Advertisement

Tariffs, Quotas and the Ideal of Pan-European Harmonisation from 1996 to 2001

  • Béatrice Cointe
  • Alain Nadaï
Chapter
Part of the Progressive Energy Policy book series (PEP)

Abstract

This chapter is interested in the period corresponding to the elaboration of the Directive on the promotion of renewable electricity, from 1996 to 2001. It looks at debates about renewable electricity policy at the European Union level as they became more specific: as national renewable electricity policies developed and diversified, attention started to focus on instrument choice. Having described the range of instruments in use, Cointe and Nadaï take the opposition between FITs and TGCs as a vantage point to analyse the Commission’s vision and its discrepancies with national policies. They show how the Commission was guided by an ideal of harmonisation via the market that was not the priority in all Member States. They trace the emergence of similar debates in academic circles.

Keywords

Feed-in tariffs European Union Tradable Green Certificates Harmonisation 

References

  1. Bergek, Anna, and Staffan Jacobsson. 2010. Are tradable green certificates a cost-efficient policy driving technical change or a rent-generating machine? Lessons from Sweden 2003–2008. Energy Policy 38: 1255–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Branger, Frédéric, Oskar Lecuyer and Philippe Quirion. 2013. The European Union Emission Trading System: Should we throw the flagship out with the bath water? Working Paper 48, Paris: CIRED.Google Scholar
  3. Commission of the European Communities. 1996. Energy for the future: Renewable sources of energy. Green Paper for a Community strategy. Communication from the Commission. COM(96) 576 final. Brussels, 20 November 1996.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1997. Energy for the future: renewable sources of energy. White Paper for a Community Strategy and Action Plan. COM(97) 599 final. Brussels, 26 November 1997.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1998. Commission report to the Council and the European Parliament on Harmonization requirements. Directive 96/92 concerning rules for the internal market in electricity. COM(1998) 167, Brussels, 16 March 1998.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1999. Electricity from renewable energy sources and the internal electricity market. Commission working document. SEC(1999) 470 final, Brussels, 13 April 1999.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2004. The share of renewable energy in the EU. Commission report in accordance with Article 3 of Directive 2001/77/EC, evaluation of the effect of legislative instruments and other Community policies on the development of the contribution of renewable energy sources in the EU and proposals for concrete action. COM(2004) 366 final. Brussels, 26 May 2004.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2005. The support of electricity from renewable sources. Communication from the European Commission. COM(2005) 627 final. Brussels, 07 December 2005.Google Scholar
  9. European Court of Justice. 2001. PreussenElektra v. Schleswag. Judgement of the Court, 13 March 2001, Case C-379/98.Google Scholar
  10. European Parliament. 1996. Mombaur own-initiative report on a community action plan for renewable energy sources. Official Journal of the European Communities C 211. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:C:1996:211:FULL&from=EN. Accessed 21 Dec 2017.
  11. ———. 1998. Report on network access for renewable energies—Creating a European directive on the feeding in of electricity from renewable sources of energy in the European Union; rapporteur Linkohr. A4-0199 and 98, PE224.949.fin, 26 May.Google Scholar
  12. European Parliament and Council. 2001. Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity market. Official Journal of the European Communities L 283: 33–40.Google Scholar
  13. Finon, Dominique. 2008. L’inadéquation du mode de subvention du photovoltaïque à sa maturité technologique. Working Paper 2008–09, Paris: CIRED.Google Scholar
  14. Haas, Reinhaard, Gustav Resch, Christian Panzer, Sebastian Busch, Mario Ragwitz, and Anne Held. 2011. Efficiency and effectiveness of promotion systems for electricity generation from renewable energy sources—Lessons from EU countries. Energy 36: 2186–2193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hvelplund, Frede. 2001. Political prices or political quantities? A comparison of renewable energy support systems. New Energy 5: 18–23.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobsson, Staffan, Anne Bergek, Dominique Finon, Volkmar Lauber, Catherine Mitchell, David Toke, and Ariel Verbruggen. 2009. EU renewable energy support: Faith or facts? Energy Policy 37: 2143–2146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lauber, Volkmar. 2004. REFIT and RPS: Options for a harmonised Community framework. Energy Policy 32: 1405–1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00108-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lauber, Volkmar, and Elisa Schenner. 2011. The struggle over support schemes for renewable electricity in the European Union: A discursive-institutionalist analysis. Environmental Politics 19: 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.589578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lecuyer, Oskar, and Philippe Quirion. 2013. Can uncertainty justify overlapping policy instruments to mitigate emissions? Ecological Economics 93: 177–191. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2192517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lipp, Judith. 2007. Lessons for effective renewable energy policies from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 35: 5481–5495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ménanteau, Philippe, Dominique Finon, and Marie-Laure Lamy. 2003. Prices versus quantities: Choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy 31: 799–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00133-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer, Niels I. 2003. European schemes for promoting renewables in liberalised markets. Energy Policy 31: 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00151-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell, Catherine, Janet Sawin, Govind R. Pokharel, Daniel Kammen, Zhongying Wang, Solomne Fifita, Mark Jaccard, Ole Langniss, Hugo Lucas, Alain Nadai, et al. 2011. Policy, financing and implementation. In IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation, ed. Ottmar Edenhofer, Ramon PichsMadruga, Youba Sokona, Kristin Seyboth, Patrick Matschoss, Susanne Kadner, Timm Zwickel, Patrick Eickemeier, Gerrit Hansen, Steffen Schlömer, and Christoph von Stechow. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Muniesa, Fabian, Liliana Doganova, Horacio Ortiz, Alvaro Pina-Stranger, Florence Paterson, Alaric Bourgoin, Vera Ehrenstein, Pierre-André Juven, David Pontille, Başac Saraç-Lesavre, and Guillaume Yon. 2017. Capitalization: A cultural guide. Paris: Presses des Mines.Google Scholar
  25. Weitzman, Martin L. 1974. Price vs. quantities. The Review of Economic Studies 41: 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Béatrice Cointe
    • 1
  • Alain Nadaï
    • 2
  1. 1.TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.CIRED-CNRS (Centre International de Recherche sur l’Environnement et le Développement)Nogent-sur-MarneFrance

Personalised recommendations