Skip to main content

Implementation of Near-Fault Forward Directivity Effects in Seismic Design Codes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1502 Accesses

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 46))

Abstract

Near-fault ground motions exhibiting forward directivity effects are critical for seismic design because they impose very large seismic demands on buildings due to their large-amplitude pulselike waveforms. The current challenge in seismic design codes is to recommend simple (easy-to-apply) yet proper rules to explain the near-fault forward directivity (NFFD) phenomenon for seismic demands. This effort is not new and has been the subject of research for over two decades. This paper contributes to these efforts and proposes an alternative set of rules to modify the elastic design spectrum of 475-year and 2475-year return periods for NFFD effects. The directivity rules discussed here are evolved from a relatively large number of probabilistic earthquake scenarios (probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, PSHA) that employ two recent directivity models. The paper first gives the background of the probabilistic earthquake scenarios and then introduces the proposed NFFD rules for seismic design codes. We conclude the paper by presenting some cases with the proposed rules to see how spectral amplitudes modify due to directivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The style-of-faulting is 90 degrees dipping strike-slip fault throughout this study. Thus, the results presented here are strictly valid for strike-slip faults although the estimated near-fault spectral amplifications may also be valid for dip-slip faults provided the controlling conditions are similar.

References

  • Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68:94–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Moghimi S, Arıcı Y (2018) A study on major seismological and fault-site parameters affecting near-fault directivity ground-motion demands due to strike-slip faulting for their possible inclusion in seismic design codes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 104:88–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2001) Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures. The John A. Blume Earthquake Center Report No. 138, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2004) Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33:687–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker JW (2007) Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1486–1501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertero V, Mahin S, Herrera R (1978) A seismic design implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 6:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290060105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2010) Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:1830–1835. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson G (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra 24:99–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA (2006) Orientation independent measures of ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:1502–1511. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorgnia Y, Abrahamson NA, Al-Atik L, Ancheta TD, Atkinson GM, Baker JW et al (2014) NGA-West2 research project. Earthq Spectra 30:973–987. https://doi.org/10.1193/072113EQS209M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CALTRANS (2013) Seismic design criteria. California Department of Transportation: Sacramento. Version 1.7

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai JF, Loh CH, Chen CY (2000) Consideration of the near fault effect on seismic design code for sites near the Chelungpu fault. J Chin Inst Eng 23:447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chioccarelli E, Iervolino I (2010) Near-source seismic demand and pulse-like records: a discussion for L’Aquila earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39:1039–1062. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30:1117–1153. https://doi.org/10.1193/072813EQS219M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Krawinkler H (1999) Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures. Report No. 132, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, (132)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall JF et al (1995) Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings. Earthq Spectra 11:569–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X et al (2007) Response spectrum of seismic design code for zones lack of near-fault strong earthquake records. Acta Seismologica Sismica Engl Ed 20:447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(3):1099–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghimi S (2017) Addressing the near-fault directivity effects for their implementation to design spectrum. PhD dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering Middle East Technical University, Ankara Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Standard (NZS) 1170.5:2004 (2004) Structural design actions part 5: earthquake actions. New Zealand – Commentary

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahi SK, Baker JW (2011) An empirically calibrated framework for including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:742–755. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville PG (2003) Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse. Phys Earth Planet Inter 137:201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00015-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol Res Lett 68:199–222. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spudich P, Bayless JR, Baker J, Chiou BSJ, Rowshandel B, Shahi S, Somerville P (2013) Final report of the NGA-West2 directivity working group. Pacific Engineering Research Center Report. PEER Report 2013/09. NGA West 2 Database

    Google Scholar 

  • Spudich P, Rowshandel B, Shahi SK, Baker JW, Chiou BSJ (2014) Comparison of NGA-West2 directivity models. Earthquake Spectra 30:1199–1221. https://doi.org/10.1193/080313EQS222M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tothong P, Cornell CA, Baker JW (2007) Explicit directivity-pulse inclusion in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthquake Spectra 23:867–891. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2790487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uniform Building Code. (UBC) (1997) Uniform Building Code. International Conference Building Officials, Whittier

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Mohammad-Alizadeh H (2012) Improvement of Iranian seismic design code considering the near-fault effects. Int J Eng 25:147–158. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ije.2012.25.02c.08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngs RR, Coppersmith KJ (1985) Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence mtpfdodels to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates. Bulletin of the Se

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is financially supported by the Scientific and Technical Council of Turkey with an award number 113 M308. The authors express their sincere gratitude for this support provided by the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinan Akkar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Akkar, S., Moghimi, S. (2018). Implementation of Near-Fault Forward Directivity Effects in Seismic Design Codes. In: Pitilakis, K. (eds) Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering in Europe. ECEE 2018. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75741-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics