Skip to main content

A Psychologically-Realistic Personality Model for Virtual Agents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Behavior Engineering and Applications

Abstract

The design of psychologically-realistic behavior in virtual agents should be based on the psychometrics that identify and quantify human psychological traits. Many personality models used in agent architectures simply treat the traits identified from personality theory as numeric inputs to control agent behavior. This results in agents with personalities that cannot be evaluated with psychometric instruments like personality inventories. This is because these models primarily consist of configuration variables. In this chapter, we use psychometrics to design a personality model for a virtual agent that can be evaluated using validated personality questionnaires. The personality model also generates sentiment, which the agent uses to decide how to respond to the questionnaire. The results indicate that by using International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) items to seed an agent’s memory, it is possible to create an agent with a personality that tests consistently across multiple personality inventories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These items are the statements that are used in personality inventories.

References

  1. R. Sun and S. Hélie, “Psychologically realistic cognitive agents: taking human cognition seriously,” Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 65–92, Mar. 2013. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2012.661236

  2. C. M. Macal, “Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation,” Journal of Simulation, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 144–156, May 2016. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/jos.2016.7

  3. A. O. Iuga and M. J. McGuire, “Adherence and health care costs,” Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, vol. 7, pp. 35–44, Feb. 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3934668/

  4. K. Glanz and B. K. Rimer, Theory at a glance: A guide for health promotion practice. US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 1997, no. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. L. Stonerock and J. A. Blumenthal, “Role of Counseling to Promote Adherence in Healthy Lifestyle Medicine: Strategies to Improve Exercise Adherence and Enhance Physical Activity,” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 455–462, Mar. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033062016301050

  6. British Broadcasting Corporation, “What Kind of Person Becomes a Violent Jihadi?, The Inquiry - BBC World Service.” [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03qr716

  7. F. Galton, “Psychometric experiments,” Brain, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 149–162, 1879. [Online]. Available: http://galton.renoster.com/essays/1870-1879/galton-1879-brain-psychometric-experiments/galton-1879-brain-psychometric-experiments.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. L. Gardner, “Measuring attitudes to science: Unidimensionality and internal consistency revisited,” Research in science education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 283–289, 1995. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02357402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Mairesse, M. A. Walker, M. R. Mehl, and R. K. Moore, “Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text,” Journal of artificial intelligence research, vol. 30, pp. 457–500, 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.jair.org/papers/paper2349.html

  10. S. E. Hussein and M. H. Granat, “Intention detection using a neuro-fuzzy EMG classifier,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 123–129, Nov. 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Polzehl, S. Moller, and F. Metze, “Automatically assessing personality from speech,” in Semantic Computing (ICSC), 2010 IEEE Fourth International Conference on. IEEE, 2010, pp. 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Hilsenroth, D. Segal, and M. Hersen, Eds., Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment, Personality Assessment. John Wiley & Sons, 2004, vol. 2, google-Books-ID: mwgdJBOgNJAC.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Flügel and E. J. D. Radclyffe, “The Pressey Cross-Out Test Compared with a Questionnaire,” British Journal of Medical Psychology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 112–131, Jun. 1928. [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1928.tb00678.x/abstract

  14. D. E. Super, “The Bernreuter Personality Inventory: a review of research.” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 94–125, 1942. [Online]. Available: http://content.apa.org/journals/bul/39/2/94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. J. Schretlen, “The use of psychological tests to identify malingered symptoms of mental disorder,” Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 451–476, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. R. Derogatis and K. L. Savitz, “The SCL-90-R and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) in Primary Care. Maruish, ME,” in Handbook of Psychological Assessment in Primary Care Settings, M. E. Maruish, Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, pp. 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Hersen and V. B. Van Hasselt, Eds., Advanced abnormal psychology, 2nd ed. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization, “WHO | International Classification of Diseases.” [Online]. Available: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/

  19. A. A. J. Hendriks, “The construction of the five-factor personality inventory (FFPI),” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. R. Goldberg, “Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons,” Review of personality and social psychology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 141–165, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Hendriks and W. Hofstee, “The Five-Factor Personality Inventory: Assessing the Big Five by means of brief and concrete statements,” 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Zhang, J. Zheng, and N. Magnenat-Thalmann, “Modeling Personality, Mood, and Emotions,” in Context Aware Human-Robot and Human-Agent Interaction, N. Magnenat-Thalmann, J. Yuan, D. Thalmann, and B.-J. You, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 211–236, dOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19947-4_10. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-19947-4_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Lin, H. Yu, C. Miao, and L. Qiu, “Towards Emotionally Intelligent Machines: Taking Social Contexts into Account,” in Social Computing and Social Media. Springer, Cham, Jul. 2016, pp. 12–24, dOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39910-2_2. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-39910-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Saberi, “Personality-Based Cognitive Design of Characters in Virtual Environments,” in Integrating Cognitive Architectures into Virtual Character Design. IGI Global, 2016, pp. 124–150. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=b2hPDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA124&ots=x1mc5kuO-j&sig=UHaFPRYoaiwdKebjOctjaUlfxLE

  25. J. You and M. Katchabaw, “A flexible multi-model approach to psychosocial integration in non player characters in modern video games,” in Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology. ACM, 2010, pp. 17–24. [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1920782

  26. V. Zammitto, S. DiPaola, and A. Arya, “A methodology for incorporating personality modeling in believable game characters,” arya, vol. 1, no. 613.520, p. 2600, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.sfu.ca/~vzammitt/papers/zammitto-cybergames-pp.pdf

  27. J. Salvit and E. Sklar, “Modulating agent behavior using human personality type,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Human-Agent Interaction Design and Models (HAIDM) at Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS). Citeseer, 2012, pp. 145–160. [Online]. Available: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.258.5686&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  28. S. Ahrndt, J. Fähndrich, and S. Albayrak, “Modelling of Personality in Agents: From Psychology to Implementation.” [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sebastian_Ahrndt/publication/275945792_Modelling_of_Personality_in_Agents_From_Psychology_to_Implementation/links/5549cf3a0cf205bce7ac4041.pdf

  29. A. Egges, S. Kshirsagar, and N. Magnenat-Thalmann, “A model for personality and emotion simulation,” in International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. Springer, 2003, pp. 453–461. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-45224-9_63

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Saberi, U. Bernardet, and S. DiPaola, “Model of Personality-Based, Nonverbal Behavior in Affective Virtual Humanoid Character,” in Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ACM, 2015, pp. 371–372. [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2823296

  31. P. Rizzo, M. Veloso, M. Miceli, and A. Cesta, “Personality-driven social behaviors in believable agents,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Socially Intelligent Agents, 1997, pp. 109–114. [Online]. Available: http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Fall/1997/FS-97-02/FS97-02-026.pdf

  32. W. K. Hofstee, B. de Raad, and L. R. Goldberg, “Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 146–163, 1992. [Online]. Available: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. L. R. Goldberg, “The structure of phenotypic personality traits,” The American Psychologist, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 26–34, Jan. 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. P. T. Costa and R. R. MacCrae, Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Incorporated, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. R. McCrae and P. T. Costa, “A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 587–596, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. K. Lee and M. C. Ashton, “Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory,” Multivariate behavioral research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 329–358, 2004. [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Mehrabian, “Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in Temperament,” Current Psychology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 261–292, Dec. 1996. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02686918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. P. Gebhard, “ALMA: a layered model of affect,” in Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM, 2005, pp. 29–36. [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1082478

  39. A. Ortony, G. L. Clore, and A. Collins, The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge university press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  40. B. J. Underwood, “Some correlates of item repetition in free-recall learning,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 83–94, Feb. 1969. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022537169800150

  41. C. D. Broad, “Emotion and sentiment,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 203–214, 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. L. Bernard, Instinct: A Study in Social Psychology. Holt, 1924. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?id=0DUEAAAAMAAJ

  43. L. R. Goldberg, “The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.” Psychological assessment, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 26, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. G. Saucier, “Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors.” Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 73, no. 6, p. 1296, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. C. G. DeYoung, L. C. Quilty, and J. B. Peterson, “Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five.” Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 93, no. 5, p. 880, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Curtis L. Gittens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gittens, C.L. (2018). A Psychologically-Realistic Personality Model for Virtual Agents. In: Wong, R., Chi, CH., Hung, P. (eds) Behavior Engineering and Applications. International Series on Computer Entertainment and Media Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76430-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76430-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76429-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76430-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics