011;28(3):373–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ko GT, Li JK, Kan EC, Lo MK. Effects of a structured health education programme by a diabetic education nurse on cardiovascular risk factors in Chinese Type 2 diabetic patients: a 1-year prospective randomized study. Diabet Med. 2004;21(12):1274–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Litaker D, Mion L, Planavsky L, Kippes C, Mehta N, Frolkis J. Physician—nurse practitioner teams in chronic disease management: the impact on costs, clinical effectiveness, and patients’ perception of care. J Interprof Care. 2003;17(3):223–37.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    McHugh F, Lindsay GM, Hanlon P, et al. Nurse led shared care for patients on the waiting list for coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2001;86(1468-201X (Electronic), 3):317–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Campbell NC, Ritchie LD, Thain J, Deans HG, Rawles JM, Squair JL. Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: a randomised trial of nurse led clinics in primary care. Heart. 1998;80(5):447–52.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Mackenzie G, Ireland S, Moore S, et al. Tailored interventions to improve hypertension management after stroke or TIA—phase II (TIMS II). Can J Neurosci Nurs. 2013;35:27–34.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hebert PL, Sisk JE, Tuzzio L, et al. Nurse-led disease management for hypertension control in a diverse urban community: a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(6):630–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Alhalaiqa F, Deane KH, Nawafleh AH, Clark A, Gray R. Adherence therapy for medication non-compliant patients with hypertension: a randomised controlled trial. J Hum Hypertens. 2011;28:117–26.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Logan AG, Milne BJ, Achber C, Campbell WP, Haynes RB. Cost-effectiveness of a worksite hypertension treatment program. Hypertension. 1981;3(2):211–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Logan AG, Milne BJ, Flanagan PT, Haynes RB. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of monitoring blood pressure of hypertensive employees at work. Hypertension. 1983;5:828–36.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Allen JK, Dennison-Himmelfarb CR, Szanton SL, et al. Community Outreach and Cardiovascular Health (COACH) Trial: a randomized, controlled trial of nurse practitioner/community health worker cardiovascular disease risk reduction in urban community health centers. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4(6):595–602.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Garcia-Pena C, Thorogood M, Armstrong B, Reyes-Frausto S, Munoz O. Pragmatic randomized trial of home visits by a nurse to elderly people with hypertension in Mexico. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30(6):1485–91.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pezzin LE, Feldman PH, Mongoven JM, McDonald MV, Gerber LM, Peng TR. Improving blood pressure control: results of home-based post-acute care interventions. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:280–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Taylor CB, Miller NH, Reilly KR, et al. Evaluation of a nurse-care management system to improve outcomes in patients with complicated diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(4):1058–63.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bellary S, O’Hare JP, Raymond NT, et al. Enhanced diabetes care to patients of south Asian ethnic origin (the United Kingdom Asian Diabetes Study): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(1474-547X (Electronic), 9626):1769–76.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    New JP, Mason JM, Freemantle N, et al. Educational outreach in diabetes to encourage practice nurses to use primary care hypertension and hyperlipidaemia guidelines (EDEN): a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2004;21(6):599–603.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bosworth HB, Powers BJ, Olsen MK, et al. Home blood pressure management and improved blood pressure control: results from a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1173–80.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    New JP, Mason JM, Freemantle N, et al. Specialist nurse-led intervention to treat and control hypertension and hyperlipidemia in diabetes (SPLINT): a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(8):2250–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Attridge M, Creamer J, Ramsden M, Cannings-John R, Hawthorne K. Culturally appropriate health education for people in ethnic minority groups with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):CD006424.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hotu C, Bagg W, Collins J, et al. A community-based model of care improves blood pressure control and delays progression of proteinuria, left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction in Maori and Pacific patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(10):3260–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    O’Hare JP, Raymond NT, Mughal S, et al. Evaluation of delivery of enhanced diabetes care to patients of South Asian ethnicity: the United Kingdom Asian Diabetes Study (UKADS). Diabet Med. 2004;21(0742-3071 (Print), 12):1357–65.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Wakefield BJ, Holman JE, Ray A, et al. Effectiveness of home telehealth in comorbid diabetes and hypertension: a randomized, controlled trial. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17:254–61.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    McKee MD, Fletcher J, Sigal I, Giftos J, Schechter C, Walker EA. A collaborative approach to control hypertension in diabetes: outcomes of a pilot intervention. J Prim Care Community Health. 2011;2:148–52.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Tonstad S, Alm CS, Sandvik E. Effect of nurse counselling on metabolic risk factors in patients with mild hypertension: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007;6(2):160–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Ulm K, Huntgeburth U, Gnahn H, Briesenick C, Prner K, Middeke M. Effect of an intensive nurse-managed medical care programme on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;103:142–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Fahey T, Schroeder K, Ebrahim S. Educational and organisational interventions used to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(520):875–82.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Fahey T, Schroeder K, Ebrahim S. Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online). 2005;(1).Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Phillips LS, Branch WT, Cook CB, et al. Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(9):825–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Hines R, Stone NJ. Patients and physicians beliefs and practices regarding adherence to cardiovascular medication. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(4):470–3.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Ligthart SA, van den Eerenbeemt KD, Pols J, van Bussel EF, Richard E, Moll van Charante EP. Perspectives of older people engaging in nurse-led cardiovascular prevention programmes: a qualitative study in primary care in the Netherlands. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(630):e41–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Schroeder K, Fahey T. Improving adherence to drugs for hypertension. BMJ. 2007;335(7628):1002–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Wetzels GE, Nelemans P, Schouten JS, Prins MH. Facts and fiction of poor compliance as a cause of inadequate blood pressure control: a systematic review. J Hypertens. 2004;22(10):1849–55.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Nuesch R, Schroeder K, Dieterle T, Martina B, Battegay E. Relation between insufficient response to antihypertensive treatment and poor compliance with treatment: a prospective case-control study. BMJ. 2001;323:142–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Krousel-Wood M, Islam T, Webber LS, Re RN, Morisky DE, Muntner P. New medication adherence scale versus pharmacy fill rates in seniors with hypertension. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(1):59–66.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Gallagher BD, Muntner P, Moise N, Lin JJ, Kronish IM. Are two commonly used self-report questionnaires useful for identifying antihypertensive medication nonadherence? J Hypertens. 2015;33(5):1108–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Prado JC Jr, Kupek E, Mion D Jr. Validity of four indirect methods to measure adherence in primary care hypertensives. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21(7):579–84.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Bray EP, Holder R, Mant J, McManus RJ. Does self-monitoring reduce blood pressure? Meta-analysis with meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Ann Med. 2010;42(5):371–86.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Rogers MA, Small D, Buchan DA, et al. Home monitoring service improves mean arterial pressure in patients with essential hypertension. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(11):1024–32.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    McManus RJ, Mant J, Bray EP, et al. Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9736):163–72.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Uhlig K, Patel K, Ip S, Kitsios GD, Balk EM. Self-measured blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(3):185–94.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Cappuccio FP, Kerry SM, Forbes L, Donald A. Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2004;329(7458):145.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    McManus, RJ, et al. Efficacy of self-monitored blood pressure, with or without telemonitoring, for titration of antihypertensive medication (TASMINH4): an unmasked randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10124):949–59.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Weeks G, George J, Maclure K, Stewart D. Non-medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Jansen J, Naganathan V, Carter SM, et al. Too much medicine in older people? Deprescribing through shared decision making. BMJ. 2016;353:i2893.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Jordan A, Anning C, Ball C, et al. Rapid treatment of newly-diagnosed moderate-severe hypertension is safe and effective. Paper presented at: 27th European Meeting on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection2017; Milan.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Xu W, Goldberg SI, Shubina M, Turchin A. Optimal systolic blood pressure target, time to intensification, and time to follow-up in treatment of hypertension: population based retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2015;350:h158.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Soghikian K. The role of nurse practitioners in hypertension care. Clin Sci Mol Med Suppl. 1978;4:345s–58s.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Claxton K, Martin S, Soares M, et al. Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England). 2015;19(14):1–503, v-vi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Havas S, Roccella EJ, Lenfant C. Reducing the public health burden from elevated blood pressure levels in the United States by lowering intake of dietary sodium. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(1):19–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Rodilla E, Millasseau S, Costa JA, Pascual JM. Arterial destiffening in previously untreated mild hypertensives after 1 year of routine clinical management. Am J Hypertens. 2017;30(5):510–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Gradman AH, Parise H, Lefebvre P, Falvey H, Lafeuille MH, Duh MS. Initial combination therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients: a matched cohort study. Hypertension. 2013;61(2):309–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Weber MA, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Blood pressure dependent and independent effects of antihypertensive treatment on clinical events in the VALUE Trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9426):2049–51.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Thijs L, Richart T, de Leeuw PW, et al. Morbidity and mortality on combination versus monotherapy: a posthoc analysis of the Systolic Hypertension in Europe trial. J Hypertens. 2010;28(4):865–74.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Liu L, Zhang Y, Liu G, Li W, Zhang X, Zanchetti A. The Felodipine Event Reduction (FEVER) Study: a randomized long-term placebo-controlled trial in Chinese hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2005;23(12):2157–72.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Clark CE, Smith LFP, Harding G, Taylor RS, Campbell JL. Nurse led hypertension clinics: evolving ahead of the evidence? J Hum Hypertens. 2011;25(S1)(10):S6.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Courtenay M, Stenner K, Carey N. The views of patients with diabetes about nurse prescribing. Diabet Med. 2010;27(9):1049–54.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Canzanello VJ, Jensen PL, Schwartz LL, Worra JB, Klein LK. Improved blood pressure control with a physician-nurse team and home blood pressure measurement. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(1):31–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Santschi V, Chiolero A, Burnand B, Colosimo AL, Paradis G. Impact of pharmacist care in the management of cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(16):1441–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Leiva A, Aguilo A, Fajo-Pascual M, et al. Efficacy of a brief multifactorial adherence-based intervention in reducing blood pressure: a randomized clinical trial. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:1683–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    McLean DL, McAlister FA, Johnson JA, et al. A randomized trial of the effect of community pharmacist and nurse care on improving blood pressure management in patients with diabetes mellitus: study of cardiovascular risk intervention by pharmacists-hypertension (SCRIP-HTN). Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(1538-3679 (Electronic), 21):2355–61.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Brownstein JN, Chowdhury FM, Norris SL, et al. Effectiveness of community health workers in the care of people with hypertension. [Review] [57 refs]. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(5):435–47.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    British Medical Association, NHS Employers, NHS England. 2016/17 General Medical Services (GMS) contract Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF): guidance for GMS contract 2016/17. NHS Employers; 2016.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Santschi V, Wuerzner G, Chiolero A, et al. Team-based care for improving hypertension management among outpatients (TBC-HTA): study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Maungboon P, Hutayanon P, Silaruks S. A randomized controlled trial of a trained pharmacist-nurse model care on uncomplicated hypertension in primary care setting in rural area of Thailand. J Hypertens. 2011;29:e16-Yes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Qamar N, Bray EP, Glynn LG, et al. Self-monitoring for improving control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(1).Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Salisbury C, O’Cathain A, Thomas C, et al. Telehealth for patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2016;353:i2647.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Tucker KL, Sheppard JP, Stevens R, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP-SMART): a protocol. BMJ Open. 2015;5(9):e008532.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    The SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103–16.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A. Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 7. Effects of more vs. less intensive blood pressure lowering and different achieved blood pressure levels—updated overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials. J Hypertens. 2016;34(4):613–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Gabb GM, Mangoni AA, Anderson CS, et al. Guideline for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in adults—2016. Med J Aust. 2016;205(2):85–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Leung AA, Nerenberg K, Daskalopoulou SS, et al. Hypertension Canada’s 2016 Canadian hypertension education program guidelines for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(5):569–88.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    The ACCORD Study Group. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1575–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Primary Care Research GroupUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Smeall Building, St Luke’s CampusExeterUK
  2. 2.Institute of Health Services ResearchExeterUK

Personalised recommendations