Skip to main content

Postoperative Safety in Adult Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Postoperative Critical Care for Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients

Abstract

Patient safety is stated as the fundamental principle of good patient care (Summary of the evidence on patient safety: implications for research, WHO, Geneva, 2008). Nearly half (45%) of the adverse events in the Critical Care Safety Study were deemed preventable (Shostek, J Ambul Care Manage 30: 105–113, 2007). Patient safety incidents lead to unnecessary suffering and are a major cause of prolonged hospital stays. Human error is stated as the most common cause of patient safety incidents. Ensuring patient safety is becoming increasingly important for cardiac surgery intensive care unit practitioners. The cardiac surgery intensive care unit is particularly prone to medical errors because of the complexity of the patients, interdependence of the practitioners, and dependence on team functioning. Approaches related to high-reliability organizations (HRO) such as aviation have been applied in health care to prevent incidents and to ensure the delivery of proper care (Riley, J Nurs Manag 17: 238–246, 2009). Measurements of patient safety culture, teamwork, and continuous improvement and organizational learning, including team training with the use of simulation (Wilson et al., Qual Saf Health Care 14: 303–309, 2005), are all HRO approaches (Evidence scan: high reliability organizations, The Health Foundation, London, 2011) recommended as initiatives to improve quality and patient safety in health care. A culture of safety is created through changes in health personnel’s safety perspective and work behaviors, and human resource professionals are an essential contributor to this development. Human patient simulation-based training is a recommended method to make health-care professionals aware of the importance of teamwork and the aspects of team performance (Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the Twenty-First Century, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001). Team training program based on crew resource management can be used to improve efficiency, morale, and patient safety in health care (West et al., J Nurs Adm 42: 15–20, 2012). Several important factors play a role in fostering patient safety in the postoperative adult cardiac surgery intensive care unit environments, such as a patient safety culture, better communication, team performance, and team training strategies as initiatives for building patient safety within the adult cardiac surgery intensive care unit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aveling E-L, McCulloch P, Dixon-Woods M. A qualitative study comparing experiences of the surgical safety checklist in hospitals in high-income and low-income countries. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baker DP, Gustafson S, Beaubien JM, Salas E, Barach P. Medical team training programs in health care. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005. p. 253–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker D, Salas E, Barach P, Battles J, King H. The relation between teamwork and patient safety. In: Carayon P, editor. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. Mahawah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.; 2006. p. 259–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker DP, Amodeo AM, Krokos KJ, Slonim A, Herrera H. Assessing teamwork attitudes in healthcare: development of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork attitudes questionnaire. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:e49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barach P, Weinger MB. Trauma team performance. In: Wilson WC, Grande CM, Hoyt DB, editors. Emergency resuscitation, perioperative anesthesia, surgical management. New York: Informa HealthCare; 2007. p. 101–14.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barach P, Fromson J, Kamar R. Ethical and professional concerns of simulation in professional assessment and education. Am J Anesth. 2000;12:228–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger C. Multidisciplinary rounds: a method to improve quality and safety in critically ill patients. Northeast Florida Med. 2007;58(3):16–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JG, Wright MC, Smith PB, Jaggers J, Mistry KP. Adaptation of a postoperative handoff communication process for children with heart disease: a quantitative study. Am J Med Qual. 2011;26(5):380–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn AF, Croll ZT. Improving hospital patient safety through teamwork: the use of TeamSTEPPS in critical access hospitals. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper MD. Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Sci. 2000;36(2):111–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cypress BS. Family presence on rounds: a systematic review of literature. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2012;31(1):53–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dale CR, Bryson CL, Fan VS, et al. A greater analgesia, sedation, delirium order set quality score is associated with a decreased duration of mechanical ventilation in cardiovascular surgery patients. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2610–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, Badihi Y, Biesky M, Sprung CL, et al. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(2):294–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doucette JN. View from the cockpit: what the airline industry can teach us about patient safety. Nursing. 2006;36(11):50–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44:350–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson AC. Learning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:ii3–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eppich WJ, Brannen M, Hunt EA. Team training: implications for emergency and critical care pediatrics. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008;20(3):255–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch ZW, Debesa O, Ohkuma R, et al. A protocol-driven approach to early extubation after heart surgery. J Thorac Cardioasc Surg. 2014;147:2610–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flin R, Mearns K, O’Connor P, Bryden R. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1–3):177–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flin R, Burns C, Mearns K, Yule S, Robertson EM. Measuring safety climate in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:109–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • France DJ, Stiles R, Gaffney FA, et al. Home study program: crew resource management training-clinicians reactions and attitudes. AORN J. 2005;82(2):213–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel A, Grillo SP, Pittman M, Thomas EJ, Horowitz L, Page M, et al. Revealing and resolving patient safety defects: the impact of leadership Walk-Rounds on frontline caregiver assessments of patient safety. Health Serv Res. 2008;43:2050–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gaba DM. Human work environment and anesthesia simulators. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th ed. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; 2000. p. 2613–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldenmund FW. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Saf Sci. 2000;34:215–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halamek LP. The simulated delivery-room environment as the future modality for acquiring and maintaining skills in fetal and neonatal resuscitation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;13(6):448–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halm MA. Daily goals worksheets and other checklists: are our critical care units safer? Am J Crit Care. 2008;17(6):577–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond J, Bermann M, Chen B, Kushins L. Incorporation of a computerized human patient simulator in critical care training: a preliminary report. J Trauma. 2002;53:1064–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, et al. Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group, Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:102–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL, Merritt AC, Wilhelm JA. The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1999;9(1):19–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt EA, Shilkofski NA, Stavroudis TA, Nelson KL. Simulation: translation to improved team performance. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25(2):301–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IOM. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Commission Resources. Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals: the official handbook. Oak Brook, IL: Joint Commission Resources; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman J, Twite M, Barrett C, Peyton C, Koehler J, Rannie M, Kahn MG, Schofield S, Ing RJ, Jaggers J, Hyman D, da Cruz EM. A handoff protocol from the cardiovascular operating room to cardiac ICU is associated with improvements in care beyond the immediate postoperative period. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39:306–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilic A, Whitman JG. Blood transfusions in cardiac surgery: indications risks, and conservation strategies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:726–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim MM, Barnato AE, Angus DC, Fleisher LF, Kahn JM. The effect of multidisciplinary care teams on intensive care unit mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(4):369–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lamba AR, Linn K, Fletcher KE. Identifying patient safety problems during team rounds: an ethnographic study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(8):667–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(6):377–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl.1):i85–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr JJ, Batalden PB, Barach P. Inquiring into the quality and safety of care in the academic clinical microsystem. In: McLaughlin K, Kaluzny A, editors. Continuous quality improvement in health care. 3rd ed. New York: Aspen; 2005. p. 407–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morello RT, Lowthian JA, Barker AL, McGinnes R, Dunt D, Brand C. Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(1):11–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieva VF, Sorra J. Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(Suppl):12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe RA. Employee training and development. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patient Safety Primer: safety culture. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/5/safety-culture. 2016. November 8.

  • Petrovic MA, Aboumatar H, Baumgartner WA, et al. Pilot implementation of a perioperative protocol to guide operating room-to-intensive care unit patient handoffs. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:11–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer JS, Sutton R. The knowing-doing gap: how smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson DJ. Daily multidisciplinary ICU rounds improve patient outcomes. Chicago, IL: AHC Media—Continuing Medical Education Publishing; 2010. p. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pothier D, Monteiro P, Mooktiar M, Shaw A. Pilot study to show the loss of important data in nursing handover. Br J Nurs. 2005;12(20):1090–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2725–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reason J. Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice. Work Stress. 1998;12:293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley W. High reliability and implications for nursing leaders. J Nurs Manag. 2009;17(2):238–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romig M, Goeschel C, Pronovost P, Berenholtz SM. Integrating CUSP and TRIP to improve patient safety. Hosp Pract. 2010;38:114–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen SE, Bochkoris M, Hannon MJ, Kwoh CK. Family-centered multidisciplinary rounds enhance the team approach in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2009;123(4):e603–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saladino L, Pickett LC, Frush K, Mall A, Champagne MT. Evaluation of a nurse-led safety program in a critical care unit. J Nurs Care Qual. 2013;28(2):139–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salas E, Stagl KC, Burke CS. 25 years of team effectiveness in organizations: research themes and emerging needs. In: Cooper CL, Robertson IT, editors. International review of industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Wiley; 2004. p. 47–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas E, Wilson KA, Burke CS, Wightman DC. Does crew resource management training work? An update, an extension, and some critical needs. Hum Factors. 2006;48(2):392–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salas E, Wilson KA, Murphy CE. What crew resource management training will not do for patient safety: unless…. J Patient Saf. 2007;3(2):62–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas E, DizGranados D, Weaver SJ, King H. Does team training work? Principles for health care. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:1002–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sammer CE, Lykens K, Singh KP, Mains DA, Lackan NA. What is patient safety culture? A review of the literature. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010;42(2):156–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segall N, Bonifacio AS, Schroeder RA, et al. Can we make postoperative patient handovers safer? A systematic review of the literature. Anesth Analg. 2012;115: 102–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL. Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):745–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shahian DM, Edwards FH, Ferraris VA, et al. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force: Quality measurement in adult cardiac surgery: Part 1-Conceptual framework and measure selection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:S3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shake JG, Pronovost PJ, Whitman GJ. Cardiac surgical ICU care: eliminating “preventable” complications. J Card Surg. 2013;28:406–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shostek K. Developing a culture of safety in ambulatory care settings. J Ambul Care Manage. 2007;30(2):105–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinuff T, Muscedere J, Adhikari NK, Stelfox HT, Dodek P, Heyland DK, Rubenfeld GD, Cook DJ, Pinto R, Manoharan V, Currie J, Cahill N, Friedrich JO, Amaral A, Piquette D, Scales DC, Dhanani S, Garland A, KRITICAL Working Group, the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, and the Canadian Critical Care Society. Knowledge translation interventions for critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2627–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sorbero ME et al. Outcome measures for effective teamwork in inpatient care. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone ME Jr, Snetman D, O’Neill A, Cucuzzo J, Lindner J, Ahmad S, Teperman S. Daily multidisciplinary rounds to implement the ventilator bundle decreases ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma patients but does it affect outcome? Surg Infect. 2011;12(5):373–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum S. A strategic view of organizational training and learning. In: Kraiger K, editor. Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 10–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Health Foundation. Evidence scan: high reliability organisations. London: The Health Foundation; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas EJ, Taggart B, Crandell S, et al. Teaching teamwork during the neonatal resuscitation program: a randomized trial. J Perinatol. 2007;27(7):409–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Neilands TB, Frankel A, Helmreich RL. The effect of executive walk rounds on nurse safety climate attitudes: a randomized trial of clinical units. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen B. On the journey to a culture of patient safety. Health Q. 2008;11:58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vats A, Goin KH, Villarreal MC, Yilmaz T, Fortenberry JD, Keskinocak P. The impact of lean rounding process in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2011;40(2):607–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ. Balancing “no blame” with accountability in patient safety. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1401–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver SJ, Lyons R, DiazGranados D, Rosen MA, Salas E, Odlesby J, et al. The anatomy of health care team training and the state of practice: a critical review. Acad Med. 2010;85:1746–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West P, Sculli G, Fore A, Okam N, Dunlap C, Neily J, Mills P. Improving patient safety and optimizing nursing teamwork using Crew Resource Management techniques. J Nurs Adm. 2012;42(1):15–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. Summary of the evidence on patient safety: implications for research. Geneva: WHO; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. Patient safety research. Geneva: WHO; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegmann DA, Zhang H, von Thaden TL, Sharma G, Gibbons AM. Safety culture: an integrative review. Int J Aviation Psych. 2009;14:117–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA, Salas E. Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(4):303–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yaeger KA, Arafeh JM. Making the move from traditional neonatal education to simulation-based training. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008;22(2):154–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwarenstein M, Reeves S. Working together but apart: barriers and routes to nurse-physician collaboration. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28:242–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice Chan R.N., M.N., C.N.S., C.C.R.N. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chan, A., Esmailian, F. (2018). Postoperative Safety in Adult Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit. In: Dabbagh, A., Esmailian, F., Aranki, S. (eds) Postoperative Critical Care for Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75747-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75747-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75746-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75747-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics