Abstract
For the first time since the establishment of TCP and UDP, the Internet transport layer is subject to a major change by the introduction of QUIC. Initiated by Google in 2012, QUIC provides a reliable, connection-oriented low-latency and fully encrypted transport. In this paper, we provide the first broad assessment of QUIC usage in the wild. We monitor the entire IPv4 address space since August 2016 and about 46% of the DNS namespace to detected QUIC-capable infrastructures. Our scans show that the number of QUIC-capable IPs has more than tripled since then to over 617.59 K. We find around 161 K domains hosted on QUIC-enabled infrastructure, but only 15 K of them present valid certificates over QUIC. Second, we analyze one year of traffic traces provided by MAWI, one day of a major European tier-1 ISP and from a large IXP to understand the dominance of QUIC in the Internet traffic mix. We find QUIC to account for 2.6% to 9.1% of the current Internet traffic, depending on the vantage point. This share is dominated by Google pushing up to 42.1% of its traffic via QUIC.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Active measurements and tools. https://quic.comsys.rwth-aachen.de
IETF QUIC working group. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/quic/about/
Carlucci, G., et al.: HTTP over UDP: an experimental investigation of QUIC. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (2015)
Clemente, L.: quic-go. https://github.com/lucas-clemente/quic-go
Cook, S., et al.: QUIC: better for what and for whom? In: IEEE ICC (2017)
Durumeric, Z., et al.: Zmap: Fast internet-wide scanning and its security applications. In: USENIX Security (2013)
Fischlin, M., Günther, F.: Multi-stage key exchange and the case of Google’s QUIC protocol. In: ACM CCS (2014)
Jager, T., et al.: On the security of TLS 1.3 and QUIC against weaknesses in PKCS#1 V1.5 encryption. In: ACM CCS (2015)
Kakhki, A.M., et al.: Taking a long look at QUIC: an approach for rigorous evaluation of rapidly evolving transport protocols. In: ACM IMC (2017)
Langley, A., et al.: The QUIC transport protocol: design and internet-scale deployment. In: ACM SIGCOMM (2017)
LiteSpeed Technologies Inc., LiteSpeed – Release Log. https://www.litespeedtech.com/products/litespeed-web-server/release-log
Lychev, R., et al.: How secure and quick is QUIC? Provable security and performance analyses. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2015)
MAWI Working Group Traffic Archive. http://mawi.nezu.wide.ad.jp/mawi/
Public Interest Registry. Zone File Access. http://pir.org/
Radhakrishnan, S., et al.: TCP fast open. In: ACM CoNEXT (2011)
Raiciu, C., et al.: How hard can it be? designing and implementing a deployable multipath TCP. In: NSDI (2012)
Rescorla, E.: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3. Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tls-tls13-21, Internet Engineering Task Force (2017). WiP
Swett, I.: QUIC - Deployment Experience @Google. https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/slides/slides-96-quic-3.pdf
Verisign. Zone Files For Top-Level Domains (TLDs). verisign.com
Verisign. The verisign domain name industry brief, September 2017. https://www.verisign.com/assets/domain-name-report-Q22017.pdf
Acknowledgments
This work has been funded by the DFG as part of the CRC 1053 MAKI and SPP 1914 REFLEXES, and by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the ENDEAVOUR project (grant agreement 644960). We would like to thank the network operators at RWTH Aachen University, especially Jens Hektor and Bernd Kohler. We further thank our shepherd Tobias Flach and the anonymous reviewers. Furthermore, we would like to thank Konrad Wolsing for maintaining our changes to the quic-go implementation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rüth, J., Poese, I., Dietzel, C., Hohlfeld, O. (2018). A First Look at QUIC in the Wild. In: Beverly, R., Smaragdakis, G., Feldmann, A. (eds) Passive and Active Measurement. PAM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10771. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76481-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76481-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76480-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76481-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)