Fatigue Performance of GMA-Brazed Non-load Carrying Joints Made of Ultra-High-Strength Steel

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

With the aim of maximizing energy efficiency, the use of low-alloyed ultra-high strength steels (UHSS) has greatly increased in vehicles and other transport applications in recent decades. Using UHSS, equivalent ultimate load capacity can be achieved with less material than when using conventional structural steels. Along with increased static load, structures commonly made of UHSS are often subjected to high cyclic load, and good fatigue strength is thus demanded. In this study, the fatigue strength was obtained for gas metal arc (GMA)-brazed non-load carrying joints made of S960 MC plates. CuMn13Al7 and CuAl8 were used as braze alloys. In addition, the work evaluated the potential of gas metal arc brazing (GMAB) as a post-weld improvement technique. A total of 21 different test specimens were manufactured and tested with constant amplitude fatigue tests with an applied stress ratio of R = 0.1. Notch effects of the braze joints were investigated numerically using finite element analysis (FEA). Depending on the braze alloy and joint configuration, mean nominal fatigue strengths of FATmean = 134–192 MPa were obtained, indicating that GMAB is a promising joining method for structures made of UHSS. The FEA results showed that for the studied materials and joints, stress concentration induced in the joint can decrease approximately by 20% when GMAB is applied instead of fusion welding.

Keywords

Fatigue strength Ultra-High Strength Steel Gas Metal Arc Brazing Fatigue strength improvement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank SSAB, DIMECC Ltd. and the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation (TEKES) for the funding in the BSA (Breakthrough Steels and Applications) program, and the funding of HRO Design Forum, which together enabled this research work to be completed.

References

  1. 1.
    Björk, T., Toivonen, J., Nykänen, T.: Capacity of fillet welded joints made of ultra high-strength steel. Weld. World 56, 71–84 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quintino, L., Pimenta, G., Iordachescu, D., et al.: MIG brazing of galvanized thin sheet joints for automotive industry. Mater. Manuf. Process. 21, 63–73 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1081/AMP-200060621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim, Y., Park, K., Kwak, S.: A review of arc brazing process and its application in automotive. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Robot Res. 5, 246–250 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.18178/ijmerr.5.4.246-250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nikitin, A., Schleuss, L., Ossenbrink, R., Michailov, V.: Corrosion behavior of brazed zinc-coated structured sheet metal. Int. J. Corros. 1–8 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4768505. Article ID 4768505
  5. 5.
    Janota, M., Neumann, H.: Share of spot welding and other joining methods in automotive production. Weld. World 52, 12–16 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03266625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murakami, T., Nakata, K., Tong, H., Ushio, M.: Dissimilar metal joining of aluminum to steel by MIG arc brazing using flux cored wire. ISIJ Int. 43, 1596–1602 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.43.1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bergmann, J.P., Wilden, J., Reich, S., Goecke, S.F.: Methods and solutions for joining plates made from different metals using voltaic arc welding. Weld. Int. 23, 895–903 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09507110902843289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reisgen, U., Angerhausen, M., Pipinikas, A., et al.: The effect of arc brazing process parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of high-strength steel HCT780XD using the copper-based filler metal CuAl8. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 249, 549–558 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.06.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Varol, F., Ferik, E., Ozsarac, U., Aslanlar, S.: Influence of current intensity and heat input in Metal Inert Gas-brazed joints of TRIP 800 thin zinc coated steel plates. Mater. Des. 52, 1099–1105 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joseph, A., Webb, C., Haramia, M., Yapp, D.: Variable polarity (AC) arc weld brazing of galvanized sheet. IIW-document XII-1779-03 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Basak, S., Pal, T.K., Shome, M.: High-cycle fatigue behavior of MIG brazed galvanized DP600 steel sheet joint—effect of process parameters. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 82, 1197–1211 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7451-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharma, A., Lee, S.J., Choi, D.Y., Jung, J.P.: Effect of brazing current and speed on the bead characteristics, microstructure, and mechanical properties of the arc brazed galvanized steel sheets. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 249, 212–220 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lepistö, J.S., Marquis, G.B.: MIG brazing as a means of fatigue life improvement. Weld. World 48, 28–40 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gericke, A., Glienke, R., Henkel, K-M., et al.: Reduction of the notch effect of non-loaded attachments on steel structures through arc brazing. In: 70th IIW Annual Assembly and International Conference - Communication XIII - WG2 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    EN 1011-1: Welding - Recommendations for welding of metallic materials - Part 1: General guidance for arc welding (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hobbacher, A.: Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components, 2nd edn. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Radaj, D., Sonsino, C.M., Fricke, W.: Fatigue Assessment of Welded Joints by Local Approaches, 2nd edn. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sonsino, C.M., Fricke, W., De Bruyne, F., et al.: Notch stress concepts for the fatigue assessment of welded joints - Background and applications. Int. J. Fatigue 34, 2–16 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fricke, W.: IIW Recommendations for the Fatigue Assessment of Welded Structures by Notch Stress Analysis. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baumgartner, J., Bruder, T.: An efficient meshing approach for the calculation of notch stresses. Weld. World 57, 137–145 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-012-0005-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Skriko, T., Björk, T., Nykänen, T.: Effects of weaving technique on the fatigue strength of transverse loaded fillet welds made of ultra-high-strength steel. Weld. World 58, 377–387 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-014-0123-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ahola, A., Nykänen, T., Björk, T.: Effect of loading type on the fatigue strength of asymmetric and symmetric transverse non-load carrying attachments. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 40, 670–682 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karppi, R., Leiviskä, P., Laitinen, R.: Developments in MAG-welding for ultra high strength steel; Optim 960 QC. In: International Symposium “From Welding and Fracture Mechanics to Pipeline Technolgy”, pp. 1–20 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland

Personalised recommendations