Abstract
Research in superheavy elements (SHEs) is not only a highly specialized branch of modern science its history also casts light on problems of a more general nature. One of these problems, a classical one in the history of science, is the uneasy relationship between physics and chemistry in transdisciplinary research. Another problem of a philosophical nature relates to the very meaning of the concept of discovery. The transuranic elements are not discovered in nature, but created or manufactured in the laboratory. What does it imply, more precisely, to assign priority to a certain collaboration for having discovered—or created—a new element? Lastly, one may question if all officially recognised superheavy elements exist in the sense ordinarily associated with the term existence. After all, they have very short lifetimes and disappear almost instantly after having been created. Even though nuclides of the heaviest elements have undoubtedly been identified, it does not follow that they can rightfully be classified as chemical elements on par with ordinary elements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achinstein, P.: Who really discovered the electron? In: Buchwald, J., Warwick, A. (eds.) Histories of the Electron: The Birth of Microphysics, 403–424. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
Amoretti, M., et al.: Production and detection of cold antihydrogen atoms. Nature 419, 456–459 (2002)
Armbruster, P., Münzenberg, G.: Creating superheavy elements. Sci. Am. 144, 66–72 (1989) (May)
Barber, R.C., et al.: Discovery of the element with atomic number 112. Pure Appl. Chem. 81, 1331–1343 (2009)
Benfey, O.T.: ’The great chain of being’ and the periodic table of the elements. J. Chem. Educ. 42, 39–41 (1965)
Brannigan, A.: The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)
Close, F.: Antimatter. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)
Flerov, G.N., et al.: History of the transfermium elements Z = 101, 102, 103. Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 22, 453–483 (1991)
Gilead, A.: Eka-elements as chemical pure possibilities. Found. Chem. 18, 183–194 (2016)
Goldanski, V.I.: The periodic system of D. I. Mendeleev and problems of nuclear chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 47, 406–417 (1970)
ICCE: International atomic weights 1925. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 47, 597–601 (1925)
Jarlskog, C.: Lord Rutherford of Nelson, his 1908 Nobel Prize in chemistry, and why he didn’t get a second prize. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 136, 012001 (2008)
Jarlskog, C.: Validation of new superheavy elements and IUPAC-IUPAP joint working group. EPJ Web Conf. 131, 06004 (2016)
Johnson, G.: At Lawrence Berkeley, physicists say a colleague took them for a ride. New York Times, 15 Oct D1 (2002)
Karol, P.J., et al.: Discovery of the elements with atomic numbers Z = 113, 115 and 117. Pure Appl. Chem. 88, 139–153 (2016)
Koppenol, W.H., et al.: Names for muonium and hydrogen atoms and their ions. Pure Appl. Chem. 73, 377–380 (2001)
Kragh, H.: Anatomy of a priority conflict: The case of element 72. Centaurus 23, 275–301 (1980)
Kragh, H.: From ‘electrum’ to positronium. J. Chem. Educ. 67, 196–197 (1990)
Kragh, H.: The solar element: a reconsideration of helium’s early history. An. Sci. 66, 157–182 (2009)
Kragh, H.: To be or not to be: the early history of H3 and H3 +. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 5225–5235 (2012)
Kragh, H.: On the ontology of superheavy elements. Substantia 1, 7–17 (2017)
Kratz, J.V.: Chemistry of transactinides. In: Vértes, A., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Nuclear Chemistry, pp. 925–1004. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Kuhn, T.: Historical structure of scientific discovery. Science 136, 760–764 (1962)
Le Poidevin, R.: Missing elements and missing premises: a combinatorial argument for the ontological reduction of chemistry. Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 56, 117–134 (2005)
Maglich, B. (ed.): Adventures in Experimental Physics, vol. 2. Princeton, World Science Education (1972)
Mitcham, C.: Thinking Through Technology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)
Olby, R.C.: Rediscovery as an historical concept. In: Visser, R., et al. (eds.) New Trends in the History of Science, pp. 197–208. Ropodi, Amsterdam (1989)
Ramsay, W.: The electron as an element. J. Chem. Soc. 93, 774–788 (1908)
Rydberg, J.R.: Elektron der erste Grundstoff. Håkon Ohlsson, Lund (1906)
Schädel, M.: Chemistry of the superheavy elements. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140191 (2015)
Schickore, J.: Scientific discovery. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-discovery/#Dis (2014)
Susskind, L.: The Cosmic Landscape. Little, Brown and Co., New York (2006)
Türler, A., Pershina, V.: Advances in the production and chemistry of the heaviest elements. Chem. Rev. 113, 1237–1312 (2013)
Wapstra, A.H., et al.: Criteria that must be satisfied for the discovery of a new chemical element to be recognized. Pure Appl. Chem. 63, 879–886 (1991)
Wilkinson, D.H., et al.: Discovery of the transfermium elements. Pure Appl. Chem. 67, 1757–1814 (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kragh, H. (2018). Some Philosophical Issues. In: From Transuranic to Superheavy Elements. SpringerBriefs in History of Science and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75813-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75813-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75812-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75813-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)