Advertisement

You Press the Button, We Do the Rest. Personal Archiving in Capture Culture

  • Jacek Smolicki
Chapter

Abstract

In today’s abundance of media technological devices we engage in capturing ever more detailed aspects of everyday lives. Due to the constant state of connectivity with human and non-human actors of the network society, the boundaries between voluntary and involuntary capture and archiving become ever more blurred. In the context of ubiquitous technologies we have become at once micro-archivists and micro-archives, or, differently put, subjects and objects of pervasively radiating micro-temporal of the arts in relation to Bernard of capture, mediation and storage of our digitized life-bits. In this chapter, the author problematizes this state of the arts in relation to Bernard Stiegler’s concepts of mnemotechniques and mnemotechnologies. The transition from one to the other can be seen as a mutation from low-tech manual techniques of handling one’s memory to large-scale, automated mnemonic industries which, while providing immediate solutions for capturing and organizing the flows of memories, simultaneously benefit from them economically. The author argues that mnemotechnologies concerned with capturing have been eroding the use and significance of the term “recording”. He demonstrates this erosion along the trajectory from amateur practices of snap-shooting (enabled first by mass-produced cameras such as the Brownie) to ubiquitous computing of digital snapshots such as Facebook. What follows this discussion is a brief turn toward counter-practices that attempt to disrupt this current techno-political condition. Drawing on the concept of the post-digital, which through its call for a return to craft seems to correspond with the notion of mnemotechnique, as an epilogue to this chapter, the author speculates on alternative itineraries for how capturing and archiving practices can be re-invented today.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank my PhD supervisors Maria Hellström Reimer and Ulrika Sjöberg from the School of Arts and Communication at Malmö University. Their generous and inspiring comments and critique helped shape this text, which draws on my recently published doctoral thesis.

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. 1972. The Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
  2. Andrejevic, Mark. 2013. The Infinite Debt of Surveillance in the Digital Economy. In Media, Surveillance and Identity. Social Perspectives, ed. André Jansson and Miyase Christensen, 91–108. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, Gordon, and Jim Gemmell. 2009. Your Life, Uploaded. The Digital Way to Better Memory, Health, and Productivity. New York: A Plume Book, Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Bogost, Ian. 2010. Ian Became a Fan of Marshall McLuhan on Facebook and Suggested You Become a Fan Too. In Facebook and Philosophy: What’s in Your Mind? ed. D.E. Wittkower, 21–32. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  5. Brunton, Finn, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2015. Obfuscation. A User’s Guide for Privacy and Protest. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cascone, Kim. 2000. The Aesthetics of Failure: “Post-Digital” Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music. Computer Music Journal 24 (4): 392–398.Google Scholar
  7. Deuze, Mark. 2012. Media Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dodge, Martin, and Rob Kitchin. 2007. Outlines of a World Coming into Existence. Pervasive Computing and the Ethics of Forgetting. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 34 (3): 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emerson, Lori. 2014. Reading Writing Interfaces. From the Digital to the Bookbound. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ernst, Wolfgang. 2012. Digital Memory and the Archive. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flusser, Vilém. 2011. Into the Universe of Technical Images. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gower, H.D., L.S. Jast, and W.W. Topley. 1916. The Camera as Historian. London: Sampson Low, Marston and Co.Google Scholar
  13. Gross, Charles. 1995. Aristotle on the Brain. The Neuroscientist 1 (4): 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingold, Tim. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Kember, Sarah. 2014. Ubiquitous Photography and the Ambient Intelligent Amateur. In Auto. Self-Representation and Digital Photography, ed. Hans Hedberg, Gunilla Knape, Tyrone Martinsson, and Louise Wolthers. Stockholm: Art and Theory Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Lovink, Geert. 2011. Networks Without Cause. A Critique of Social Media. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ludovico, Alessandro. 2012. Post-Digital Print: The Mutation of Publishing Since 1894. Eindhoven: Onomatopee Office and Project-Space.Google Scholar
  18. Lund, Cornelia. 2015. If the Future Is Software-defined, What to Do with Our Hands? Post-Digital Commons and the Unintended from a Design Perspective. In Post-Digital Culture, ed. Daniel Kulle, Cornelia Lund, Oliver Schmidt, and David Ziegenhagen. http://www.post-digital-culture.org/clund.Google Scholar
  19. Nafus, Dawn, and Jamie Sherman. 2014. This One Does Not Go Up to 11. The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. In International Journal of Communication, vol. 8, 1784–1794.Google Scholar
  20. Schneier, Bruce. 2015. Data and Goliath. The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. New York and London: W.W Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  21. Smolicki, Jacek. 2015. De-totalizing Capture: On Personal Recording and Archiving Practices. In ISEA 2015. Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Electronic Arts, Vancouver, Canada, August 14–19, 2015. www.isea2015.org/proceeding/submissions/ISEA2015_submission_153.pdf
  22. ———. 2017. Para-archives: Rethinking Personal Archiving Practices in Capture Culture. PhD diss., Malmö University.Google Scholar
  23. Stiegler, Bernard. 1998. Technics and Time, 1. The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2003. Our Ailing Educational Institutions. Culture Machine, 5. http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/view/258/243
  25. ———. 2010. Memory. In Critical Terms for Media Studies, ed. W.J.T. Mitchell and Mark B.N. Hansen, 64–87. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2011. Suffocated Desire, or How the Cultural Industry Destroys the Individual: Contribution to the Theory of Mass Consumption. Parrhesia 13: 52–61.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2014. Symbolic Misery. The Hyperindustrial Epoch. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2016. What Makes Life Worth Living: On Pharmacology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. van Dijck, José. 2007. Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2013. Culture of Connectivity. A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Verbeek, Peter Paul. 2011. Moralizing Technology, Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Malmö UniversityMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations