Advertisement

Evaluation of Energy-Related Projects in Remote Areas

  • A. Domnikov
  • M. Petrov
  • L. Domnikova
Chapter
Part of the Innovation and Discovery in Russian Science and Engineering book series (IDRSE)

Abstract

The paper summarizes and systematizes the accumulated methodological approaches for evaluating the effectiveness of energy-related projects for newly developed areas. It gives the rationale for the cost-benefit system and describes peculiarities of objectives and criteria of selection of aggregation levels when substantiating options of establishing power facilities in remote areas. The proposed methodological approaches are illustrated for a wide range of energy projects: from the distributed power facilities to the megaproject of implementation of the energy strategy for newly developed areas of the Russian Arctic.

Keywords

Energy Projects Energy Facilities Developed Areas Electricity System Effectiveness Remote Areas 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The work was supported by Act 211 Government of the Russian Federation, contract № 02.A03.21.0006 and Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), contract № 16-06-00317.

References

  1. 1.
    Tatarkin, A., Petrov, M., Litovskiy, V.: The Arctic Urals in the system of congruous areas: Scientific approaches and economic practice. Prob. Anal. Public Admin. 6(38), Vol. 7, 25–44 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berens, B., Havranek, P.: Guidelines for Assessing the Effectiveness of Investment, pp. 127–154. INFRA-M, Moscow (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Domnikov, A.Y.: Aspects of multi-criteria analysis for technical re-equipment of power plants [in Russian]. Ser. Econ. Manag. Ekaterinburg Ural State Tech. Univ. 1(53), 25–36 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braid, R.B.: The importance of cumulative impact assessment and mitigation. Energy UK. 5, 643–652 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Domnikov, A.Y.: The strategy of increasing the competitive advantages of the territorial system of cogeneration energy, [in Russian]. Sci. Inform. J. Econ. 1(38), 35–47 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Domnikov, A., Chebotareva, G., Khodorovsky, M.: Systematic approach to diagnosis lending risks in project finance [in Russian]. Audit Finan. Anal. 2, 114–119 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ward Jr., J.H.: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58(301), 236–2446 (1963)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khodorovsky, M., Domnikov, A., Khomenko, P.: Optimization of financing investments in a power-generation company. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 1, 45–54 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Domnikov, A., Khomenko, P., Chebotareva, G.: A risk-oriented approach to capital management at a power generation company in Russia. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 1, 13–24 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Domnikov, A., Khodorovsky, M., Khomenko, P.: Optimization of finances into regional energy. Econ. Reg. 2, 248–253 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Domnikov
    • 1
  • M. Petrov
    • 2
  • L. Domnikova
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Banking and Investment ManagementUral Federal UniversityYekaterinburgRussia
  2. 2.Institute of EconomicsThe Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations