Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 269))

Abstract

The outcomes from the previous chapters provide useful information from the literature of operations research and economics on measuring the performance of a set of homogenous firms with multiple input factors and multiple output factors as well as ranking and benchmarking firms. If firms are not homogenous, the situation is the same as when each factor has a different unit of measurement from one firm to another, and therefore, no meaningful discrimination can be expressed, unless the simple conditions of discrimination, which are represented in Sect. 2.3, are satisfied. In this chapter, the concepts introduced in the previous chapters are adapted with the literature and the philosophical background is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J., (2011). Handbook on data envelopment analysis (International series in operations research & management science, 2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toloo, M., (2014). Data envelopment analysis with selected models and applications. Series on Advanced Economic Issues, Faculty of Economics, VÅ B-TU, Ostrava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F. R., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1980). A survey of frontier production functions and of their relationship to efficiency measurement. Journal of econometrics, 13(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L. M., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis and Pareto-Koopmans empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O'Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 19, 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Lovell, C. K. (1978). Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic theory, 19(1), 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1985). Measurement of efficiency of production. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing Co., Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120, 253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F. R., & Hjalmarsson, L. (1974). On the measurement of productive efficiency. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 76, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khezrimotlagh, D. (2014). Profit efficiency by Kourosh and Arash model. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 8(24), 1165–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khezrimotlagh, D., Salleh, S., & Mohsenpour, Z. (2013). A new method for evaluating decision making units in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(1), 694–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. Activity analysis of production and allocation, 13, 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (1999). An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. European Journal of Operational Research, 115(3), 596–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(32), 73–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 130(3), 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2002). A strange case of the cost and allocative efficiencies in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53, 1225–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. (2014). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets (Vol. 213). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khezrimotlagh, D., Chen, Y. (2018). Data Envelopment Analysis. In: Decision Making and Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 269. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76345-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics