Performances of Poisson–Gamma Model for Patients’ Recruitment in Clinical Trials When There Are Pauses in Recruitment or When the Number of Centres is Small

  • Nathan Minois
  • Guillaume Mijoule
  • Stéphanie Savy
  • Valérie Lauwers-Cances
  • Sandrine Andrieu
  • Nicolas Savy
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 231)

Abstract

To predict the duration of a clinical trial is a question of paramount interest. To date, the more elaborated model is the so-called Poisson–gamma model introduced by Anisimov and Fedorov in 2007. Theoretical performances of this model are asymptotic and have been established under assumptions especially on the recruitment rates by centre which are assumed to be constant in time. In order to evaluate the practical use of this model, ranges of validity have to be assessed. By means of simulation studies, authors investigate, on the one hand, the impact of the number of centres involved, of the average recruitment rate, of the duration of recruitment and of the interim time of analysis on the expected duration of the trial and, on the other hand, two strategies of estimation of the trial duration accounting for breaks in recruitment (period during which centres do not recruit) which are compared and discussed. These investigations yield to guidelines on the use of Poisson–gamma processes to model recruitment dynamics regarding these issues.

Keywords

Clinical trials Recruitment time Bayesian statistics Cox processes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has received the help from IRESP during the call for proposals launched in 2012 as a part of French “Cancer Plan 2009–2013”.

References

  1. 1.
    Anisimov, V.V.: Using mixed Poisson models in patient recruitment in multicentre clinical trials. In: Proceegings of the World Congress on Ingineering, vol. II, pp. 1046–1049. London, United Kingdom (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anisimov, V.V.: Predictive modelling of recruitment and drug supply in multicenter clinical trials. In: Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meeting, ASA, pp. 1248–1259. Washington, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anisimov, V.V.: Recruitment modeling and predicting in clinical trials. Pharm. Outsourcing 10, 44–48 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anisimov, V.V.: Effects of unstratified and centre-stratified randomization in multi-centre clinical trials. Pharm. Stat. 10, 50–59 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anisimov, V.V.: Predictive event modelling in multicentre clinical trials with waiting time to response. Pharm. Stat. 10, 517–522 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anisimov, V.V.: Statistical modeling of clinical trials (recruitment and randomization). Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 40, 3684–3699 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anisimov, V.V., Fedorov, V.V.: Modelling, prediction and adaptive adjustment of recruitment in multicentre trials. Stat. Med. 26, 4958–4975 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anisimov, V.V., Downing, D., Fedorov, V.V.: Recruitment in multicentre trials: prediction and adjustment. In: 8th International Workshop in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis, pp. 1–8. Physica-Verlag/Springer, Heidelberg, Almagro, Spain (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barnard, K.D., Dent, L., Cook, A.: A systematic review of models to predict recruitment to multicentre trials. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 63 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carter, R.E.: Application of stochastic processes to participant recruitment in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials 25, 429–436 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, Y.J.: Interim recruitment goals in clinical trials. J. Chronic Dis. 36, 379–389 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mijoule, G., Savy, S., Savy, N.: Models for patients’ recruitment in clinical trials and sensitivity analysis. Stat. Med. 31(16), 1655–1674 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Minois, N., Savy, S., Lauwers-Cances, V., Andrieu, S., Savy, N.: Poisson-gamma model for patients’ recruitment in clinical trials with breaks in recruitment dynamic. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 5, 144–152 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morgan, T.M.: Nonparametric estimation of duration of accrual and total study length for clinical trials. Biometrics 43, 903–912 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rojavin, M.: Patient recruitment and retention: from art to science. Contemp. Clin. Trials 30, 387–387 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Senn, S.: Some controversies in planning and analysing multi-centre trials. In: Statistics in Medicine, pp. 1753–1765 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathan Minois
    • 1
  • Guillaume Mijoule
    • 2
  • Stéphanie Savy
    • 1
  • Valérie Lauwers-Cances
    • 3
  • Sandrine Andrieu
    • 1
    • 4
  • Nicolas Savy
    • 5
  1. 1.INSERM UMR 1027University of Toulouse IIIToulouseFrance
  2. 2.University of Paris XIOrsayFrance
  3. 3.Epidemiology UnitCHU PurpanToulouseFrance
  4. 4.Epidemiology Unit of Toulouse CHUToulouseFrance
  5. 5.Toulouse Institute of MathematicsUniversity of Toulouse IIIToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations