The Links Between Smart Specialisation Strategy, the Quintuple Helix Model and Living Labs

  • Vincenzo Provenzano
  • Massimo Arnone
  • Maria Rosaria Seminara
Conference paper
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

This paper analyzes how the Living Labs can be designed as tools for a more effective implementation of the Smart Specialisation Strategy (S3) within the Quintuple Helix Model. Above all, the Quintuple Helix espouses the formation of a constructive situation encompassing ecology, knowledge and innovation, and creating extensive synergy between economy, society, and democracy. In this paper, we shall be focusing on the Quintuple Helix and Living Labs geared towards creating a shared arena in which services, processes and new ways of working via technology can be developed and tested with user representatives and researchers. Since the Living Lab is a rather new research area, the number of supporting theories for understanding the concept is limited. The same is true when it comes to methodologies, methods and tools. The aim of the paper is to clarify these perspectives and to illustrate how they can enhance each other.

Keywords

Smart specialisation strategy Living labs Quintuple helix model 

References

  1. Baccarne, B., Logghe, S., Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. (2016). Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(3), 22–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barca, F. (2009). An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. In Independent report prepared at the request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy. Danuta Hübner. European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  3. Bergavall-Kareborn, B., Stahlbrost, A., Eriksson, C. I., & Svensson J. (2009). A Milieu for InnovationDefining Living Labs. 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium, New York City, USA, 6–9 December.Google Scholar
  4. Boccella, N., & Salerno, I. (2015). Beni pubblici e sviluppo urbano. Il progetto “Smart Cities Living Lab”, Labor Est. n. 10. Available at http://pkp.unirc.it/ojs/index.php/LaborEst/article/view/187.
  5. Capello, R. (2014). Smart specialisation strategy and the new EU Cohesion Policy reform: Introductory remarks. Scienze Regionali, 13(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). Mode 3 and Quadruple Helix: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesbrough, H. W., & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. David, P., Foray, D., & Hall, B. H. (2009). Measuring Smart Specialisation: The Concept and the Need for Indicators. Knowledge for Growth Expert Group. Available at http://cemi.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/cemi/files/users/178044/public/Measuring%20smart%20specialisation.doc.
  11. EC—Commission of the European Communities. (2010). Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe. Brussels: COM(2010)553.Google Scholar
  12. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  13. Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart Specialisation—The Concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief n° 9. European Commission.Google Scholar
  14. Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2011). Smart specialization from academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. MTEI Working Paper.Google Scholar
  15. Foray, D., Goddard, J., Beldarrain, X. G., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., et al. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS 3). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  16. Iacobucci, D., & Guzzini, E. (2016). Relatedness and connectivity in technological domains: missing links in S3 design and implementation. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1511–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bevilacqua C., & Pizzimenti, P. (2016). Living Lab and Cities as Smart Specialisation Strategies Engine. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 915–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IBM’s Smarter Cities Challenge. (2012). Siracusa Summary Report. Retrieved from https://www.smartercitieschallenge.org/cities?page=8#cities.
  19. McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013) Modern Regional Innovation Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S., Eriksson, M., & Hribernik, K. A. (2006). State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. In The 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks, ICE 2006, Milan, Italy, June 26–28, pp. 349–357.Google Scholar
  22. Provenzano V., Arnone M., & Seminara M. R. (2016). Innovation in the rural areas and the linkage with the Quintuple Helix Model. Proceedings—Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 442–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rota, F. S. (2014). Opportunità e limiti delle strategie di social innovation. Il caso dei living labs, in (a cura di) Mazzola F., Musolino D., Provenzano V. Reti, nuovi settori e sostenibilità. Prospettive per l’analisi e le politiche regionali. Franco Angeli, Milano.Google Scholar
  24. Santoro, R., & Conte, M. (2009). Living Labs in Open Innovation Functional Regions. White paper. Retrieved from March 10, 2010. http://www.ami-communities.eu/wiki/AMI%40Work_on-line_Communities.
  25. Shami, T. A. (2008). Living Labs: Good Practices in Europe. In Schumacher J. & Niitamo V. P. (Eds.), European Living Labs: A New Approach for Human Centric Regional Innovation (pp. 15–30). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag: Berlin.Google Scholar
  26. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincenzo Provenzano
    • 1
  • Massimo Arnone
    • 1
  • Maria Rosaria Seminara
    • 1
  1. 1.SEAS, University of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations