Tax Sources of Funding the Road Network as a Tool to Increase Transport Energy Efficiency

  • I. Mayburov
  • Y. Leontyeva
Part of the Innovation and Discovery in Russian Science and Engineering book series (IDRSE)


The goals of the paper are to study the financing structure of Russian road construction and to identify the contribution share of the vehicles owners in road construction. The conclusion is drawn that most of the roads do not meet the standards, and the negative effects of using a poor-quality road network are analyzed. Besides that the paper analyzes regional imbalances in the level of car ownership and the development of roads. The development dynamics and structure of the road network are analyzed. The authors consider reasons for the slow pace of road network expansion in Russia and look at trends in transport tax revenues and road construction expenditures. It is concluded that there is a number of objective reasons that require far higher spending on road construction in this country in comparison with developed economies. Types of vehicle taxes and fees are studied. It is found that only some of the charges build a link between the amount paid and the intensity of road use by the taxpayer. Sources of government funding for road funds are explored. The research shows that the fiscal and regulatory role of transport tax should be enhanced in regions with medium, high, and very high levels of private car ownership. The authors analyze the possibility of increasing fiscal and regulatory significance of transport taxes and charges. The conclusion that improving the quality of the road network will lead to a reduction in specific fuel consumption and improve the energy efficiency of transportation is justified.


Road network Quality Government revenue Road network funding Transport tax Road maintenance funds 



The work was supported by the Humanitarian Scientific Foundation of the Russian Federation, contract № 17-22-21001.


  1. 1.
    Schwab, K., Xavier, S.M., The Global Competitiveness Report 2012–2013, World Economic Forum, The Global Benchmarking Network. Geneva (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Botlikova, M., Botlik, J., Vaclavinkova, K.: Negative impacts of transport infrastructure funding. In: Creating Global Competitive Economies: 2020 Vision Planning and Implementation Proceedings of the 22nd International Business Information Management Association Conference in Italy, Rome, vols. 1–3, pp. 1141–1152 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Doll, C., Van Essen, H.: Road infrastructure cost and revenue in Europe. Produced Within the Study Internalization Measures and Policies for all External Cost of Transport (IMPACT), Deliverable 2, Delft (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Magaril, E., Abrzhina, L., Belyaeva, M.: Environmental damage from the combustion of fuels: Challenges and methods of economic assessment. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 190(2), 1105–1115 (2014.) WIT Press: UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delucchi, M.: Do motor-vehicle users in the US pay their way? Transport. Res. Part A. 41(10), 982–1003 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Borger, B.: Optimal congestion taxes in a time allocation model. Transport. Res. Part B Methodol. 45(1), 79–95 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mayburov, I., Leontieva, Y.: Transport tax in Russia as a promising tool for reduction of airborne emissions and development of road network. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 198, 391–402 (2015.) WIT Press, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Mayburov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Y. Leontyeva
    • 1
  1. 1.Ural Federal University, Russian FederationEkaterinburgRussia
  2. 2.Far Eastern Federal University, Russian FederationVladivostokRussia

Personalised recommendations