Skip to main content

Consortia and Collaboration in Environmental Sciences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 635 Accesses

Abstract

Consortia are a voluntary partnership that builds knowledge and community. The idea of consortia originated from Japan and British business models. Changes in the laws in the USA in the 1980s allowed for business consortia to form in the USA. Academic consortia often use shared resources to work on large projects or solve big problems. Best practices are (1) defining metrics of success and failure in the planning stages, (2) bringing the best scientists to the group and trusting them to participate and communicate, (3) sharing data and discussing ownership and authorship often, and (4) creating policies that reduce the impact of Rogue Researchers and Rogue Writers. Inclusivity should be intentional from the outset of the consortium and revisited periodically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich HE, Sasaki T (1995) R&D consortia in the United State and Japan. Res Policy 24:301–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baus F, Ramsbottom CA (1999) Starting and sustaining a consortium. In: Dotolo LG, Strandness JT (eds) Best practices in higher education consortia: how institutions can work together, New directions for higher education, no. 106 vol XXVII. Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco, p 125

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransetetter LG, Sakakibara M (2002) When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. Am Econ Rev 92:143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daley S, Wingard DL, Reznik V (2006) Improving the retention of underrepresented minority faculty in academic medicine. J Natl Med Assoc 98:1434–1440

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotolo LG, Strándness JT (1999) Best practices in higher education consortia: how institutions can work together: new directions for higher education, number 106. Wiley, Hoboken, p 125

    Google Scholar 

  • Green SM, Hart G, Wagner EH (2005) Measuring and improving performance in multicenter research consortia. JNCI Monogr 35:26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan JB, Soranno PA, Angilletta MJ Jr, Buckley LB, Gruner DS, Keitt TH, Kellner JR, Kominoski JS, Rocha AV, Xiao J, Harms TK, Goring SJ, Koenig LE, McDowell WH, Powell H, Richardson AD, Stow CA, Vargas R, Weathers KC (2014) Macrosystems ecology: understanding patterns and processes at continental scales. Front Ecol Environ 12:5–14. https://doi.org/10.1890/120017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffner A (1981) Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines. Scientometrics 3:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02021860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz ML (1986) An analysis of cooperative research and development. RAND J Econ 17:527–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeen S (2016) Best practices for a successful consortium. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/5-best-practices-successful-consortium-shannon-mckeen. Last accessed 18 Aug 2017

  • Moore JC (2005) The Sloan Consortium quality framework and the five pillars. http://www.mit.jyu.fi/OPE/kurssit/TIES462/Materiaalit/Sloan.pdf . Last accessed 23 Aug 2017

  • Peterson LM (1999) Consortial fundraising. In: Dotolo LG, Strandness JT (eds) Best practices in higher education consortia: how institutions can work together, New directions for higher education, no. 106 vol XXVII. Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco, p 125

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Cigliano JA, Parsons C (2014) Three scientific authors share their experiences and solutions and ask you for yours (with a sample agreement for co-authors). Biological Conservation. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/co-authors-gone-bad-how-to-avoid-publishing-conflicts

  • Wang G, Kurose J (2016) IUCRC clusters for grand challenges, a collaborative opportunity for research to address grand challenges. NSF 17-035. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2017/nsf17035/nsf17035.jsp. Last accessed 28 Aug 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda M. Hooper-Bùi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hooper-Bùi, L.M., Matherne, B., Washburn, G. (2018). Consortia and Collaboration in Environmental Sciences. In: Burggren, W., Dubansky, B. (eds) Development and Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75935-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics