Advertisement

Contextual Influences on Girls’ and Boys’ Motivation and Reading Achievement: Family, Schoolmates, and Country

  • Ming Ming ChiuEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 15)

Abstract

Girls outperform boys in reading, in part, due to differences in motivation and context effects (of family, schoolmates, and country). Compared to boys, girls tend to have more positive attitudes toward reading, enjoy it more, value it more, read more often and view themselves as competent in reading. Also, richer families buy more educational resources for boys than for girls, but girls engage in more family communication; both distinctions yield corresponding differences in motivation and reading achievement. Furthermore, girls typically participate in peer cultures at school with more female schoolmates who show greater reading motivation, more reading, and more discussion of books compared to other peer cultures with more male schoolmates; as a result, students in peer groups with more girls often have higher reading achievement. Also, richer countries offer more publicly available educational resources (public schools, museums, etc.) than poorer countries, so these resources substitute for educational resources at home, reduce their gender disparity at home, and raise girls’ reading advantage over boys. In countries with greater economic equality, students show higher overall reading achievement, and girls especially benefit from the parity in resources, which increases their reading gap with boys. Lastly, masculine cultures with rigid gender roles often discourage girls’ ambitions for high status, masculine jobs, which reduces their extrinsic reading motivation and reading achievement, compared to girls in other cultures.

Keywords

Family Schoolmates Economy Cultural values Reading 

References

  1. Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452–477.  https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., & Letendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the “Heyneman-Loxley effect” on mathematics and science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46(3), 291–312.Google Scholar
  3. Blackburn, M. V. (2003). Boys and literacies: What difference does gender make? Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 276–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., & Britto, P. R. (1999). Are socioeconomic gradients for children similar to those for adults? Achievement and health of children in the United States. In D. P. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Developmental health and the wealth of nations (pp. 94–124). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chiu, M. M. (2010). Inequality, family, school, and mathematics achievement. Social Forces, 88(4), 1645–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiu, M. M. (2008a). Flowing toward correct contributions during groups’ mathematics problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 415–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiu, M. M. (2008b). China’s changing economy, families, cultural values, and student learning: Benefits, challenges, and strategies. In F. Columbus’s (Ed.), Education in China: 21st century issues and challenges (pp. 141–156). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Chiu, M. M. (2013a). Family structure and education. In J. Ainsworth & G. J. Golson’s (Eds.), Sociology of education (pp. 271–275). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Chiu, M. M. (2013b). Parental involvement. In J. Ainsworth & G. J. Golson’s (Eds.), Sociology of education (pp. 570–572). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Chiu, M. M. (2015). Family inequality, school inequalities and mathematics achievement in 65 countries: Microeconomic mechanisms of rent seeking and diminishing marginal returns. Teachers College Record, 117(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
  12. Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B. W.-Y. (2010). Culture, motivation, and reading achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B. W.-Y. (2011). Classroom discipline across 41 countries: School, economic, and cultural differences. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(3), 516–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B. W.-Y. (2015a). International comparisons of student achievement. In S. Rosa’s (Ed.), Progress in Education (Vol. 32, pp. 93–108). Hauppauge: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  15. Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B. W.-Y. (2015b). Classmate characteristics and student achievement in 33 countries: Classmates’ past achievement, family SES, educational resources and attitudes toward reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiu, M. M., & Joh, S. W. (2015). Cross-national comparisons in education-PISA. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 5, 2nd ed., pp. 342–348). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2003). Rudeness and status effects during group problem solving: Do they bias evaluations and reduce the likelihood of correct solutions? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 506–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2005). Effects of resources, inequality, and privilege bias on achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 575–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chiu, M. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2009). Calibration of reading self-concept and reading achievement among 15-year- olds: Cultural differences in 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 372–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chiu, M. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chiu, M. M., Chow, B. W.-Y., & McBride-Chang, C. (2007). Universals and specifics in learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 344–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chiu, M. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010). Family and reading in 41 countries: Differences across cultures and students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 514–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chiu, M. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Lin, D. (2012). Ecological, psychological, and cognitive components of reading difficulties: Testing the component model of reading in fourth graders across 38 countries. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. D’Ailly, H. (2003). Children’s autonomy and perceived control in learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  27. Downey, D. B. (2001). Number of siblings and intellectual development. American Psychologist, 56(6/7), 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1982). Influences on academic achievement across high and low income countries. Sociology of Education, 55(1), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W.-O., Lee, S.-H., Tsang, S.-M., & Luan, V. H. (2003). Cognitive profiling and preliminary subtyping in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 91, 43–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Johnson, R., & Johnson, P. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lareau, A. (2001). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  34. Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma, X., & Willms, J. D. (2004). School disciplinary climate: Characteristics and effects on eight grade achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 169–188.Google Scholar
  36. McBride-Chang, C. (2004). Children’s literacy development. London: Arnold/Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Murphey, T. (1994). Tests: Learning through negotiated interaction. TESOL Journal Guidelines for Contributors, 4(2), 12.Google Scholar
  38. Muter, V. (2003). Early reading development and dyslexia. London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Ogbu, J. (2007). African American education: A cultural-ecological perspective. In H. P. McAdoo (Ed.), Black families (pp. 79–94). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pan, B. A., Perlmann, R. Y., & Snow, C. E. (2000). Food for thought. In L. Menn & N. B. Ratner (Eds.), Methods for studying language production (pp. 205–224). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Parcel, T. L., & Dufur, M. J. (2001). Capital at home and at school: Effects on student achievement. Social forces, 79(3), 881–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education. Englewood Cliffs: Merrill.Google Scholar
  43. Powell, B., & Steelman, L. C. (1993). The educational benefits of being spaced out. American Sociological Review, 58, 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson, K. H. (1992). Classroom discipline: Power, resistance and gender. A look at teacher perspectives. Gender & Education, 4, 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sandberg, J. F., & Hofferth, S. L. (2001). Changes in children’s time with parents: United States, 1981–1997. Demography, 38, 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Skibbe, L. E., Phillips, B. M., Day, S. L., Brophy-Herb, H. E., & Connor, C. M. (2012). Children’s early literacy growth in relation to classmates’ self-regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 541–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, M. W., & Wilhelm, J. D. (2002). Reading don’t fix no Chevy: Literacy in the lives of young men. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  49. United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF]. (2011). The state of the world’s children 2001. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/sowc11/
  50. Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wagemaker, H., Taube, K., Munck, I., Kontogiannopoulou-Polydorides, G., & Martin, M. (1996). Are girls better readers? Amsterdam: IEA.Google Scholar
  52. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Expectancy value theory in cross-cultural perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 165–198). Charlotte: IAP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Special Education and CounsellingFaculty of Education and Human Development, The Education University of Hong KongTing KokHong Kong

Personalised recommendations