Smartphone Adoption: Design of Factors Within the Framework of Theory of Consumption Values

Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 9)

Abstract

After the initial feature mobile phone adoption, there is a widespread smartphone proliferation. The Theory of Consumption Values (TCV) is a marketing theory that explains purchase behavior of consumer goods and services. The framework consists of functional, social, epistemic, hedonic, and conditional values; the latter being functional and/or social values present only in a specific situation. TCV is used in mobile device adoption literature disproportionably more often than in other fields. However, virtually all TCV studies focused on smartphones are qualitative. The aim of this research is to design factors which could be later used in quantitative studies. These factors are identified using principal component analysis. With regards to the results, there were five factors identified for functional values, six factors for social values, three factor for epistemic values, four factors for hedonic values, and seven factors for conditional values.

Keywords

Adoption Smartphone Theory of consumption values 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank Gregory Brant Gimpel, Georgia State University, J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Department of Computer Information Systems, who provided statements from his unpublished research.

References

  1. Haba, H. F., Hassan, Z., & Dastane, O. (2017). Factors leading to consumer perceived value of smartphones and its impact on purchase intention. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 9(1), 42–71.Google Scholar
  2. Hollensen, S. (2016). Global marketing (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
  3. Jung, Y. (2014). What a smartphone is to me: Understanding user values in using smartphones. Information Systems Journal, 24(4), 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., & Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control (in Japanese), 14(2), 39–48.Google Scholar
  5. Kim, Y. H., Kim, D. J., & Wachter, K. (2013). A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): Engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued intention. Decision Support Systems, 56(1), 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Harris, L. C., & Piercy, N. (2017). Principles of marketing (7th European ed.). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
  7. Lay-Yee, K. L., Kok-Siew, H., & Yin-Fah, B. C. (2013). Factors affecting smartphone purchase decision among Malaysian generation Y. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(12), 2426–2440.Google Scholar
  8. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rahim, A., Safin, S. Z., Kheng, L. K., Abas, N., & Ali, S. M. (2016). Factors influencing purchasing intention of smartphone among university students. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  11. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1990). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Yeh, C.-H., Wang, Y.-S., & Yieh, K. (2016). Predictive smartphone brand loyalty: Consumer value and consumer – brand identification perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Commercial EntrepreneurshipUniversity of Economics BratislavaKošiceSlovakia
  2. 2.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of Chemistry and TechnologyPrahaCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Business and ManagementAalborg UniversityCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations