Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Division of Labour Within Households: Men’s Increased Participation?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Family, Work and Well-Being

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research ((BRIEFSWELLBEING))

Abstract

Unequal division of domestic labor has been seen as a one of the most commonly documented feature on gender inequality in the western countries. The relevance of studying the division of labour in the household has actualized as female participation rates in paid labour have increased and changes in employment systems have taken place. Division of labor refers to the amount and share of time men and women spend in paid and unpaid work. Unpaid work includes domestic chores such as cleaning, repairs, preparing meals, but also caring for children. Unpaid work is usually divided in three subgroups: core household tasks i.e. housework, repairs and household upkeep and child care. Paid and unpaid work together comprises so-called total work time. The main international trend from 1960s onward has been that men have increased and women decreased their time spend in unpaid work. This convergence has been as result of decrease in women’s, but also increases in men’s time spend in unpaid work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlberg, J., Roman, C., & Duncan, S. (2008). Actualizing ‘democratic family?’ Swedish policy rhetoric versus family practices. Social Politics, 15, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altintas, E., & Sullivan, O. (2016). Fifty years of change updated: Cross-national gender convergence in housework. Demographic Research, 35(16), 455–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auspurg, K., Iacovou, M., & Nicoletti, C. (2017). Housework share between partners: Experimental evidence on gender-specific preferences. Social Science Research, 66, 118–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (1997). Gender equality and participation in housework: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 28, 220–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1993). A treatise on the family (Enlarged ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of labor. Social Forces, 79(1), 191–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, S., & Sales, J. (2001). Household Work in the UK: An Analysis of the British Household Panel Survey 1994. Work, Employment and Society, 15(2), 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, M., Lewin-Epstein, N., Stier, H., & Baumgärtner, M. K. (2008). Perceived equity in the gendered division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1145–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 652–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budig, M., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty of motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66(2), 204–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bø, I. (2008). Equal gender opportunity: Couples in the gap between principles and practice. Community, Work & Family, 11, 439–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modelling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 1208–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigall, E. A., & Konrad, A. M. (2007). Gender role attitudes and careers: A longitudinal study. Sex Roles, 56(11), 847–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R. (2006). Employment and the family. The reconfiguration of work and family life in contemporary societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2005). The new gender essentialism–domestic and family ‘choices’ and their relation to attitudes. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 601–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. (2005). Gender in cohabitation and marriage: The influence of gender ideology on housework allocation over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 26(8), 1037–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21, 106–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). The incomplete revolution. Adapting to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. (2004). Dependence within families and the household division of labor: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1272–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. (2007). Changing resources and the division of housework: A longitudinal study of Swedish couples. European Sociological Review, 23, 455–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, C. (2001). The temporal reorganization of employment and the household rhythm of work schedules. the implications for gender and class relations. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(7), 119–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuwa, M., & Cohen, P. H. (2007). Housework and social policy. Social Science Research, 36, 512–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt, R., & Bouknik, S. (2011). Exploring the division of household labor outside the family context: Utilizing resources for doing gender. Community, Work & Family, 15, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing times. Work and leisure in postindustrial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (2004). Time through the life course, in the family. In J. Scott, J. Treas, & M. Richards (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to the sociology of families (pp. 158–178). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (2017). Informal, but not ‘an economy’. In G. Crow & J. Ellis (Eds.), Revisiting divisions of labour: The impacts and legacies of a modern sociological classic (pp. 111–125). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J., Godwin, M., & Jones, S. (1994). The domestic labour revolution: A process of lagged adaptation? In M. Anderson, F. Bechhofer, & J. Gershuny (Eds.), The social and political economy of the household (pp. 151–197). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregson, N., & Lowe, M. (1993). Renegotiating the domestic division of labour? A study of dual career households in North East and South East England. The Sociological Review, 41, 475–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halleröd, B. (2005). Sharing of housework and money among Swedish couples: Do they behave rationally? European Sociological Review, 21(3), 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardesty, C., & Bokemeier, J. (1989). Finding time and making do: Distribution of household labor in nonmetropolitan marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51(1), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisig, J. P. (2011). Who does more housework—rich or poor—a comparison of 33 countries. American Sociological Review, 76, 74–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersch, J., & Stratton, L. (2002). Housework and wages. Journal of Human Resources, 37(1), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, B. (1990). No exit, no voice: Women’s economic dependency and the welfare state. Acta Sociologica, 33, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J. (2006). Care in context: Men´s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 639–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J. (2010). Gender inequality in the welfare state: Sex segregation in housework, 1965–2003. American Journal of Sociology, 115(5), 1480–1523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J. (2017). Women’s housework: New tests of time and money. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., & Gerson, K. (2001). Overworked individuals or overworked families? Explaining trends in work, leisure, and family time. Work and Occupations, 29(1), 40–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., & Gerson, K. (2004). The time divide: Work. Family and Gender Inequality: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. Y., & Gershuny, J. (2009). Gender and time use over the life-course. In M. Brynin & J. Ermisch (Eds.), Changing relationships. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. Y., & Gershuny, J. (2010). Gender segregation and bargaining in domestic labour: Evidence from longitudinal time use data. In R. Crompton, J. Scott & C. Lyonnette (Eds.), Gender Inequalities in the 21st Century. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. Y., Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2011). Gender convergence in domestic work: Discerning the effects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology, 45, 234–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, K., & Waerness, K. (2008). National context and spouse’s housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review, 24, 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesnard, L. (2005). The effects of the family work day on family time. CREST-INSEE working papers 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher, K., & Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent–child relationships in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26, 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P. (2003). It’s about time. Couples and Careers: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsche, N., & Grunow, D. (2016). Housework over the course of relationships: Gender ideology, resources, and the division of housework from a growth curve perspective. Advances in Life Course Research, 29, 80–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, M. (2001). The impact of domestic work on men’s and women’s wages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4), 1134–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyman, C. (1999). Gender equality in ‘the most equal country in the world’? Money and marriage in Sweden. The Sociological Review, 47, 766–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2005). Babies and bosses—Reconciling work and family life (Vol. 4): Canada, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. OECD: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oinas, T. (2010). Domestic division of labour in dual-earner households. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. (Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 402).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppanner, L., Branden, M., & Turunen, J. (2017). Does unequal housework lead to divorce? Evidence from Sweden. Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516674664.

  • Sayer, L. C. (2010). Trends in housework. In J. Treas & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: Men, women, & household work in cross-national perspective (pp. 19–38). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, O. (2004). Changing gender practices within the household: A theoretical perspective. Gender & Society, 18(2), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, O. (2011). An end to gender display through the performance of housework? A review and reassessment of the quantitative literature using insights from the qualitative literature. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2016). Change in spousal human capital and housework: A longitudinal analysis. European Sociological Review, 32(6), 864–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treas, J. (2010). Why study housework? In J. Treas & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: Men, Women, & household work in cross-national perspective (pp. 3–18). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van der Lippe, T., Voorpostel, M., & Hewitt, B. (2014). Disagreements among cohabiting and married couples in 22 European countries. Demographic Research, 31(10), 247–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C. (2002). Household strategies: Their conceptual relevance and analytical scope in social research. Sociology, 36(2), 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, T. (2003). Class- and gender-based working time? Time poverty and the division of domestic labour. Sociology, 37(4), 733–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O. (1997). Class counts. Comparative studies in class analysis. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Tomi Oinas

Authors
  1. Tomi Oinas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomi Oinas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Mia Tammelin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oinas, T. (2018). The Division of Labour Within Households: Men’s Increased Participation?. In: Tammelin, M. (eds) Family, Work and Well-Being. SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76463-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76463-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76462-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76463-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation