Advertisement

Plan and Constitution: Aristotle’s Hippodamus: Towards an “Ostensive” Definition of Spatial Planning

  • Luigi MazzaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines the relationship between planning and citizenship by focusing on two passages from Aristotle’s Politics. The first indicates that Hippodamus was a political philosopher and a planner and suggests that he cannot be considered the “inventor” of the orthogonal grid, but rather may be regarded as the first to theorize about the division of population and land within the city and to establish the connection between plan and constitution—that is, between the grid plan and various forms of citizenship. In the second passage, two models of spatial plan are set against each other as expressions of innovation and tradition, and Aristotle discusses the difference between functional and aesthetic aims and prudence, i.e., technical rationality and political reason. On this basis the chapter introduces the spatial inclusion/exclusion pairing as “a concept of planning” and discusses some notes on rules, customs, and tastes which may be helpful in designing a theory of a spatial plan.

Keywords

Aristotle Hippodamus of Miletus Grid plan Politics Constitution Citizenship Spatial planning 

References

  1. Aubonnet, J. (1989). [Aristotle’s] Politique, Livres I et II. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, C., & Bell, R. (1969). City fathers: The early history of town planning in Britain. London: The Cresset Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benevolo, L. (1975). Storia della città. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  4. Benvenuti Falcial, P. (1982). Ippodamo di Mileto, architetto e filosofo. Una ricostruzione filologica della personalità. Florence: Università degli studi di Firenze.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, T. (1981). Halieis: A fourth planned city in classical Greece. Town Planning Review, 52(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns, A. (1976). Hippodamus and the planned city. Historia, 25(4), 414–428.Google Scholar
  7. Castagnoli, F. (1956). Ippodamo di Mileto e l’urbanistica a pianta ortogonale. Rome: De Luca.Google Scholar
  8. Castagnoli, F. (1971). Orthogonal town planning in antiquity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cerdà, I. (1968). Teoria general de la urbanizacion y applicacion de sus principios y doctrinas a la reforma y ensanche de Barcelona. Barcelona: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.Google Scholar
  10. Choay, F. (1986). La regola e il modello. Sulla teoria dell’architettura e dell’urbanistica. Rome: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar
  11. Gaeta, L. (2004). Athenian democracy and the political foundation of space. Planning Theory & Practice, 5, 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerkan, A. (1924). Griechische stadteanlagen: Untersuchungen zur entwicklung des Stadtebaues im Altertum. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giuliano, A. (1966). Urbanistica delle città greche. Milan: il Saggiatore.Google Scholar
  14. Gorman, V. (1995). Aristotle’s Hippodamos (Politics 2.1267b 22–30). Historia, XLIV, 385–395.Google Scholar
  15. Gorman, V. (2001). Miletos, the ornament of Ionia: A history of the city to 400 B.C.E. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greaves, A. (2003). Miletos: A history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Greco, E. (Ed.). (1999). La città greca. Istituzioni, società e forme urbane. Rome: Donzelli.Google Scholar
  18. Jowett, B. (1885). The politics of Aristotle, with an introduction and notes (Vol. II). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lana, I. (1949). L’utopia di Ippodamo di Mileto. Rivista di Filosofia, XL, 125–151.Google Scholar
  20. Laurenti, R. (1993). [Aristotle’s] Politica. Laterza: Rome and Bari.Google Scholar
  21. Lavedan, P., & Hugueney, J. (1966). Histoire de l’urbanisme. Antiquité. Paris: Henry Laurens.Google Scholar
  22. Leveque, P., & Vidal-Naquet, P. (1973). Clisthene l’Athenien. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  23. Liverani, M. (1986). L’origine delle città. Rome: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar
  24. Liverani, M. (1988). Uruk la prima città. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  25. Longo, F. (1999). Mileto. In E. Greco (Ed.), La città greca (pp. 183–204). Rome: Donzelli.Google Scholar
  26. Martin, R. (1956). L’urbanisme dans la Grèce Antique. Paris: Picard & Cie.Google Scholar
  27. Morris, A. (1994). History of urban form: Before the industrial revolutions. Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
  28. Newman, W. (1950). The politics of Aristotle. With an introduction, two prefatory essays and notes critical and explanatory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Owens, E. (1991). The city in the Greek and Roman world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Poete, M. (1958). Introduzione all’urbanistica: la città antica. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  31. Rackham, H. (1950 [1932]). [Aristotle’s] Politics. Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
  32. Schmitt, C. (2006). The nomos of the earth, in the international law of the jus Publicum Europaeum. New York: Tele Press Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Stewart, C. (1968). A prospect of cities: Being studies towards a history of town planning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  34. Strauss, L. (1964). The city and man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Traina, G. (1994). La tecnica in Grecia e a Roma. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  36. Vernant, J. (2001). Mito e pensiero presso i Greci. Studi di psicologia storica. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  37. Viano, C. (2006). [Aristotle’s] Politica. Turin: Utet.Google Scholar
  38. Ward-Perkins, J. (1974). Cities of ancient Greece and Italy: Planning in classical antiquity. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
  39. Zanker, P. (1993). Pompei. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations