Abstract
The Democratic Forum approach makes a major contribution to understanding what people want from the welfare state and what they think is possible and to the framings that connect their ideas. Our work shows how intergenerational solidarity and support for the core welfare state services (healthcare and pensions) remain resilient across Europe, while views on inequality and, most importantly, on immigration differ between countries. Despite conflict, the dominant view across most of Europe is that immigration tensions can be managed through social and cultural integration. In the UK the primary stance is exclusionary and chauvinist.
In other policy areas the emphasis in popular ideas is shifting from old to young. The most striking finding is the strength with which social investment policies involving childcare, training, education and support into work are endorsed, for different reasons, in all five countries. Older people, especially in richer countries, are willing to make sacrifices to help their children’s generation.
Trust in government plays a strong role in welfare state attitudes, and the UK also stands out in the lack of public confidence in the capacity of its government to sustain decent services.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andreß, H.-J., & Heien, T. (2001). Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 17(4), 337–356.
Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2001). Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter? Acta Sociologica, 44(4), 283–299.
Blekesaune, M., & Quadagno, J. (2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies a comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 415–427.
Dahlberg, S., Linde, J., & Holmberg, S. (2014). Democratic discontent in old and new democracies: Assessing the importance of democratic input and governmental output. Political Studies, 63(1), 18–37.
European Commission. (2010). Towards a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM (2010) 2020. Retrieved November 27, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf.
European Commission. (2013). Towards social investment for growth and cohesion-including implementing the European Social Fund 2014–2020. COM (2013) 83 final. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2014). Third Public Health Initiative. Retrieved November 27, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/programme/docs/factsheet_healthprogramme2014_2020_en.pdf.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of post-industrial welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
European Social Survey (ESS). (2017). ESS Round 8. Retrieved November 21, 2017, from http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/.
Eurostat. (2017). Inequality of income distribution. Retrieved November 17, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tsdsc260&plugin=1.
Jennings, W., Clarke, N., Moss, J., & Stoker, G. (2017). The decline in diffuse support for national politics: The long view on political discontent in Britain’. Political Quarterly, 81(3), 748–758.
Kolarič, Z., Kopač, A., & Rakar, T. (2011). Welfare states in transition: The development of the welfare system in Slovenia. In S. Dehnert & M. Stambolieva (Eds.), Welfare states in transition: 20 years after the Yugoslav welfare model (pp. 288–309). Sofia: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
Leruth, B. (2017). The Europeanisation of the welfare state: The case for a differentiated European social model. In P. Taylor-Gooby, B. Leruth, & H. Chung (Eds.), After austerity: Welfare state transformation in Europe after the great recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Likki, T., & Staerklé, C. (2015). Welfare support in Europe: Interplay of dependency culture beliefs and meritocratic contexts. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27(1), 138–153.
Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roosma, F., Gelissen, J., & van Oorschot, W. (2013). The multidimensionality of welfare state attitudes: A European cross-national study. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 235–255.
Scruggs, L. (2007). Welfare state generosity across space and time. In J. Clasen & N. A. Siegel (Eds.), Investigating welfare state change. The ‘dependent variable problem’ in comparative analysis (pp. 133–165). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Svallfors, S. (2012). Contested welfare states: Welfare attitudes in Europe and beyond. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Taylor-Gooby, P., Leruth, B., & Chung, H. (Eds.). (2017). After austerity: The new politics of welfare in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Oorschot, W., Roosma, F., Meuleman, B., & Reeskens, T. (Eds.). (2017). The social legitimacy of targeted welfare. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor-Gooby, P., Leruth, B. (2018). Democratic Forums and Welfare State Attitudes. In: Taylor-Gooby, P., Leruth, B. (eds) Attitudes, Aspirations and Welfare. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75783-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75783-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75782-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75783-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)