The Anthropocene—What Does It Entail for Science?

  • Gesche Krause
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences book series (BRIEFSEARTHSYST)


Science permeates almost every aspect of modern life, sometimes in obvious and sometimes less obvious ways. Societies largely trust and expect science to inform debate, advance the standard of living and solve problems as they emerge. The Paris Climate Agreement (UN 2016) is an epitome of this Zeitgeist as policy makers, distinguished members acting as an extension of society, demonstrated their trust in the consensus of the scientific community and shaped future policies to tackle the predicted effects of climate change accordingly.


  1. Amel, E., Manning, C., Scott, B., & Koger, S. (2017). Beyond the roots of human inaction: Fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science, 356, 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glaeser, B., Bruckmeier, K., Glaser, M., & Krause, G. (2009). Social-ecological systems analysis in coastal and marine areas: A path toward integration of interdisciplinary knowledge. Current Trends in Human Ecology, 21(1), 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Görg, C. (2016). From daily business to earth history. The varying time scales of the anthropocene debate. GAIA, 25(1), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamilton, C., Gemenne, F., & Bonneuil, C. (2015). The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. HGF. (2016). Wissenstransfer in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft-Konzept zur strategischen Weiterentwicklung und Stärkung. 19 pp. Retrieved September 21, 2017, from
  8. HGF. (2017). Mission Statement of the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres. Retrieved September 21, 2017, from
  9. Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IGBP (International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme). (2015). Planetary dashboard shows Great Acceleration in human activity since 1950. Press release, January 15. Retrieved August 24, 2017, from
  11. Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C. Corell, R., Hall, M., Jaeger, C. et al. (2001): Sustainability science. Research and assessment systems for sustainability program. Discussion Paper 2000–2033. Cambridge, MA: Environment and Natural Resources Program, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  12. Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., et al. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F. et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461: 472–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. UN (United Nations). (2015). 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved October 23, 2017, from
  15. UN (United Nations). (2016). Paris Climate Agreement. Retrieved October 23, 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earth System Knowledge Platform (ESKP), Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine ScienceBremerhavenGermany

Personalised recommendations