Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nursing Diagnosis Specific to Oncology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principle of Nursing in Oncology

Part of the book series: Principles of Specialty Nursing ((PSN))

  • 1495 Accesses

Abstract

Nurses, regardless of the areas they work and specialized, are coming under increasing pressure to highlight their contribution into healthcare and patient outcomes. In order to demonstrate nursing contribution to cancer care, visible and quantifiable use of standardized diagnosis, intervention, and outcome terminologies is necessary. Identifying the pattern of core diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes for oncology nurses can direct nursing care in clinical practice and establish future research to target areas of high impact and guide education and evaluation of nurse competencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ackley BJ, Ladwig GB, MBF M, editors. Nursing diagnosis handbook: an evidence-based guide to planning care. 11th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bilgin S, Gozum S. Effect of nursing care given at home on the quality of life of patients with stomach cancer and their family caregivers’ nursing care. Eur J Cancer Care. 2018;27(2):e12567.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Butler M, Treacy M, Scott A, Hyde A, Mac Neela P, Irving K, Byrne A, Drennan J. Towards a nursing minimum data set for Ireland: making Irish nursing visible. J Adv Nurs. 2006;55(3):364–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caldeira S, Timmins F, de Carvalho EC, Vieira M. Nursing diagnosis of “spiritual distress” in women with breast cancer prevalence and major defining characteristics. Cancer Nurs. 2016;39(4):321–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caldeira S, Timmins F, de Carvalho EC, Vieira M. Spiritual well-being and spiritual distress in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: utilizing the SWBQ as component of holistic nursing diagnosis. J Relig Health. 2017;56(4):1489–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0390-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Charalambous A, Radwin L, Berg A, Sjovall K, Patiraki E, Lemonidou C, Katajisto J, Suhonen R. An international study of hospitalized cancer patients’ health status, nursing care quality, perceived individuality in care and trust in nurses: a path analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;61:176–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.06.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Charalambous A, Adamakidou T, Cloconi C, Charalambous M, Tsitsi T, Vondráčková L, Bužgová R. The quality of oncology nursing care: a cross sectional survey in three countries in Europe. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017;27:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2016.12.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Carvalho EC, Eduardo AHA, Romanzini A, Simão TP, Zamarioli CM, Garbuio DC, Herdman TH. Correspondence between NANDA international nursing diagnoses and outcomes as proposed by the nursing outcomes classification. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2018;29(1):66–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrell B, McCabe MS, Levit L. The institute of medicine report on high quality cancer care: implications for oncology nursing. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013;40(6):603–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S. NANDA international nursing diagnoses: definitions and classification 2015–2017. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2014. p. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ilce A, Totur B, Ozbayir T. Evaluation of patients with brain tumors according to ınternational NANDA nursing diagnoses: care suggestions/Beyin tümörlü hastaların uluslararası NANDA hemşirelik tanılarına göre değerlendirilmesi: Bakım önerileri. J Neurol Sci. 2010;27(2):178–84.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jomar RT, de Souza Bispo VR. The most common nursing diagnosis among adults/seniors hospitalised with cancer: integrative review. Ecancermedicalscience. 2014;8:462. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2014.462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jomar RT, de Souza Bispo VR. The most common nursing diagnosis among adults/seniors hospitalised with cancer: integrative review. Ecancermedicalscience. 2014;8:462. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2014.462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jomar RT, Gomes RAF, Leite DC, Gomes HF, Peres EM, Junior EFP. Nursing diagnoses in adult/elderly patients undergoing outpatient antineoplastic chemotherapy: a review. Ecancermedicalscience. 2017;11:736. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.736.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones T. Outcome measurement in nursing: imperatives, ideals, history, and challenges. Online J Issues Nur. 2016;21(2). Manuscript 1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jones D, Lunney M, Keenan G, Moorhead S. Standardized nursing languages: essential for the nursing workforce. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2010;28:253–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Juvé-Udina ME. What patients’ problems do nurses e-chart? Longitudinal study to evaluate the usability of an interface terminology. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(12):1698–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.04.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Milani A, Mauri S, Gandini S, Magon G. Oncology nursing minimum data set (ONMDS): can we hypothesize a set of prevalent nursing sensitive outcomes (NSO) in cancer patients? Ecancermedicalscience. 2013;7:345. Published 2013 Sep 2. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2013.345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Morris R, Matthews A, Scott AP. Validity, reliability and utility of the Irish nursing minimum data set for general nursing in investigating the effectiveness of nursing interventions in a general nursing setting: a repeated measures design. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(4):562–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.07.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moysés AMB, Durant LC, de Almeida AM, Gozzo T de O. Integrative review of factors related to the nursing diagnosis nausea during antineoplastic chemotherapy. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016;24:e2812. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1176.2812.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Muller-Staub M, Lavin MA, Needham I, van Achterberg T. Nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes – application and impact on nursing practice: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(5):514–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04012.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. NANDA International. http://kb.nanda.org/article/AA-00226/30/English-/Resources/Glossary-of-Terms.html. Accessed 10 June 2018.

  23. Ogasawara C, Hasegawa T, Kume Y, Takahashi I, Katayama Y, Furuhashi Y, Andoh M, Yamamoto Y, Okazaki S, Tanabe M. Nursing diagnoses and interventions of Japanese patients with end-stage breast cancer admitted for different care purposes. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2005;16(3–4):54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Palese A, Zanini A, Carlevaris E, Morandin A, Carpanelli I, Dante A. Hidden outpatient oncology clinical nursing minimum data set: findings from an Italian multi-method study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(4):423–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2012.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Phelps L, Ralph SS, Taylor CM. Sparks and Taylor’s nursing diagnosis reference manual. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rutherford M. Standardized nursing language: what does it mean for nursing practice? Online J Issues Nurs. 2008;13(1) https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol13No01PPT05.

  27. Speksnijder HT, Mank AP, van Achterberg T. Nursing diagnoses (NANDA-I) in hematology-oncology: a Delphi-study. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2011;22(2):77–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-618X.2011.01183.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Standard nursing terminologies: a landscape analysis. 2017. https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/snt_final_05302017.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2018.

  29. Tastan S, Linch GC, Keenan GM, Stifter J, McKinney D, Fahey L, Lopez KD, Yao Y, Wilkie DJ. Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(8):1160–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tseng H. Use of standardized nursing terminologies in electronic health records for oncology care: the impact of NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC. PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, University of Iowa; 2012. http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1409

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey

    Sultan Kav

Authors
  1. Sultan Kav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sultan Kav .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Unicancer, Paris, France

    Françoise Charnay-Sonnek

  2. University Hospital of Geneva, Geneve, Switzerland

    Anne E. Murphy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kav, S. (2019). Nursing Diagnosis Specific to Oncology. In: Charnay-Sonnek, F., Murphy, A. (eds) Principle of Nursing in Oncology . Principles of Specialty Nursing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76457-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76457-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76456-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76457-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation