Abstract
The thesis of this chapter is that the traditional content of most MBA and other higher education programmes on management should be reconstructed to consider the special problems faced by women in management and employ strategies to teach both men and women how to mitigate them. This chapter begins by discussing gender inequality in management positions and reasons why women are under-represented, despite general acceptance of the importance of gender diversity for organizational success.
It reports examples of informal activities to improve women’s position in the workplace, such as mentoring and efforts to enhance the status of women by ‘spreading the word’ of their professional competence through conferences, workshops, ‘women in business’ groups, and literary publications. Formal management education programmes for women are summarized, including those offered in collaboration between academic institutions and business companies. Arguments are made for the introduction of transformative learning to management programmes, by which participants might move from a paradigm in which women are assumed (by themselves as well as men) to be poor managers in need of masculine support, to another which empowers women to recognize their unique strengths and capitalize on them.
Examples are provided of teaching methods for transformative learning, such as creating classroom environments that convey a sense of trust and security, in which students feel free to experiment with new behaviour in learner-centred approaches that promote student autonomy, participation, and collaboration. An appendix contains the details of an ‘ice-breaker’ game as an example of an exercise for the start of a management education course that includes transformative learning, to encourage new students to relax and get to know each other as a constructive prelude to their studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alba, D. (2015, October 14). Google backs groups that help women network in tech. Wired.
Anita B.org. (2018). Join a local. Retrieved January 14, 2018, from https://community.anitab.org/groups/
Barron, B. (2017, March 9). 9 powerful professional organizations for women in business. GoDaddy.
Bell, E. L. J. E. (2011, November 17). When mean girls go to work. Huffington Post.
Bell, E. L. J. E., & Nkomo, S. M. (2003). Our separate ways: Black and white women and the struggle for professional identity. Harvard Business Review Press.
Bell, E. L. J. E., & Villarosa, L. (2011). Career GPS: Strategies for women navigating the new corporate landscape. HarperCollins.
de Bono, E. (2017). Six thinking hats. Penguin UK
Carleton. (2018). Retrieved January 14, 2018, from https://carleton.ca/creww/registration-awlp/
Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010, March). Women in management: Delusions of progress. Harvard Business Review.
Chadwick-Blossey, S. (Ed.), & Robertson, D. R. (Associate Ed.). (2004). To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (Vol. 23). Wiley.
Daily Mail Reporter. (2009, August 13). Women prefer to work for male bosses… because they’re ‘better managers and less prone to moods’. Daily Mail UK. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk
Debebe, G. (2011). Creating a safe environment for women’s leadership transformation. Journal of Management Education, 35(5). First published April 6, 2011.
Educationcareer. (2018). Retrieved January 14, 2018, from http://www.educationcareer.net.au/events/the-6th-women-in-project-management-leadership-summit-2018
Ferree, M., & Hess, B. (2002). Controversy and coalition: The new feminist movement across four decades of change. Routledge
Fine, C. (2011). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. W. W. Norton.
Fortune editors. (2017, June 7). These are the women CEOs leading Fortune 500 companies. Fortune.
Grabitz, I. (2012, June 12). Managers consider women support sufficient. Die Welt (translated from German).
Grabove, V. (1997). The many facets of transformative learning theory and practice. In P. Cranton (Ed.), New directions for adult and continuing education: No. 74. Transformative learning in action: Insights from practice (pp. 89–95). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Gray, J. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships. HarperCollins.
Hall, A. L. (2011). The IPINIONS journal: Commentaries on the major events of our times (Vol. 6). iUniverse.
Imel, S. (1998). Transformative learning in adulthood. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED42326. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved January 15, 2018, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED423426
Kellogg Northwestern. (2018). The journey to the boardroom. Kellogg Northwestern. Retrieved from http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/executive-education/individual-programs/executive-programs/women.aspx
King, L. (2016, September 29). Anita Borg Institute chief on how tech women will have ‘a place at the table’. Forbes.
Kitchenham, A. (2008, April). The evolution of John Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Journal of Transformative Education, 6(2), 104–123.
Kitroeff, N., & Rodkin, J. (2015, October 21). The real payoff from an MBA is different for men and women. Bloomberg Business Week.
Knapp, J. (2007). For the common good: The ethics of leadership in the 21st century. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Knipfer, K., Shaughnessy, B., Hentschel, T. (2016). A curricular example for developing female leaders in academia. Journal of Management Education, 41(2), 272–302, 2017. First published October 13, 2016.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Landsbaum, C. (2016, December 19). Michelle Obama said she was hurt by the ‘angry black woman’ label. The Cut. Retrieved from www.thecut.com
Mark, L. S., & Todd, J. T. (1983). The perception of growth in three dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 33(2), 193–196.
McKie, R. (2010, August 15). Male and female ability differences down to socialisation, not genetics. Guardian.
MGSM. (2014). MGSM announces major investment into women’s management education. Retrieved November 21, 2014, from https://www.mq.edu.au/newsroom/2014/11/21/mgsm-announces-major-investment-into-womens-management-education/
Ozga, J. (1993). Women in educational management. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. Random House.
Shad, S. (2017, March 15). When female managers are better at kicking you down than helping you up. Telegraph. Retrieved from www.dailytelegraph.com.au
Simpson, R. (1995). Is management education on the right track for women? Women in Management Review, 10(6), 3–8.
Smith, C., & Hutchinson, J. (1994). Addressing gender issues in management education: An Australian initiative. Women in Management Review, 9(7), 29–33.
Taylor, E. W. (2000). Analyzing research on transformative learning theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 29–310). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
The Globalist. (2014, March 8). 10 facts for International Women’s Day. The Globalist.
van der Gaag, N. (2014, September 29). Women are better off today, but still far from being equal with men. Guardian.
Wan, H. (2014, May 20). The surprising racial bias against Asians. CNN.
Wells, R. (2016, March 8). ‘What are you planning to do for a job?’: How pregnancy changes careers. News.com.au .
Wheeling, K. (2015, November 30). The brains of men and women aren’t really that different, study finds. Science. Retrieved from sciencemag.org
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Matrix
An active learning exercise designed by Elizabeth Christopher
Echristopher051@gmail.com
February 2018
Purposes
The purposes of this activity are that it shall be:
-
A ‘warm-up’ at the start of a teaching or training session whose participants are from widely different backgrounds and mostly unknown to each other;
-
An introduction to the subject matter of the session, especially useful for transformative learning, that is, when learners are shown how to use their previous interpretations of given situations, events, people, concepts and so on, to enable new or revised perceptions and possibilities for change in behaviour.
The activity involves students experientially in several ways:
-
They move around the room, meeting many or all their fellow participants for the first time and engaging with them.
-
They learn something about each other.
-
Because the statements can be changed by the session presenters, the activity can be tailor-made to suit specific teaching and learning needs.
-
Because the activity is both entertaining and personal, it creates a comfortable and mutually supportive learning environment for the teaching or training session to follow.
Procedure
-
Size of group: probably around 20 people, but the activity will work well with fewer (though probably no fewer than, say, 8) or as many as the space will permit.
-
Playing time: About half an hour, including discussion, and depending on numbers.
-
Classroom layout: Participants must be free to move around. If a sufficiently clear space is not available in the classroom, presenters might make use of an adjacent room or somewhere outside the building, for example, in a garden, then recall the players for a plenary session in the classroom when the game is over (15–20 minutes).
-
Resources:
-
Each player will need a copy of the set of statements. These will not necessarily be the same statements as illustrated below. Presenters may want to change them, depending on the nature of the programme to follow the warm-up, but the format and number of statements should remain.
-
Each set should be printed on paper as heavy as possible. Alternatively each set might be pasted onto a cardboard backing, cut to fit.
-
Each player will need a pen or pencil.
-
One, two, or three small prizes will be needed for the winner or winners.
-
Briefing and Administering the Game
-
1.
Presenters explain that the object of the game is for players to gain insights to their own and others’ culture-related values (depending on how these are understood in the context of the teaching or training session to follow).
Players will move around to find somebody who can truthfully reply ‘yes’ to ONE of the statements on the sheet they will be given. When they do so, the respondent (including themselves) will sign their name across the relevant box and move on. No player may sign more than one box. The winner(s) will be players whose papers have the most signatures after a playing time of 20 minutes, and each will receive a small prize.
-
2.
All players are then issued with a copy of the statements (as in the example below but the statements can be changed to fit the occasion) and the game begins. Presenters call a halt after 15–20 minutes. If any player submits a winning entry before that time, presenters keep it on hand and allow the game to continue. They do the same for any other winners before time is up.
-
Debriefing: When the game is over, presenters initiate a general discussion and respond to players’ comments on their experience.
Matrix
Instructions
The object of the game is to gain insights to your own and others’ culture-related values. Find somebody (you can include yourself) who can truthfully reply ‘yes’ to ONE of the above statements. Ask them to initial the relevant box and move on. No player may initial more than one box. The winner(s) will be the player(s) whose paper has the most signatures! You have 20 minutes to complete this exercise and the winner(s) will receive a small prize. Good hunting!
I believe that men are from Mars and women are from Venus | Democracy is the best form of government for all nations | I have friends from different backgrounds including race and sexual orientation | My parents are of different nationalities (from each other or from me) |
I have been arrested by the police | I support gay marriages | I have experienced discrimination | I need to spend time on my own each day |
I have taken part in a protest demonstration | I am a member of a social minority | If facts appear to refute a theory, I will question the facts before rejecting the theory | I hold strong views (for or against) Brexit |
I am a people-person | Each country should have its own form of government | I have climbed a mountain and/or been deep sea diving | Same-sex marriages should be banned |
Personal use of recreational drugs should be decriminalized | There is no such thing as ‘society’; only individuals | Society is more important than individuals | Never mind the theory, give me the facts |
I judge by first impressions | I listen first and speak last | My country is part of ASEAN | I speak first and listen afterwards |
I believe my seniors are wiser than I | I live in the present | I look to the future | I believe in myself |
I like to travel | Home is best | I am open to new ideas | I am cautious about change |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Christopher, E. (2018). Management Education for Women—and Men?. In: Christopher, E. (eds) Meeting Expectations in Management Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76412-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76412-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76411-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76412-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)