Advertisement

Life Annuity Portfolios: Risk-Adjusted Valuations and Suggestions on the Product Attractiveness

  • Valeria D’Amato
  • Emilia Di Lorenzo
  • Albina Orlando
  • Marilena Sibillo
Chapter
Part of the The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis book series (PSDE, volume 46)

Abstract

Solvency assessing is a compelling issue for the insurance industry, also in light of the current international risk-based regulations. Internal models have to take into account risk/profit indicators, in order to provide flexible tools aimed at valuing solvency. We focus on a variable annuity with an embedded option involving a participation level which depends on the period financial result. We realize a performance evaluation by means of a suitable indicator, which properly captures both financial and demographic risk drivers. In fact, in the case of life annuity business, assessing solvency has to be framed within a wide time horizon, where specific financial and demographic risks are realized. In this order of ideas, solvency indicators have to capture the amount of capital to cope with the impact of those risk sources over the considered period. The analysis is carried out in accordance with a management perspective, apt to measure the business performance, which requires a correct risk control; in particular we present a study of the dynamics of the profit realized per unit of the total financial value of the contract. On the other hand, the consumer profitability is also measured by means of an utility-equivalent fixed life annuity. Ac-cording to the insureds point of view, we measure their perception of the contract profitability within the expected utility approach.

Keywords

Variable annuity Solvency/profit indexes Risk-adjusted management Consumer protection 

References

  1. Cocozza, R., De Simone, A., Di Lorenzo, E., & Sibillo, M. (2011, June 7–10). Participating policies: risk and value drivers in a financial management perspective. In Proceedings of the 14th Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis Conference, Rome, pp. 41–48. ISBN: 97888467-3045-9. http://www.asmda.eu/home.html
  2. Dacorogna, M. (2015, December). A change of paradigm for the insurance industry. SCOR Papers.Google Scholar
  3. D’Amato, V., Di Lorenzo, E., Orlando, A., Russolillo, M., & Sibillo, M. (2011). Profit participation annuities: A business liability analysis within a demographic risk sensitive approach. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 10(1), 155–165.Google Scholar
  4. Easton, A.E., & Harris J.F. (2007). Actuarial aspects of individual and annuity contracts (2nd ed.). Winsted: Actex Publication https://eiopa.europa.eu/consumer-protection
  5. EIOPA. (2016b). EIOPACP16/001, 1 February 2016. Consultation paper on EIOPAs advice on the development of an EU Single Market for personal pension products (PPP)). http://www.slideshare.net/EthosMedia/cp-16001-eiopa-personal-pensions
  6. EIOPA. (2016c). EIOPA-BoS-16-071, 6 April 2016. Final Report on public consultation on preparatory guidelines on product oversight governance arrangements by insurance undertakings and insurance distributors.Google Scholar
  7. Farrell, M., & Gallagher, R. (2015). The valuation implications of enterprise risk management maturity. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82(8), 625–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knoller, C. (2016). Multiple reference points and the demand for principal-protected life annuities: An experimental analysis. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1), 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maurer, R., Rogalla, R., & Siegelin, I. (2013). Participating payout life annuities. Lessons from Germany. ASTIN Bulletin, 43(02), 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Swiss Re. (2012). Understanding profitability in life insurance. http://www.swissre.com/media/news releases/nr 20120207measuring life pro tability.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valeria D’Amato
    • 1
  • Emilia Di Lorenzo
    • 2
  • Albina Orlando
    • 3
  • Marilena Sibillo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and StatisticsUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Economic and Statistical SciencesUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
  3. 3.National Research CouncilNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations