Advertisement

Introduction

Chapter
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter discusses the very term and position of Eastern Europe within the official discourse in scholarship. While shedding light on the omissions in the readings of the cinema of the post-socialist era, it calls for the re-evaluation of the films of Eastern Europe from a spatial perspective. This chapter introduces the book’s two aesthetic categories—horizontal and vertical enclosure—and explains the reason for a comparative study from a socio-historical perspective.

Keywords

Eastern European Cinema Mazierska Hungarian Film Connotative Language Vertical Enclosure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andreescu, F. C. (2011). The changing face of the other in Romanian films. Nationalities Papers, 39(1), 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assman, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batori, A. (2015). Addressing the Russian other. Iluminace, 27(1), 95–99.Google Scholar
  4. Batt, J. (2013). Introduction: Defining Central and Eastern Europe. In S. White, G. L. Paul, & J. Batt (Eds.), Developments in Central & East European politics 5 (pp. 1–19). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Bíró, Y. (1990). Landscape after battle: Films from the other Europe. Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 199(1), 161–182.Google Scholar
  6. Crampton, R. J. (1997). Eastern Europe in the twentieth century—And after. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Deletant, D. (1995). Ceausescu and the securitate. In Coercion and dissent in Romania, 1965–1989. London: Hurst and Company Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Elsaesser, T. (2015). European cinema into the twenty-first century: Enlarging the context? In M. Harrod, M. Liz, & A. Timoshkina (Eds.), The Europeanness of European cinema: Identity, meaning, globalization (pp. 17–33). London/New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  9. Enyedi, G. (1996). Urbanization under socialism. In G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, & I. Szelényi (Eds.), Cities after socialism. Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies (pp. 110–118). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  11. Galt, R. (2006). The new European cinema. Redrawing the map. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gelencsér, G. (2002). A Titanic zenekara. Stílusok és irányzatok a hetvenes évek magyar filmművészetében [Film style and tendencies in the 1970s’ Hungarian cinema]. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar
  13. Gervai, A. (2004). A tanúk. Film-történelem [Witnesses. Film-history]. Budapest: Saxum Kiadó.Google Scholar
  14. Gervai, A. (2011). Fedőneve: szocializmus. Művészek, ügynökök, titkosszolgák [Hungarian spies in socialism]. Pécs: Jelenkor Kiadó.Google Scholar
  15. Gott, M., & Herzog, T. (2014). East, West and Centre. Reframing post-1989 European cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gough, R. (2006). A good comrade. János Kádár, communism and hungary. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  17. Györffy, M. (2001). A tizedik évtized. A Magyar játékfilm a kilencvenes években és más tanulmányok [Hungarian film in the 1990s]. Budapest: Palatinus Kiadó.Google Scholar
  18. György, P. (2000). Néma hagyomány. Budapest: Magvető Kiadó.Google Scholar
  19. Halbwachs, M. (1996). On collective memory. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, R. A. (1997). The dynamics of media independence in post-Ceaușescu Romania. In P. H. O’Neil (Ed.), Post-communism and the media in Eastern Europe (pp. 102–124). London: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Imre, A. (Ed.). (2005). East European cinemas. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Imre, A. (Ed.). (2012). A companion to East European cinemas. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Ionita, M. (2010). Niki and Dante: Aging and death in contemporary Romanian cinema. Film Criticism, 34(2–3), 37–50.Google Scholar
  24. Iordanova, D. (2001). Cinema of flames. Balkan film, culture and the media. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Iordanova, D. (2003). Cinema of ‘the other Europe’. The industry and artistry of East Central European film. London: Wallflower Press.Google Scholar
  26. Iordanova, D. (2013). The film festival reader. Films need festivals, festivals need films. St Andrews: St Andrews Film Studies.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, M., Johns, R., & Woods, M. (2004). An introduction to political geography. Space, place and politics. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Kalmár, G. (2017). Formations of masculinity in post-communist Hungarian cinema. Labyrinthian man. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kiss, C. G. (2013). Understanding Central Europe: Nations and stereotypes. Budapest: Nap Kiadó.Google Scholar
  30. Kligman, G. (1998). The politics of duplicity: Controlling reproduction in Ceausescu’s Romania. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press; Köln: Walther König.Google Scholar
  31. Kürti, L. (2002). Youth and the state in Hungary. Capitalism, communism and class. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  32. Light, D., & Young, C. (2015). Public space and the legacies of communism in Bucharest. In L. Stan & D. Vancea (Eds.), Post-communist Romania at twenty-five. Linking past, present and future. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  33. Lisiak, A. A. (2010). Urban cultures in (post)colonial Central Europe. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mazierska, E. (2007). Post-communist Polish cinema. From pavement level. Bern: Peter Lang AG.Google Scholar
  35. Mazierska, E. (2014). Squeezing space, releasing space: Spatial research in the study of Eastern European cinema. In S. Bahun & J. Haynes (Eds.), Cinema, state socialism and society in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, 1917–1989 (pp. 9–24). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Mazierska, E., Kristensen, L., & Näripea, E. (2014). Postcolonial approaches to Eastern European cinema. Portraying neighbours on-screen. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  37. Mitchell, D. (2003). Cultural landscapes: Just lanscapes or landscapes of justice? Progress in Human Geography, 27(6), 787–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moore, D. C. (2001). Is the post- and postcolonial the post- and post-soviet? Toward a global postcolonial critique. PMLA, 116(1), 111–128.Google Scholar
  39. Murai, A. (2008). Film és kollektív emlékezet. Magyar múltfilmek a rendszerváltozás után [Film and collective memory. Hungarian past films made after the system change]. Szombathely: Savaria University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Neampu, M. (2010). History of communism in Europe. Bucharest: Zeta Books.Google Scholar
  41. O’Neill, B. (2009). The political agency of cityscapes: Spatializing governance in Ceausescu’s Bucharest. Journal of Social Archaeology, 9(1), 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Outhwaite, W., & Ray, L. (2005). Social theory and postcommunism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pacepa, I. (1987). Red horizons. The true story of Nicolae and Elena Ceausescus; Crimes, lifestyle and corruption. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.Google Scholar
  44. Petcu, C. (1999). Totalitarian city. Bucharest 1980–1989, semi-clinical files. In N. Leach (Ed.), Architecture and revolution. Contemporary perspectives on Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 177–187). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Piotrowski, P. (2012). Art and democracy in post-communist Europe (trans: Bryski, A.). London: Reaction Books.Google Scholar
  46. Priestland, D. (2009). The red flag: A history of communism. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rainer, M. J. (2007). The agent. Fragments on the state security and middle class values in Kádárist Hungary, Trondheim studies on East European cultures & societies no. 22. Budapest: 1956 Institute.Google Scholar
  48. Rosen, P. (2008). History, textuality, nation: Kracauer, Burch and some problems in the study of national cinemas. In V. Vitali & P. Willemen (Eds.), Theorising national cinema (pp. 1–17). London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  49. Scurtu, I. (2009). The Romanian revolution of December 1989 in international context. Bucharest: Editura Redactiei Publicatiilor Pentru.Google Scholar
  50. Skrodzka, A. (2012). Magic realist cinema in East Central Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Tabajdi, G. (2013). A III/III krónikája [The chronicle of III/III]. Budapest: Jaffa.Google Scholar
  52. Takács, T. (2013). Besúgók a besúgásról. Ügynök-visszaemlékezések a Kádár-korszakból [Informers on informing. Informer-memories from the Kádár-era]. Budapest: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  53. Tismăneanu, V. (1991). The revival of politics in Romania. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 38(1), 85–99, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tismăneanu, V. (2010). Coming to terms with a traumatic past: Reflections on democracy, atonement, and memory. In M. Neamtu, C. Dobos, & M. Stan (Eds.), History of communism in Europe (Issue 1, pp. 15–20). Bucharest: Zeta Books.Google Scholar
  55. Todorova, M. (2014). Introduction: Similar trajectories, different memories. In M. Todorova, A. Dimou, & S. Troebst (Eds.), Remembering communism. Private and public recollections of lived experience in Southeast Europe (pp. 1–29). Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Verdery, K. (1996). What was socialism and what comes next? Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zukin, S. (1991). Landscapes of power: From Detroit to Disneyworld. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Babeș-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations