Skip to main content

Abstract

Species distribution models (SDM) are widely used for ecological research and conservation purposes. Given a set of species occurrence, the aim is to infer its spatial distribution over a given territory. Because of the limited number of occurrences of specimens, this is usually achieved through environmental niche modeling approaches, i.e. by predicting the distribution in the geographic space on the basis of a mathematical representation of their known distribution in environmental space (= realized ecological niche). The environment is in most cases represented by climate data (such as temperature, and precipitation), but other variables such as soil type or land cover can also be used. In this paper, we propose a deep learning approach to the problem in order to improve the predictive effectiveness. Non-linear prediction models have been of interest for SDM for more than a decade but our study is the first one bringing empirical evidence that deep, convolutional and multilabel models might participate to resolve the limitations of SDM. Indeed, the main challenge is that the realized ecological niche is often very different from the theoretical fundamental niche, due to environment perturbation history, species propagation constraints and biotic interactions. Thus, the realized abundance in the environmental feature space can have a very irregular shape that can be difficult to capture with classical models. Deep neural networks on the other side, have been shown to be able to learn complex non-linear transformations in a wide variety of domains. Moreover, spatial patterns in environmental variables often contains useful information for species distribution but are usually not considered in classical models. Our study shows empirically how convolutional neural networks efficiently use this information and improve prediction performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover + eBook
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://inpn.mnhn.fr/.

  2. 2.

    http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/chap6.html

  3. 3.

    https://inpn.mnhn.fr.

  4. 4.

    https://www.gbif.org/.

  5. 5.

    http://www.tela-botanica.org/site:accueil.

  6. 6.

    https://www.inaturalist.org/.

  7. 7.

    http://naturgucker.de/enjoynature.net.

  8. 8.

    https://plantnet.org/en/.

  9. 9.

    https://www.gbif.org/.

References

  1. Hutchinson, G. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold spring harbor symposium on quantitative biology. 22, 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. (1986). Generalized Additive Models. Statistical Science, 1(3), 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman, J. (1991). Multivariate adaptive regression splines. The annals of statistics, 1–67.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Phillips, S., Dudik, M., Schapire, R. (2004). A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning, 83.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips, S., Anderson, R. & Schapire, R. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological modelling, 190(3), 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 1097–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lek, S., Delacoste, M., Baran, P., Dimopoulos, I., Lauga, J. & Aulagnier, S. (1996). Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology. Ecological modelling, 90(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thuiller, W. (2003). BIOMOD–optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global change biology, 9(10), 1353–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leathwick, J.R. Elith, J. & Hastie, T. (2006). Comparative performance of generalized additive models and multivariate adaptive regression splines for statistical modelling of species distributions. Ecological modelling, 199(2), 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. LeCun, Y. & others. (1989). Generalization and network design strategies. Connectionism in perspective, 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ward, G., Hastie, T., Barry, S., Elith, J. & Leathwick, J. (2009). Presence-only data and the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 65(2), 554–563.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Berman, M., & Turner, T. R. (1992). Approximating point process likelihoods with GLIM. Applied Statistics, 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P Anderson, R., Dudk, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., J Hijmans, R., Huettmann, F., …& A Loiselle, B. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29(2), 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Phillips, S. & Dudik, M. (2008). Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31(2), 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fithian, W., & Hastie, T. (2013). Finite-sample equivalence in statistical models for presence-only data. The annals of applied statistics.7,4,1917.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips, S. Anderson, R., Dudik, M. Schapire, R. & Blair, M. (2017). Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent. Ecography.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G. & Williams, R. and others (1988). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Cognitive modeling, 5(3).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nair, V. & Hinton, G. (2010). Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10), 807–814.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ioffe, S. & Szegedy, C. (2015). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. International Conference on Machine Learning. 448–456.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dutrève, B. & Robert, S. (2016). INPN - Données flore des CBN agrégées par la FCBN. Version 1.1. SPN - Service du Patrimoine naturel, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. Occurrence Dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/omae84 accessed via GBIF.org on 2017-08-30.

  22. Karger, D. N., Conrad, O., Bohner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W. & Kessler, M. (2016). Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.00217.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Karger, D. N., Conrad, O., Bohner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W. & Kessler, M. (2016). CHELSEA climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas (Version 1.1).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zomer, R., Bossio, D., Trabucco, A., Yuanjie, L., Gupta, D. & Singh, V. (2007). Trees and water: smallholder agroforestry on irrigated lands in Northern India.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zomer, R., Trabucco, A., Bossio, D. & Verchot, L. (2008). Climate change mitigation: A spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 126(1), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Panagos, P. (2006). The European soil database. GEO: connexion, 5(7), 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Panagos, P., Van Liedekerke, M., Jones, A., Montanarella, L. (2012). European Soil Data Centre: Response to European policy support and public data requirements. Land Use Policy, 29(2),329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Liedekerke, M. Jones, A. & Panagos, P. (2006). ESDBv2 Raster Library-a set of rasters derived from the European Soil Database distribution v2. 0. European Commission and the European Soil Bureau Network, CDROM, EUR, 19945.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, T., Li, M., Li, Y., Lin, M., Wang, N., Wang, M., …& Zhang, Z. (2015). Mxnet: A flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.01274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Botella, C., Joly, A., Bonnet, P., Monestiez, P., Munoz, F. (2018). A Deep Learning Approach to Species Distribution Modelling. In: Joly, A., Vrochidis, S., Karatzas, K., Karppinen, A., Bonnet, P. (eds) Multimedia Tools and Applications for Environmental & Biodiversity Informatics. Multimedia Systems and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76445-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76445-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76444-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76445-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics