The mini-gastric bypass or one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) is now growing rapidly in popularity as a safe and effective procedure, with excellent control of weight and co-morbidities in long-term evaluations. Worldwide, it seems to have an important place in the bariatric armamentarium, being better or, at least, as good as the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).
However, there are some significant clinical issues. “Biliary reflux”, “marginal ulcer” or excessive weight loss need better understanding, leading to improved treatment.
We found that by adding a Roux-en-Y diversion to the MGB-OAGB cases which had pathologic post-operative reflux, we were giving patients a very comfortable and effective solution. Thus, in 2013, we decided to do the same in some primary patients who we knew were at risk for gastro-esophageal reflux. We got the same good outcomes.
Diverted mini-gastric bypass (dMGB) is now an established technique in our practice, in about one-third of the patients who receive a gastric bypass. Here we describe the rationale of the concept, the surgical technique and the clinical outcomes of the first 300 patients of our series.
Prachand V, Da Vee R, Alverdy J. Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super obese [BMI >50] compared to gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;244:611–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:20–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, Daher R, Antoun NA, Nasr M. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22:697–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, Guenzi M, Berger A, Chevallier JM. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:321–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOMSS Position Statement on Mini Gastric Bypass September 2014, review date September 2016.Google Scholar
Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, Ortiz-de-Solórzano J, Pérez-Miranda M, Castro-Alija MJ. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos A, Silva A, Ramos M, Canseco E, Galvão-Neto M, Menezes M, Galvão T, Bastos E. Simplified gastric bypass: 13 years of experience and 12,000 patients operated. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27(Suppl 1):2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang L, Tan WH, Chang R, Eagon JC. Perioperative risk and complications of revisional bariatric surgery compared to primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1316–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroh C, Weiner R, Wolff S, Knoll C, Manger T. Revisional surgery and reoperations in obesity and metabolic surgery: Data analysis of the German bariatric surgery registry 2005-2012. Chirurg. 2015;86:346–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanidis D, Malireddy K, Kuwada T, Phillips R, Zoog E, Gersin KS. Revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative morbidity is determined by type of procedure. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4504–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro R. Revisional surgery: an inevitable practice. Obesity: Open Access: Editorial Volume: 2.2 (ISSN 2380–5528).1.Google Scholar
Paredes B, Guerra A, Manaça L, Pereira J, Ribeiro R, Viveiros O. What’s the best REDO? BMI 4.5.10 (600–609).Google Scholar