Abstract
This paper seeks to foster a conceptual discussion about the relationship between organizational culture and strategy. Organizations must find ways to handle global, national, market, technological and consumer demands whilst crafting relevant strategies to their internal workings and cultures. When the strategies of organizations are misaligned with market realities, the survival rate rapidly decreases. We suggest that the culture of organizations offer an anchor dictating how organizations perceive themselves, their surroundings, their customers and relevant stakeholders. The assumptions, beliefs and values determine how companies comprehend what is happening inside and outside the organization while dominating the strategy formulation and execution process. In a culture where change is avoided, prompt adaptation to market changes could be painful if not impossible. Thus, we propose that organizational culture can be utilized as a bridge for aligning inner realities of organizations with demands of the outer domain. Essentially, we suggest that organizations’ internal values and culture are generally not aligned with their strategic positions and that the focus of organizations need to be on a “fit” which will create a “competitive cultural persona” supporting the strategic posture in the marketplace. Such a “fit” will enable organizations to deploy resources effectively and manage information flow smoothly.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achrol, R. S. (1991). Evolution of the marketing organization: New forms for turbulent environments. Journal of Marketing, 55, 77–93.
Anderson, P. (1999). Perspective: Complexity theory and organization science. Organization science, 10(3), 216–232.
Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review., 11(3), 656–665.
Black, J., & Farias, G. (1997). Genesis of complexity cycles. In Eighth Annual International Conference of the Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Sciences. Boston, MA: Boston University.
Carter, W. R. (2015). Ambidexterity deconstructed: A hierarchy of capabilities perspective. Management Research Review, 38(8), 794–812.
Conner, D. R. (1998). Leading at the edge of chaos: How to create the nimble organization. New York: Wiley.
Duncan, R. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Killman, L. R. Pondy, & D. Sleven (Eds.), The management of organization (pp. 167–188). New York: North Holland.
Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publication Company.
Galbraith, J. R. (1994). Competing with flexible lateral organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publication Company.
Galbraith, J. R. (1995). Designing organizations: An executive briefing on strategy, structure and process. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
Glass, N. (1996). Chaos, non-linear systems and day-to-day management. European Management Journal, 14, 98–105.
Goold, M., & Campbell, A. (2002). Designing effective organizations. New York: Wiley.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Hammer, M. (1996). Beyond reengineering: How the process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Hodgkinson, G. P. (1997). Cognitive inertia in a turbulent market: The case of UK residential real estate agents. Journal of Management Studies, 34(6), 921–945.
Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86, 50–59.
Kotter, J. P. (1995, March–April). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 59–67.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Lane, D., & Maxfield, R. (1996). Strategy under complexity: Fostering generative relationships. Long Range Planning, 29, 215–231.
Lawler, E. E., III. (1994). From job-based to competency-based organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 3–15.
Lewin K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics. In: Catwright D (ed) Field theory in social science. Social Science Paperbacks, London, pp 143–153
Loewen, J. (1997). The power of strategy: A practical guide for South African managers. Sandton: Zebra.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
Merry, U. (1995). Coping with uncertainty: Insights from the new sciences of chaos, self-organization, and complexity. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Mohrman, S. A., & Cummings, T. G. (1989). Self-designing organizations: Learning how to create high performance. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M., Jr. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Mohrman, S. A., Galbraith, J. R., Lawler, E. E., III, & Associates. (1998). Tomorrow’s organization: Crafting winning capabilities in a dynamic world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Nadler, D. A., Gerstein, M. S., Shaw, R. B., & Associates. (1992). Organizational architecture: Designs for changing organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Schreiber, C., & Carley, K. M. (2006). Leadership style as an enabler of organizational complex functioning. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8, 61–76.
Smith, A., & Fingar, P. (2003). Business process management: The third wave. Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press.
Spanyi, A. (2006). More for less: The power of process management. Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press.
Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Nueva York: McGraw Hill.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alpay, G., Büyükbalcı, P., Dülger, M. (2018). How Are Strategy and Organizational Culture Related? A Conceptual Discussion. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Consumer Behavior, Organizational Strategy and Financial Economics. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76288-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76288-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76287-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76288-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)