Skip to main content

Using Dynamic CAS and Geometry to Enhance Digital Assessments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uses of Technology in Primary and Secondary Mathematics Education

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

Abstract

Summative assessments, and in particular, online digital summative assessments are dominated by items that present a limited number of possible responses for selection (with multiple choice being the most prevalent example). Less constrained constructed responses to a task might be submitted via digital technology , but in many cases require human evaluation. To avoid this, we present a prototype for enhancing digital assessment by using dynamic computer algebra systems linked with dynamic geometry environments. The technology enhanced items created by this system allow students to create mathematical objects required to have stated properties, and the satisfaction of those properties can be evaluated for mathematical correctness automatically by the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead, U.K.: Open University Press and McGraw-Hill Education Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Hollebrands, K. (2011). Technology tools to support mathematics teaching. In T. P. Dick & K. F. Hollebrands (Eds.), Focus in high school mathematics: Technology to support reasoning and sense making (pp. 105–120). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drijvers, P., Ball, L., Barzel, B., Heid, M. K., Cao, Y., & Maschietto, M. (2016). Uses of technology in lower secondary mathematics education; A concise topical survey. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delozanne, É., Prévit, D., Grugeon, B., & Chenevotot, F. (2008). Automatic multi-criteria assessment of open-ended questions: A case study in school algebra. In B. P. Woolf, E. Aïmeur, R. Nkambou, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), ITS 2008. LNCS (Vol. 5091, pp. 101–110). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, T., & Burrill, G. (2016). Design and implementation principles for dynamic interactive mathematics technologies. In M. Niess, S. Driskell, & K. Hollebrands (Eds.), Handbook of research on transforming mathematics teacher education in the digital age (pp. 23–52). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, T. P., & Hollebrands, K. F. (Eds.). (2011). Focus in high school mathematics: Technology to support reasoning and sense making. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, T. D., & Parker, R. (1990). Expert systems in education and training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Testing Service Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math.

  • Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbiek, R., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: A perspective of constructs. In F. Lester (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 1169–1207). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas P. Dick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dick, T.P. (2018). Using Dynamic CAS and Geometry to Enhance Digital Assessments. In: Ball, L., Drijvers, P., Ladel, S., Siller, HS., Tabach, M., Vale, C. (eds) Uses of Technology in Primary and Secondary Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76575-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76575-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76574-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76575-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics