Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individualism and Neo-Liberalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Attitudes, Aspirations and Welfare

Abstract

Neo-liberal ideas exert increasing influence on welfare state policies in Europe. Neo-liberalism values individual interaction in free markets. It argues for welfare state cutbacks and greater individual responsibility and stresses the importance of opportunity. This in turn underscores particular themes in public attitudes (deservingness, obligation and choice) and downplays others (solidarity and community).

This chapter reviews the background theoretical, policy and public attitude literature, analyses the findings of our Democratic Forums and shows how they contribute to understanding popular framings of individualism. We identify two dominant framings in different countries. One puts the emphasis on individual responsibility. It is most prominent in the denigration of unemployed people as workshy, notably in the UK and to some extent Germany, but conflicts with the widespread positive valuing of collective healthcare, pensions and education. The second more positive approach, found in all five countries, supports state investment in training, childcare and other services to mobilise workers and expand the range of opportunities to which people may aspire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen, J. G. (1999). Changing labour markets, new social divisions and welfare state support: Denmark in the 1990s. In S. Svallfors & P. Taylor-Gooby (Eds.), The end of the welfare state? Responses to state retrenchment (pp. 13–33). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2001). Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter? Acta Sociologica, 44(4), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blekesaune, M., & Quadagno, J. (2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolzendahl, C., & Olafsdottir, S. (2008). Gender group interest or gender ideology? Sociological Perspectives, 51(2), 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G. (2000). Public attitudes to social protection and political economy traditions in Western Europe. European Societies, 2(4), 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, C., Martin, R., Mau, S., & Taylor-Gooby, P. (2011). Differing notions of social welfare? In J. Clasen (Ed.), Converging worlds of welfare? (pp. 15–32). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M., Garritzmann, J., Neimanns, E., & Nezi, R. (2017). Investing in education in Europe: Evidence from a new survey of public opinion. Journal of European Social Policy, 27(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717700562.

  • Cantillon, B. (2011). The paradox of the social investment state. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 432–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carriero, R. (2016). More inequality, fewer class differences. Comparative Sociology, 15(1), 112–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission 2011 Linked to European Commission. (2011). EU Economic governance “Six-Pack” enters into force, Memo 11/898. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-11-898_en.htm.

  • EC. (2013). Towards social investment for growth and cohesion-including implementing the European Social Fund 2014–2020. COM (2013) 83 final. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2015). Results of the public consultation on the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Com 2015 100. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/europe2020_consultation_results_en.pdf.

  • Edlund, J. (1999). Progressive taxation farewell? In S. Svallfors & P. Taylor-Gooby (Eds.), The end of the welfare state? Responses to retrenchment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervasti, H., Andersen, J. G., Fridberg, T., & Ringdal, K. (2012). The future of the welfare state. Cheltenhem: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., Mariah, R., Kelley, J., & Breznau, N. (2014). The welfare state and attitudes towards inequality and redistribution. Paper presented at the ASA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (1993). EC citizens and social protection. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, C. (2001). Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 82(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I. (2011). From financial crisis to fiscal crisis. In K. Farnsworth & Z. Irving (Eds.), Social policy in challenging times. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J., & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-take-all politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakhverdian, A., Van Elsas, E., Van Der Brug, W., & Kuhn, T. (2013). Euroscepticism and education. European Union Politics, 14(4), 522–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. (1997). The dream of the Mount Pelerin Society. The Independent Review, 1(4), 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. (2016). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2017). World economic outlook database, October 2016. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/01/weodata/index.aspx.

  • Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaase, M., & Newton, K. (1995). Beliefs in government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesi, J., Brähler, E., Schmutzer, G., & Decker, O. (2016). Euroscepticism and right-wing extremist attitudes in Germany. German Politics, online. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2016.1226810.

  • Knijn, T., & Komter, A. E. (2004). Solidarity between the sexes and the generations: Transformations in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knijn, T., & Van Oorschot, W. (2008). The need for and the societal legitimacy of social investments in children and their families. Journal of Family Issues, 29(11), 1520–1542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Hoglinger, D., Hutter, S., & Wuest, B. (2012). Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, C. A. (2008). The political logic of labour market reforms and popular images of target groups. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(1), 50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linos, K., & West, M. (2003). Self-interest, social beliefs, and attitudes to redistribution. European Sociological Review, 19(4), 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likki, T., & Staerklé, C. (2014). Welfare support in Europe: Interplay of dependency culture beliefs and meritocratic contexts. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27(1), 138–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mau, S. (2003). The moral economy of welfare states: Britain and Germany compared. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier Jæger, M. (2006). What makes people support public responsibility for welfare provision? Acta Sociologica, 49(3), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuleman, B., & Chung, H. (2012). Who should care for the children? In H. Ervasti, J. G. Andersen, T. Fridberg, & K. Ringdal (Eds.), The future of the welfare state (pp. 107–133). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mewes, J., & Mau, S. (2012). Unraveling working-class welfare chauvinism. In S. Svallfors (Ed.), Contested welfare states: Welfare attitudes in Europe and beyond (pp. 119–157). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, B. (2013). What use is ‘social investment’? Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Fiscal consolidation: Targets, plans and measures. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-11-5kg869h4w5f6.

  • Pederson, J. (2014). Where should the money go? International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (Ed.). (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, F. (2015). Neoliberalism and the welfare state. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 31(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2014.1001665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roosma, F. (2016). A multidimensional perspective on the social legitimacy of welfare states in Europe. Tilburg: Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosma, F., Gelissen, J., & van Oorschot, W. (2013). The multidimensionality of welfare state attitudes: A European cross-national study. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(3), 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, S., Birch, K., & MacLeavy, J. (Eds.). (2016). The handbook of neoliberalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staerklé, C., Likki, T., & Scheidegger, R. (2012). A normative approach to welfare attitudes. In S. Svallfors (Ed.), Contested welfare states: Welfare attitudes in Europe and beyond (Vol. 81). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2016). The Euro and its threat to the future of Europe. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svallfors, S. (1997). Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution. European Sociological Review, 13(3), 283–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P. (1982). Two cheers for the welfare state. Journal of Public Policy, 2(4), 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P. (2002). The silver age of the welfare state. Journal of Social Policy, 31(4), 597–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P., & Martin, R. (2010). Fairness, equality and legitimacy. Social Policy & Administration, 44(1), 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P., Leruth, B., & Chung, H. (Eds.). (2017). After austerity: Welfare state transformation in Europe after the great recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, C. G. (2002). Reciprocity, justice and statutory health insurance in Germany. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Waal, J., Achterberg, P., Houtman, D., De Koster, W., & Manevska, K. (2010). ‘Some are more equal than others’: Economic egalitarianism and welfare chauvinism in the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(4), 350–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oorschott, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroucke, F., Hemerijck, A., & Palier, B. (2011). The EU needs a social investment pact. OSE Paper Series, Opinion paper 5. Observatoire Social Europeene, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hayek, F. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

    Peter Taylor-Gooby

  2. Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Benjamin Leruth

Authors
  1. Peter Taylor-Gooby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin Leruth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Taylor-Gooby .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom

    Peter Taylor-Gooby

  2. Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Benjamin Leruth

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Taylor-Gooby, P., Leruth, B. (2018). Individualism and Neo-Liberalism. In: Taylor-Gooby, P., Leruth, B. (eds) Attitudes, Aspirations and Welfare. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75783-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75783-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75782-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75783-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation