Ignition Mechanisms

  • Sayan Biswas
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


As described in the literature review section in the previous chapter, there exists a knowledge gap how ignition initiates by a hot turbulent jet. What are the ignition mechanisms from a fundamental point of view? What are the nondimensional parameters governing the ignition mechanism? To explore the fundamental ignition mechanisms by a hot turbulent jet, an experimental setup was built that uses a dual-chamber design (a small pre-chamber resided within the big main chamber). Two fuels, methane and hydrogen, were studied. Simultaneous high-speed schlieren and OH* chemiluminescence imaging were applied to visualize the jet penetration and ignition processes. It was found there exist two ignition mechanisms – flame ignition and jet ignition. A parametric study was conducted to understand the effects of several parameters on the ignition mechanism and probability, including orifice diameter, initial temperature and pressure, fuel/air equivalence ratios in both chambers, and pre-chamber spark position. The mean and fluctuation velocities of the transient hot jet were calculated according to the measured pressure histories in the two chambers. A limiting global Damköhler number was found for each fuel, under which the ignition probability is nearly zero. Lastly, the ignition outcome of all tests (no ignition, flame ignition, and jet ignition) was marked on the classical turbulent combustion regime diagram. These results provide important guidelines for design and optimization of efficient and reliable pre-chambers for natural gas engines.


  1. 1.
    Smith, G.P., et al.: Low pressure flame determinations of rate constants for OH(A) and CH(A) chemiluminescence. Combust. Flame. 131(1), 59–69 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luque, J., et al.: CH(A-X) and OH(A-X) optical emission in an axisymmetric laminar diffusion flame. Combust. Flame. 122(1), 172–175 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Orain, M., Hardalupas, Y.: Measurements of local mixture fraction of reacting mixture in swirl-stabilised natural gas-fuelled burners. Appl. Phys. B. 105(2), 435–449 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elhsnawi, M., Teodorczyk, A.: Studies of mixing and ignition in hydrogen-oxygen mixture with hot inert gas injection. In: Proceedings of the European Combustion Meeting. Warsaw University of Technology ITC, Nowowiejska, Warszawa (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sadanandan, R., et al.: 2D mixture fraction studies in a hot-jet ignition configuration using NO-LIF and correlation analysis. Flow Turb. Combust. 86(1), 45–62 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sadanandan, R., et al.: Detailed investigation of ignition by hot gas jets. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31(1), 719–726 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iida, N., Kawaguchi, O., Sato, G.T.: Premixed flame propagating into a narrow channel at a high speed, part 2: transient behavior of the properties of the flowing gas inside the channel. Combust. Flame. 60(3), 257–267 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Law, C.K.: Combustion Physics, vol. xviii, p. 722. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA/New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crane Co: Engineering Division. In: Flow of Fluids through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe. Crane Company Technical paper. Crane Co, Chicago (1957)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peters, N.: Turbulent combustion. In: Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics, vol. xvi, p. 304. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA/New York (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reaction Design: Reaction Workbench 15131 San Diego (2013)
  12. 12.
    Debonis, J.R., Scott, J.N.: Large-Eddy simulation of a turbulent compressible round jet. AIAA J. 40(7), 1346–1354 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Uzun, A., Hussaini, M.Y.: Investigation of high frequency noise generation in the near-nozzle region of a jet using large eddy simulation. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 21(4), 291–321 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iglesias, I., et al.: Numerical analyses of deflagration initiation by a hot jet. Combust. Theory Modell. 16(6), 994–1010 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carpio, J., et al.: Critical radius for hot-jet ignition of hydrogen–air mixtures. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 38(7), 3105–3109 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Borghi, R.P.: On the structure and morphology of turbulent premixed flames. In: Casci, C. (ed.) Recent Advances in the Aerospace Sciences, pp. 117–138. Springer, Boston (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peters, N.: Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion. Int. Symp. Combust. 21(1), 1231–1250 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abdel-Gayed, R.G., Bradley, D., Lung, F.K.K.: Combustion regimes and the straining of turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Flame. 76(2), 213–218 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Poinsot, T., Veynante, D., Candel, S.: Diagrams of premixed turbulent combustion based on direct simulation. Int. Symp. Combust. 23(1), 613–619 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Williams, F.A.: Combustion theory: the fundamental theory of chemically reacting flow systems. In: Combustion Science and Engineering Series, vol. xxiii, 2nd edn, p. 680. Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co, Menlo Park (1985)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen, Y.C., et al.: The detailed flame structure of highly stretched turbulent premixed methane-air flames. Combust. Flame. 107(3), 223–244 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen, Y.C., Mansour, M.S.: Measurements of the detailed flame structure in turbulent H2-Ar jet diffusion flames with line-Raman/Rayleigh/LIPF-OH technique. Int. Symp. Combust. 26(1), 97–103 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sayan Biswas
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Aeronautics and AstronauticsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations