Abstract
In the light of results of qualitative fieldwork carried out with children and young people within the MYWeB project, in this chapter, we follow three themes: (1) That the problem of attrition in quantitative surveys has to be understood and tackled qualitatively; (2) That the issue of attrition in longitudinal quantitative studies relates not just the fact that the sample gets smaller and the results less robust over time, but also because the people who drop out of studies generally possess the very characteristics of the group for which the survey itself was ultimately developed; (3) That it is important to ensure that young people themselves are participating in the research project’s design and implementation. This chapter considers strategies for motivating those groups to participate in research on well-being from a longitudinal perspective. Topics and strategies discussed include data-collection processes, the use of incentives, the use of particular strategies to ensure the presence of certain social groups, and feedback on the impact of the research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The proofreading of this chapter was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, project reference «UID/SOC/03126/2013»
- 2.
People with very high and very low SES show fewer propensities to participate in longitudinal studies (Groves and Couper 1998).
- 3.
That is, young people that are not involved with any political, environmental, social or voluntary organization, association, activity or cause in a systematic way or through formal membership.
- 4.
Computer Assisted Personal Interview.
- 5.
Computer Assisted Telephone Interview.
- 6.
Computer Assisted Web Interview.
References
Almeida, A. N. de, Carvalho, D., Delicado, A., & Alves, N. d. A. (2012). Pela mão das crianças: Metodologias em construção. InAtas do VII Congresso Português de Sociologia. Porto: Junho.
Almeida, A. N. de, Carvalho, D., & Delicado, A. (2017). Accessing children’s digital practices at home through visual methods: Innovations and challenges. In I. E. Castro, M. Swauger, & B. Harger (Eds.), Researching children and youth: Methodological issues, strategies, and innovations (pp. 349–374). London: Emerald.
Alves, N. de A., & Nico, M. (2015). Portuguese report on interviews and focus groups from delivery partners, WP4: Direct engagement with children and young people (CYP).
Bagnoli, A., & Clark, A. (2014). Focus groups with young people: A participatory approach to research planning. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(1), 101–119.
Ben-Arieh, A. (2014). From child welfare to children well-being: What can we learn from children? Communication presented at the 2014 Hokenstad international lecture 60th CSWE 2014 Annual Program Meeting (APM); October 23–26, 2014, Tampa, Florida.
Bonevski, B., Randell, M., Paul, C., Chapman, K., Twyman, L., Bryant, J., Brozek, I., & Hughes, C. (2014, March 25). Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC medical research methodology, 14, 42.
Bourdieu, P. (1985). Social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723–744.
Cumming, J., & Goldstein, H. (2015). Handling attrition and non-response in longitudinal data with an application to a study of Australian youth. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 7(1), 53–63.
Derosas, R. (2004). A family affair: Marriage, mobility, and living arrangements in nineteenth-century Venice, 1850–1869. In F. van Poppel, M. Oris, & J. Lee (Eds.), The road to independence. Leaving home in Western and Eastern societies, 16th–20th centuries. Bern: Peter Lang European Academic Publishers.
Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (1998). An analysis of sample attrition in panel data. The Michigan panel study of income dynamics. The Journal of Human Resources, 33(2), 251–299.
Goldstein, H. (2009). Handling attrition and non-response in longitudinal data. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 1(1), 63–75.
Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. P. (1998). Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: Wiley.
Hanafin, S., Brooks, A. M., Roche, G., & Meaney, B. (2014). Methodological and ethical issues arising in carrying out research with children and young people. In R. Tourangeau, B. Edwards, T. P. Johnson, K. M. Wolter, & N. Bates (Eds.), Hard-to-survey populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoogendoorn, A., Lamers, F., Penninx, B., & Smit, J. (2013). Does a stepped approach using mixed-mode data collection reduce attrition problems in a longitudinal mental health study? Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 4(3), 242–257.
Laurie, H., & Lynn, P. (2009). The use of respondent incentives on longitudinal surveys. In P. Lynn (Ed.), Methodology of longitudinal surveys. Chichester: Wiley.
Lepkowski, J. M., & Couper, M. P. (2002). Nonresponse in the second wave of longitudinal household surveys. In R. M. Groves et al. (Eds.), Survey nonresponse. New York: Wiley.
Lessof, C. (2009). Ethical issues in longitudinal surveys. In P. Lynn (Ed.), Methodology of longitudinal surveys. Chichester: Wiley.
Mason, J. (2006). Six strategies for mixing methods and linking data in social science research. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. http://www.brown.uk.com/teaching/HEST5001/strategiesformixingmethods.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2017.
McGinley, P., Zhang, L., Hanks, L., & O’Neill, J. (2015). Reducing longitudinal attrition through Facebook. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 24(8), 894–900.
Mostafa, T., & Wiggins, R. (2015). The impact of attrition and non response in birthcohorts studies: A need to incorporate missingness strategies. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 6(2), 131–146.
Nicoletti, C., & Peracchi, F. (2002). A cross-country comparison of survey nonparticipation in the ECHP (ISER Working Papers, No. 2002–32). Colchester: University of Essex.
Olsen, R. (2005, February). The problem of respondent attrition: Survey methodology is key. Labor. Monthly Review, 128(2), 64–70.
Plewis, I. (2007). Non-response in a birth cohort study: The case of the millennium cohort study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10, 325–334.
Roberts, S. (2011). Beyond ‘NEET’ and ‘tidy’ pathways: Considering the missing middle of youth transitions studies. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(1), 21–49.
Shaghaghi, A., Bhopal, R. S., & Sheikh, A. (2011). Approaches to recruiting ‘hard-to-reach’ populations into research: A review of the literature. Health Promotion Perspectives, 1(2), 86–94.
Smith, P., Lynn, P., & Elliot, D. (2009). Sample design for longitudinal surveys. In P. Lynn (Ed.), Methodology of longitudinal surveys. Chichester: Wiley.
Soler-i-Martí, R., & Ferrer-Fons, M. (2015). Youth participation in context: The impact of youth transition regimes on political action strategies in Europe. The Sociological Review, 63, 92–117.
Uhrig, N. (2008). The nature and causes of attrition in the British household panel survey. Institute for Social and Economic Research. No. 2008–05.
Wall, K., Almeida, A. N., Vieira, M. M., Cunha, V., (coords.), Rodrigues, L., Coelho, F., Leitão, M., & Atalaia, S. (2015). Impactos da crise nas crianças portuguesas: Indicadores, Políticas, Representações. Lisbon: Imprensa das Ciências Sociais.
Watson, D. (2003). Sample attrition between waves 1 and 5 in the European Community household panel. European Sociological Review, 19(4), 361–378.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nico, M., de Almeida Alves, N., Ferrer-Fons, M., Serracant, P., Soler-i-Martí, R. (2018). Methodological Challenges When Involving Children and Young People in Survey Research on Well-Being. In: Pollock, G., Ozan, J., Goswami, H., Rees, G., Stasulane, A. (eds) Measuring Youth Well-being. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76063-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76063-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76062-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76063-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)