From Cellphones to Machine Learning. A Shift in the Role of the User in Algorithmic Writing

  • Galit Wellner
Chapter

Abstract

Writing is frequently analyzed as a mode of communication. But writing can be done for personal reasons, to remind oneself of things to do, of thoughts, of events. The cellphone has revealed this shift, commencing as a communication device and ending up (at the moment) as a memory prosthesis that records what we see, hear, read and think. The recordings are not necessarily for communicating a message to others, but sometimes just for oneself. Today, when machine learning algorithms read, write and transmit, a new mode of communication arises that is not centered on the human. In this chapter the various phases of modern writing are modeled according to postphenomenology. As a branch of philosophy of technology, postphenomenology offers a set of analytical tools to study technologies and our relations to them. One of its central frameworks is the scheme of “I–technology–world.” The author proposes some modifications so that the scheme can systematically model the changes in the humans users, in machine learning algorithms imbued with non-human cognition and in the environments of readers, interlocutors and contexts.

References

  1. Feenberg, Andrew. 2006. Active and Passive Bodies: Don Ihde’s Phenomenology of the Body. In Postphenomenology: A Critical Companion to Ihde, ed. Evan Selinger, 189–196. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  2. Flew, Terry. 2008. New Media: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Forss, Anette. 2012 Cells and the (Imaginary) Patient: The Multistable Practitioner–Technology–Cell Interface in the Cytology Laboratory. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3, Aug.): 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goody, Jack. 1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, Martin. 1992. Parmenides. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Inidiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld. From Garden to Earth. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2010. Heidegger’s Technologies. Postphenomenological Perspectives. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2015. Preface: Positioning Postphenomenology. In Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations, ed. Robert Rosenberger and Peter-Paul Verbeek, vii–xvi. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  9. Irwin, Stacey O’Neal. 2016. Digital Media. Human–Technology Connection. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Just, Natascha, and Michael Latzer. 2017. Governance by Algorithms: Reality Construction by Algorithmic Selection on the Internet. Media, Culture & Society 39 (2): 238–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liberati, Nicola. 2016. Augmented Reality and Ubiquitous Computing: the Hidden Potentialities of Augmented Reality. AI & Society 31 (1): 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2013. Software Takes Command. New York and London: Bloomsberry Academics.Google Scholar
  14. Rosenberger, Robert. 2008. Perceiving Other Planets: Bodily Experience, Interpretation, and the Mars Orbiter Camera. Human Studies 31: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosenberger, Robert, and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2015. A Field Guide to Postphenomenology. In Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations, ed. Robert Rosenberger and Peter-Paul Verbeek, 9–41. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  16. Van Den, Eede. 2012. Yoni. Amor Technologiae. Marshall McLuhan as Philosopher of Technology—Toward a Philosophy of Human-media Relationships. Brussels: VUBPress.Google Scholar
  17. Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2008. Cyborg intentionality. Rethinking the Phenomenology of Human–Technology Relations. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 7: 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wellner, Galit. 2011. Wall-Window-Screen: How the Cell Phone Mediates a Worldview for Us. Humanities and Technology Review 30: 77–104.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2014. The Quasi-Face of the Cell Phone. Rethinking Alterity and Screens. Human Studies 37 (3): 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2015. A Postphenomenological Inquiry of Cell Phones. Genealogies, Meanings, and Becoming. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2017. I-Media-World. The Algorithmic Shift from Hermeneutic Relations to Writing Relations. In Postphenomenology and Media: Essays on Human–Media–World Relations, ed. Yoni Van den Eede, Stacey Irwin, and Galit Wellner, 207–228. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  22. Wiltse, Heather. 2014. Unpacking Digital Material Mediation. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 18 (3): 154–182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Galit Wellner
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.NB School of DesignHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Tel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations