Cost Calculation of Thin-Walled Structures Using Different Manufacturing Techniques

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The calculation of costs is important to improve competitiveness of thin-walled elements. In the optimization process the design, fabrication and economy are combined. Several optimization techniques are available. The different manufacturing technologies are the joining (welding, gluing, riveting), cutting, forming, cleaning, painting etc. Within the given technology groups there are several different technologies available like at welding: shielded arc welding, gas metal arc welding, submerged arc welding, laser welding, plasma welding, etc. Also, at the cutting group: propane gas, mixed gas, laser cutting, plasma cutting, waterjet cutting, etc. The cost calculation includes these using for thin plates and sections.

Keywords

Cost calculation Welding technologies Structural optimization 

References

  1. 1.
    Klansek, U., Kravanja, S.: Cost estimation, optimization and competitiveness of different composite floor systems – Part 1: self manufacturing cost estimation of composite and steel structures. J. Constr. Steel Res. 62(5), 434–448 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jalkanen, J.: Tubular truss optimization using heuristic algorithms. Ph.D. thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Finland. 104 p. (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tímár, I., Horváth, P., Borbély, T.: Optimierung von profilierten Sandwichbalken. Stahlbau 72(2), 109–113 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farkas, J., Jármai, K.: Analysis and Optimum Design of Metal Structures. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, Brookfield (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Farkas, J., Jármai, K.: Economic Design of Metal Structures, 340 p. Millpress Science Publisher, Rotterdam (2003). ISBN 90 77017 99 2Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farkas, J., Jármai, K.: Design and Optimization of Metal Structures, p. 328. Horwood Publishers, Chichester (2008). ISBN 978-1-904275-29-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mela, K., Heinisuo, M.: Weight and Cost Optimization of Welded High Strength Steel Beams. Eng. Struct. 79(15), 354–364 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Kovács, G., Farkas, J.: Minimum cost design of overhead crane beam with box section strengthened by CFRP laminates. Struct. Eng. Mech. 61(4), 475–481 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pahl, G., Beelich, K.H.: Kostenwachstumsgesetze nach Ähnlichkeits-beziehungen für Schweiss-verbindungen. VDI-Bericht, Nr. 457, 129–141, Düsseldorf (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jármai, K., Farkas, J.: Cost calculation and optimization of welded steel structures. J. Constr. Steel Res. 50(2), 115–135 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bodt, H.J.M.: The Global Approach to Welding Costs. The Netherlands Institute of Welding, The Hague (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    COSTCOMP: Programm zur Berechnung der Schweisskosten. Deutscher Verlag für Schweisstechnik, Düsseldorf (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ott, H.H., Hubka, V.: Vorausberechnung der Herstellkosten von Schweiss-konstruktionen (Fabrication cost calculation of welded structures). In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design ICED, Hamburg, Heurista, Zürich, pp. 478–487 (1985)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Estimating and comparing weld metal costs. http://www.esabna.com/euweb/awtc/lesson9_1.htm. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Dawes, C.: Laser Welding: A Practical Guide, 258 p. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Laser Comparison – Cutting Speed and Rate of Feed. http://jmtusa.com/laser-comparison-cutting-speed-and-rate-of-feed/. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
  20. 20.
    Lincoln Electric Cutting speeds. https://torchmate.com/metric-measures/Recommended-Cut-Speeds. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
  21. 21.
    KMT Waterjet Calculator for 90,000 PSI - 50,000 PSI Cutting Speeds. https://www.kmtwaterjet.com/kmt-cut-calculator.aspx. Accessed 27 Dec 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MiskolcMiskolc, EgyetemvárosHungary

Personalised recommendations