Skip to main content

How Are Strategy and Organizational Culture Related? A Conceptual Discussion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Consumer Behavior, Organizational Strategy and Financial Economics

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 9))

  • 1429 Accesses

Abstract

This paper seeks to foster a conceptual discussion about the relationship between organizational culture and strategy. Organizations must find ways to handle global, national, market, technological and consumer demands whilst crafting relevant strategies to their internal workings and cultures. When the strategies of organizations are misaligned with market realities, the survival rate rapidly decreases. We suggest that the culture of organizations offer an anchor dictating how organizations perceive themselves, their surroundings, their customers and relevant stakeholders. The assumptions, beliefs and values determine how companies comprehend what is happening inside and outside the organization while dominating the strategy formulation and execution process. In a culture where change is avoided, prompt adaptation to market changes could be painful if not impossible. Thus, we propose that organizational culture can be utilized as a bridge for aligning inner realities of organizations with demands of the outer domain. Essentially, we suggest that organizations’ internal values and culture are generally not aligned with their strategic positions and that the focus of organizations need to be on a “fit” which will create a “competitive cultural persona” supporting the strategic posture in the marketplace. Such a “fit” will enable organizations to deploy resources effectively and manage information flow smoothly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achrol, R. S. (1991). Evolution of the marketing organization: New forms for turbulent environments. Journal of Marketing, 55, 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1999). Perspective: Complexity theory and organization science. Organization science, 10(3), 216–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review., 11(3), 656–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J., & Farias, G. (1997). Genesis of complexity cycles. In Eighth Annual International Conference of the Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Sciences. Boston, MA: Boston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, W. R. (2015). Ambidexterity deconstructed: A hierarchy of capabilities perspective. Management Research Review, 38(8), 794–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, D. R. (1998). Leading at the edge of chaos: How to create the nimble organization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Killman, L. R. Pondy, & D. Sleven (Eds.), The management of organization (pp. 167–188). New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publication Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. (1994). Competing with flexible lateral organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publication Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. (1995). Designing organizations: An executive briefing on strategy, structure and process. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, N. (1996). Chaos, non-linear systems and day-to-day management. European Management Journal, 14, 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goold, M., & Campbell, A. (2002). Designing effective organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. (1996). Beyond reengineering: How the process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P. (1997). Cognitive inertia in a turbulent market: The case of UK residential real estate agents. Journal of Management Studies, 34(6), 921–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86, 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1995, March–April). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D., & Maxfield, R. (1996). Strategy under complexity: Fostering generative relationships. Long Range Planning, 29, 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., III. (1994). From job-based to competency-based organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics. In: Catwright D (ed) Field theory in social science. Social Science Paperbacks, London, pp 143–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, J. (1997). The power of strategy: A practical guide for South African managers. Sandton: Zebra.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merry, U. (1995). Coping with uncertainty: Insights from the new sciences of chaos, self-organization, and complexity. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S. A., & Cummings, T. G. (1989). Self-designing organizations: Learning how to create high performance. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M., Jr. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S. A., Galbraith, J. R., Lawler, E. E., III, & Associates. (1998). Tomorrow’s organization: Crafting winning capabilities in a dynamic world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A., Gerstein, M. S., Shaw, R. B., & Associates. (1992). Organizational architecture: Designs for changing organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, C., & Carley, K. M. (2006). Leadership style as an enabler of organizational complex functioning. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Fingar, P. (2003). Business process management: The third wave. Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanyi, A. (2006). More for less: The power of process management. Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Nueva York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alpay, G., Büyükbalcı, P., Dülger, M. (2018). How Are Strategy and Organizational Culture Related? A Conceptual Discussion. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Consumer Behavior, Organizational Strategy and Financial Economics. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76288-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics