Abstract
In this chapter, we presents theory and research on mathematical interventions, which are programs used to provide supplementary opportunities to children who are struggling with learning mathematical concepts, facts, and procedures either in small groups or individually (Tiers 2 and 3 of the Response to Intervention framework). Fifteen mathematical interventions and curricula for students in Pre-Kindergarten through Post-Secondary levels are listed that meet the Institute of Education Sciences’ What Works Clearinghouse’s standards, with scientific evidence of potentially positive effects on mathematical outcomes. Three additional programs with digital components are highlighted: The Number Race; Fluency and Automaticity through Systematic Teaching with Technology (FASTT Math); and SRA Number Worlds® with Building Blocks®. For each of these programs, we provide an overview, describe the user’s experience, and summarize theoretical frameworks and efficacy studies. Furthermore, we describe how components of the programs are related to neuroscience theory and research on mathematical cognition and development, particularly Dehaene and colleagues’ triple-code model of numerical processing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory. Cognition, 44, 75–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90051-I
Baroody, A. J., Bajwa, N. P., & Eiland, M. (2009). Why can’t Johnny remember the basic facts? Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.45
Barrows, H. S., & Kelson, A. M. (1993). Problem-based learning: A total approach to education. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Case, R. (1992). Neo-Piagetian theories of child development. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual Development. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Clements, D. H. (2002). Computers in early childhood mathematics. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(2), 160–181.
Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: Toward a framework for “research-based curricula”. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 35–70.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (Eds.). (2004). Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 136–163. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.libraries.uc.edu/stable/30034954
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2008). Experimental evaluation of the effects of a research-based preschool mathematics curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 443–494. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.libraries.uc.edu/stable/30069453
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood mathematics intervention. Science, 333(6045), 968–970. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204537
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Spitler, M. E., Lange, A. A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 127–166.
Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Wolfe, C. B., & Spitler, M. E. (2013). Longitudinal evaluation of a scale-up model for teaching mathematics with trajectories and technologies: Persistence of effects in the third year. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 812–850. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212469270
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1–2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-N
Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83–120.
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex, 33(2), 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70002-9
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000239
FASTT Math Next Generation Research Foundation paper. (2012). New York, NY: Scholastic Inc. Retrieved from http://www.hmhco.com/products/fastt-math/files/FASTTMathNG_FoundationPaper.pdf
Fleischner, J. E., Garnett, K., & Shepard, M. J. (1982). Proficiency in arithmetic basic facts computation of learning disabled children. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 4, 47–56.
Fosnot, C. T., & Dolk, M. (2001). Young mathematicians at work: Constructing number sense. Westport, CT: Heinemann.
Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., & Hollenbeck, K. (2007). Extending responsiveness to intervention to mathematics at first and third grades. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 13–24.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Craddock, C., Hollenbeck, K. N., Hamlett, C. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2008). Effects of small-group tutoring with and without validated classroom instruction on at-risk students’ math problem solving: Are two tiers of prevention better than one? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 491–509.
Fuchs, L. S., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., Fletcher, J. M., Fuchs, D., … Zumeta, R. O. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 561–576.
Fuchs, L. S., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., Fletcher, J. M., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 89–100. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.09.003.
Fuchs, L. S., Seethaler, P. M., Powell, S. R., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155–173.
Fuson, K. C. (1982). An analysis of the counting-on procedure in addition. In T. H. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. H. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 67–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York, NY: Springer.
Fuson, K. C. (1992). Research on whole number addition and subtraction. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 243–275). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Geary, D. C., Bailey, D. H., Littlefield, A., Wood, P., Hoard, M. K., & Nugent, L. (2009). First-grade predictors of mathematical learning disability: A latent class trajectory analysis. Cognitive Development, 24, 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.10.001
Griffin, S. (2004). Building number sense with Number Worlds: A mathematics program for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.012
Griffin, S. (2009). Learning sequences in the acquisition of mathematical knowledge: Using cognitive developmental theory to inform curriculum design for pre-K-6 mathematics education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.2009.3.issue-210.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01060.x
Griffin, S. (2015). Number Worlds: A prevention/intervention math program for Grades PreK-8. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
Griffin, S., & Case, R. (1997). Re-thinking the primary school math curriculum: An approach based on cognitive science. Issues in Education, 3, 1–49.
Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1988). Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20, 1–7.
Kamii, C. (2000). Young children reinvent arithmetic: Implications of Piaget’s theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Kroeger, L. A., Brown, R. D., & O’Brien, B. A. (2012). Connecting neuroscience, cognitive, and educational theories and research to practice: A review of mathematics intervention programs. Early Education and Development, 23(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2012.617289
Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J., Fuchs, L., & Chhabra, V. (2006). Learning disabilities. In E. Marsh & R. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (3rd ed., pp. 512–594). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Räsänen, P., Salminen, J., Wilson, A. J., Aunio, P., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Computer-assisted intervention for children with low numeracy skills. Cognitive Development, 24, 450–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.003
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. New York, NY: Routledge.
Siegler, R. S. (1988). Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.117.3.258
Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114–145.
SRA Number Worlds: Research and efficacy. (2015). McGraw Hill Education. Retrieved from http://ecommerce-prod.mheducation.com.s3.amazonaws.com/unitas/school/program/number-worlds-2015/nw-2015-research-brochure.pdf
Swanson, H. L. (2008). Neuroscience and RTI: A complementary role. In E. Fletcher-Janzen & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention (pp. 28–53). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Torbeyns, J., Verschaffel, L., & Ghesquière, P. (2004). Strategy development in children with mathematical disabilities: Insights from the choice/no-choice method and the chronological-age/ability-level–match design. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370020301
Using the Number Worlds Placement Tests (n.d.). McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from http://ecommerce-prod.mheducation.com.s3.amazonaws.com/unitas/school/explore/sites/number-worlds/number-worlds-placement-tests-by-level.pdf
Vaidya, S. R. (2004). Understanding dyscalculia for teaching. Education, 124, 717–720.
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (7th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education Inc.
Wilson, A., & Dehaene, S. (2004). How it works: Scientific background. Retrieved from http://www.thenumberrace.com/nr/nr_bgnd.php?lang=en
Wilson, A. J., Revkin, S. K., Cohen, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2006). An open trial assessment of “The Number Race,” an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-2-20
Wright, R. J., Ellemor-Collins, D., & Tabor, P. D. (2012). Developing number knowledge: Assessment, teaching & intervention with 7-11 year-olds. London, England: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kroeger, L., Brown, R.D. (2018). Enhancing Mathematical Cognitive Development Through Educational Interventions. In: Neuroscience of Mathematical Cognitive Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76409-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76409-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76408-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76409-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)