FITs and European Renewable Energy Policy Before 1996: A Tale of Two Beginnings

  • Béatrice Cointe
  • Alain Nadaï
Chapter
Part of the Progressive Energy Policy book series (PEP)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the period between the late 1970s and the adoption of the Directive on the internal electricity market in 1996. This period saw the appearance of feed-in tariffs as well as the emergence of a European Union approach to renewable energy policy, though without direct connections between the two. Cointe and Nadaï retrace the origins of FITs, starting from their introduction in Germany and Denmark as a tool to integrate wind power into existing electricity systems and showing how they turned into renewable energy support instruments. They then analyse early European renewable energy policy, stressing that it was guided by the ideal of a liberalised market as a device for economic and social optimisation.

Keywords

Feed-in tariffs European Union Renewable energy policy Internal electricity market External costs 

References

  1. Commission of the European Communities. 1993. Growth, competitiveness, employment: The challenges and ways forward into the 21st century. White Paper. COM(93) 700. Brussels, December.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1995a. For a European Union energy policy. Green Paper. COM(94) 659 final. Brussels, 11 January 1995.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1995b. An energy policy for the European Union. White Paper. COM(95) 682 final. Brussels, 13 December1995.Google Scholar
  4. European Council. 1986. Council resolution of 16 September 1986 concerning new Community energy policy objectives for 1995 and convergence of the policies of the Member States. Official Journal of the European Communities C 241: 1–3.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1988. Council recommendation of 9 June 1988 on developing the exploitation of renewable energy sources in the Community. Official Journal of the European Communities L 160: 46–48.Google Scholar
  6. European Court of Justice. 2000. Opinion of advocate general Jacobs delivered on 26 October 2000, Case C-379/98 PreussenElektra v. Schleswag.Google Scholar
  7. European Parliament and Council. 1996. Directive 96/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 1996 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity. Official Journal of the European Communities L 027: 20–29.Google Scholar
  8. Evrard, Aurélien. 2010. L’intégration des énergies renouvelables aux politiques publiques en Europe. Ph.D. thesis, Sciences Po Paris, Paris.Google Scholar
  9. Extern-E. 2010. Extern-E Externalities of Energy—A Research Project of the European Commission. http://www.externe.info/externe_2006/exterpols.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2017, last modified 5 Oct 2010, consulted.
  10. Haas, Reinhaard, Gustav Resch, Christian Panzer, Sebastian Busch, Mario Ragwitz, and Anne Held. 2011. Efficiency and effectiveness of promotion systems for electricity generation from renewable energy sources—Lessons from EU countries. Energy 36: 2186–2193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaffe, Adam B., and Robert N. Stavins. 1995. Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: The effects of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: S43–S63. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lauber, Volkmar, and Lutz Mez. 2004. Three decades of renewable electricity policies in Germany. Energy and Environment 15: 599–623. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305042259792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lesser, Jonathan A., and Xuejuan Su. 2008. Design of an economically efficient feed-in structure for renewable energy development. Energy Policy 36: 981–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lipp, Judith. 2007. Lessons for effective renewable energy policies from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 35: 5481–5495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loiter, Jeffrey M., and Vicki Norberg-Bohm. 1999. Technology policy and renewable energy: Public roles in the development of new energy technologies. Energy Policy 27: 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(99)00013-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ménanteau, Philippe, Dominique Finon, and Marie-Laure Lamy. 2003. Prices versus quantities: Choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy 31: 799–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00133-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyer, Niels I. 2004. Renewable energy policy in Denmark. Energy for Sustainable Development 8: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Norberg-Bohm, Vicki. 1999. Stimulating green technological innovation: An analysis of alternative policy mechanisms. Policy Sciences 32: 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004384913598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sandén, Björn A., and Christian Azar. 2005. Near-term technology policies or long-term climate targets? Economy-wide versus technology-specific approaches. Energy Policy 33: 1557–1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.01.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Unruh, Gregory C. 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28: 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 2002. Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 30: 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00098-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wiser, Ryan H., and Steven J. Pickle. 1998. Financing investments in renewable energy: The impacts of policy design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2: 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(98)00007-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Béatrice Cointe
    • 1
  • Alain Nadaï
    • 2
  1. 1.TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.CIRED-CNRS (Centre International de Recherche sur l’Environnement et le Développement)Nogent-sur-MarneFrance

Personalised recommendations