Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Business Legitimacy and Its Relationship with the Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis of Mexico and Spain Through the Case Method

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organizational Legitimacy

Abstract

The main objective of this research is to analyze the relationship between corporate social responsibility and social legitimacy. This is to fill the existing gap in the literature on legitimacy, in relation to the lack of empirical studies linking social responsibility with legitimacy. In order to analyze the relationships raised, we use an inductive methodology, for it will carry out a case study on the eight companies, three Mexican and five Spanish, included in the Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies for the period 2011–2012. The main finding that can be drawn is that it shows that there is a positive relationship between CSR and social legitimacy to business results. Also given the limited literature and research in Spanish companies, this study has demonstrated that Spanish companies also support these relationships, that is, both the social legitimacy as CSR can bring value to the results of the company. From a strategic point of view, managers might consider legitimacy within its strategic objectives. Managers must realize that not being able to manage legitimacy could involve the loss of it. It is no coincidence that companies with greater decreases of legitimacy are those with more internal and external problems. The main contribution of the study is to fill the gap in literature on legitimacy that relates to CSR as well as the lack of empirical studies in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G. (1999). Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2001). Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcantara, L., Mitsuhashi, H., & Hoshino, Y. (2006). Legitimacy in international joint ventures: It is still needed. Journal of International Management, 12(4), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L. (2007). Tarred and untarred by the same brush: Exploring interdependence in the volatility of stock returns. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, I., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2006). To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy-based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1559–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beelitz, A., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2011). Using discourse to restore organisational legitimacy: “Ceo-speak” after an incident in a german nuclear power plant. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, C. C., & Ostale, E. (2006). Lessons learned from unsuccessful internationalization attempts: Examples of multinational retailers in Chile. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 140–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J., Smithjr, C., & Zimmerman, J. (2002). Business ethics and organizational architecture. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(9), 1821–1835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brønn, P. S., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2008). Corporate motives for social initiative: Legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(S1), 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D. (1998). Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 35(1), 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Cotsakos, C. M., Griffith, D. A., & Hu, M. Y. (2006). The influence of liability of foreignness on market entry strategies: An illustration of market entry in China. International Marketing Review, 23(6), 636–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2005). Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. Journal of Management, 31(4), 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claasen, C., & Roloff, J. (2012). The link between responsibility and legitimacy: The case of de beers in namibia. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B., & Dean, T. (2005). Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: Top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Strategic Management Journal, 26(7), 683–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeds, D. L., Mang, P. Y., & Frandsen, M. L. (2004). The influence of firms’ and industries’ legitimacy on the flow of capital into high-technology ventures. Strategic Organization, 2(1), 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D., & Carter, S. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2010). Medición de la legitimidad organizativa: el caso de las Sociedades de Garantía Recíproca. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 43(junio), 115–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Román, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2013). Efecto del plazo de ejecución estratégica sobre la obtención de legitimidad organizativa. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedee.2013.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, M. (2006). Beyond the stalemate of economics versus ethics: Corporate social responsibility and the discourse of the organizational self. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escamilla, S., Plaza, P., & Flores, S. (2016). Análisis de la divulgación de la información sobre la responsabilidad social corporativa en las empresas de transporte público urbano en España. Revista de Contabilidad – Spanish Accounting Review, 19(2), 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J. (2005). The leadership challenge: Building resilient corporate reputations. In J. P. Doh & S. A. Stumpf (Eds.), Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business (pp. 54–68). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., Mithas, S., Morgeson, F. V., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). Customer satisfaction and stock prices: High returns, low risk. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halgin, D. S. (2006). The influence of legitimacy on career trajectories of individuals in leadership positions: NCAA basketball. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper 2006, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M., & Carroll, G. (1995). Organizational evolution in a multinational context: Entries of automobile manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy. American Sociological Review, 60(4), 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Carroll, G. (1992). In J. J. Boonstra (Ed.), Dynamics of organizational populations: Density, legitimation, and competition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14(3), 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M., & Gulati, R. (2006). Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W. (2005). Risk management, real options, corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P., & Smith, K. (1999). Contextualizing business ethics: Anomie and social life. Human Relations, 52(11), 1351–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard translating strategy in action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinrichert, D. (2008). Ethics, power and communities: Corporate social responsibility revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C.-S., Chiu, C.-J., Yang, C.-F., & Pai, D.-C. (2010). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti, L., & Lettieri, E. (2011). Gaining legitimacy in converging industries: Evidence from the emerging market of functional food. European Management Journal, 29(6), 462–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamertz, K., & Baum, J. A. C. (2009). The legitimacy of organizational downsizing in Canada: An analysis of explanatory media accounts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, E., Lin, T. M. Y., & Lin, B.-W. (2010). New high-tech venturing as process of resource accumulation. Management Decision, 48(8), 1230–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. A. Y. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield, S. (2008). Reconciling corporate citizenship and competitive strategy: Insights from economic theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcwilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Guest editors’ introduction corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(January), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbert, S. L. (2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: A conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 745–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngobo, P.-V., Casta, J.-F., & Ramond, O. (2011). Is customer satisfaction a relevant metric for financial analysts? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 480–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, P. R. (2005). In J. W. & Sons (Ed.), Balanced scorecard diagnostics: Maintaining maximum performance. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, J. M., Rutherford, M. W., & Nagy, B. G. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 915–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, T., & Rindova, V. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. The Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(February), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. S., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. (2008). The fruits of legitimacy: Why some new ventures gain more from innovation than others. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 58–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004). Return on marketing: Using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). A new venture’s cognitive legitimacy: An assessment by customers. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2), 148–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., Tucker, D., & House, R. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4), 52–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, J. A., & MacMillan, I. C. (1990). Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M., & Epstein, L. D. (2000). What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and ceo pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 523–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornikoski, E. T., & Newbert, S. L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. The Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, E. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, E. (2000). Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 591–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Contaduría y Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico

    Evaristo Galeana Figueroa & Dora Aguilasocho Montoya

  2. Department of Business Economics, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain

    Sandra Escamilla Solano & Paola Plaza Casado

Authors
  1. Evaristo Galeana Figueroa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandra Escamilla Solano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dora Aguilasocho Montoya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paola Plaza Casado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Escamilla Solano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain

    Emilio Díez-De-Castro

  2. Organizacion de Empresas Camino de Vera, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain

    Marta Peris-Ortiz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Figueroa, E.G., Solano, S.E., Montoya, D.A., Casado, P.P. (2018). The Business Legitimacy and Its Relationship with the Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis of Mexico and Spain Through the Case Method. In: Díez-De-Castro, E., Peris-Ortiz, M. (eds) Organizational Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75990-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation