Skip to main content

Information Asymmetry, Liquidity and the Dynamic Volume-Return Relation in Panel Data Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Contemporary Trends and Challenges in Finance

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

  • 553 Accesses

Abstract

In the paper we investigate the dynamic relation between returns and volume of individual stocks traded on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Theoretical models, such as the one proposed by Wang (J Polit Econ 102(1):127–167, 1994) suggest that this relation reveals the information asymmetry in the market and the role of private information. According to the models, the trade generated by risk-sharing and public information tends to decrease autocorrelation of returns, while the trade generated by private information has the opposite effect. To test this empirically we compared the coefficients obtained from the return-volume relation with other approximations of information asymmetry, based on liquidity. Unlike other works we have used dynamic regression to obtain the coefficients for 52 stocks, assuming that coefficients for individual stock can vary from month to month. Then we used panel regression with random effects to test the relationship between coefficient of information asymmetry and liquidity. We find an evidence supporting the compliance of measure of information asymmetry, especially for medium and small capitalization companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for example Petris et al. (2009) Chap. 2 or Cowpertwait and Metcalfe (2009), Chap. 12.

References

  • Amihud Y (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. J Financ Mark 5(1):31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amihud Y, Mendelson H (1986) Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. J Financ Econ 17(2):223–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniewicz RL (1993) Relative volume and subsequent stock price movements. Working paper, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagehot W (1971) The only game in town. Financ Anal J 27(2):12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume L, Easley D, O’Hara M (1994) Market statistics and technical analysis: the role of volume. J Financ 49(1):153–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland TE (1979) Liquidity changes following stock splits. J Financ 34(1):115–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowpertwait PSP, Metcalfe AV (2009) Introductory time series with R. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Datar VT, Naik YN, Radcliffe R (1998) Liquidity and stock returns: an alternative test. J Financ Mark 1(2):203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesmond DA, Ogden JP, Trzcinka CA (1999) A new estimate of transaction costs. Rev Financ Stud 12(5):1113–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W (2006) A liquidity-augmented capital asset pricing model. J Financ Econ 82(3):631–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorente G, Michaely R, Saar G, Wang J (2002) Dynamic volume-return relation of individual stocks. Rev Financ Stud 15(4):1005–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck J (1991) Measuring the information content of stock trades. J Financ 46(1):179–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck J, Seppi DJ (2001) Common factors in prices, order flows, and liquidity. J Financ Econ 59(3):383–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petris G, Petrone S, Campagnoli P (2009) Dynamic linear models with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Su Y, Huang H (2004) Information asymmetry and volume-return relation. Proceedings of the NTU conference in Finance, National Taiwan University

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Duong HN, Singh H (2014) Information asymmetry, trade size and dynamic volume-return relation: evidence from Australian Securities Exchange. Financ Rev 49(3):539–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll HR (1989) Inferring the components of the bid-ask spread: theory and empirical tests. J Financ 44(1):115–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stickel SE, Verrecchia RE (1994) Evidence that trading volume sustains stock price changes. Financ Anal J 50(6):57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (1994) A model of competitive stock trading volume. J Polit Econ 102(1):127–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paweł Kliber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Garsztka, P., Kliber, P. (2018). Information Asymmetry, Liquidity and the Dynamic Volume-Return Relation in Panel Data Analysis. In: Jajuga, K., Locarek-Junge, H., Orlowski, L. (eds) Contemporary Trends and Challenges in Finance. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76228-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics