Skip to main content

Fundamentals of Retractors and Exposure

  • 2254 Accesses

Abstract

Proper exposure is critical to maximizing safety and efficiency in the operating room. An operative field should be large enough to allow the operating surgeon and assistants to visualize critical anatomy and manipulate instruments comfortably and also no larger than necessary in order to minimize iatrogenic injury. There are many varieties of surgical retractors, and the ability to choose the right tool for the job can help meet the goal of keeping the view clear and the wound small.

Traditional stainless steel open surgical retractors were designed alongside the procedure they were intended to assist, with shapes that were carefully considered to meet a specific need. Effective, versatile designs have persisted to become common surgical instruments found in operating rooms worldwide. The evolution of material science, laparoscopic, and robotic procedures brought with them new instrumentation for retraction. Some minimally invasive retractors appear to be miniature versions of their open counterparts, while in some circumstances, entirely new instrumentation has been developed to meet previously nonexistent needs.

The following chapter reviews technical considerations of surgical exposure, from patient positioning to economy of motion. A useful scalar paradigm for retraction is introduced—large-scale field exposure, effective recruitment of the operative assistant, and moment-by-moment use of the surgeon’s nondominant hand. Additionally, types of surgical retractors available for open and laparoscopic surgery are described and categorized for convenient reference.

Keywords

  • General surgery
  • Exposure
  • Visualization
  • Retraction
  • Retractor

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75656-1_6
  • Chapter length: 11 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-75656-1
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 6.1
Fig. 6.2
Fig. 6.3
Fig. 6.4
Fig. 6.5
Fig. 6.6
Fig. 6.7
Fig. 6.8
Fig. 6.9
Fig. 6.10
Fig. 6.11

Suggested Readings

  • Chassin’s chapter on Incision, Exposure, Closure in open abdominal surgery: Scott-Conner CEH, editors. Chassin’s operative strategy in general surgery. New York: Springer. p. 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review and rationale for ergonomic laparoscopic port placement: Supe AN, Kulkarni GV, Supe PA. Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2010;6(2):31–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.65161.

References

  1. Scott-Conner CEH, Chassin JL. Incision, exposure, closure. In: Scott-Conner CEH, editor. Chassin’s operative strategy in general surgery. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 19–25.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Mynbaev OA, et al. Bladeless direct optical trocar insertion in laparoscopic procedures on the obese patient. JSLS. 2013;17(4):521–8. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13693422519398.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Supe AN, Kulkarni GV, Supe PA. Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2010;6(2):31–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.65161.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Angelo A-LD, Rutherford DN, Ray RD, Laufer S, Mason A, Pugh CM. Working volume: validity evidence for a motion based metric of surgical efficiency. Am J Surg. 2016;211(2):445–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.005.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee P, Waxman K, Taylor B, et al. Use of wound-protection system and postoperative wound-infection rates in open appendectomy. Arch Surg. 2009;144:872–5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Sookhai S, Redmond HP, Deasy JM. Impervious wound-edge protector to reduce postoperative wound infection: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353:1585.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nozaki T, Kato T, Komiya A, Fuse H. Retraction-related acute liver failure after urological laparoscopic surgery. Curr Urol. 2013;7:199–203.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael B. Ujiki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ujiki, M.B., Mason Hedberg, H. (2018). Fundamentals of Retractors and Exposure. In: Palazzo, F. (eds) Fundamentals of General Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75656-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75656-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75655-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75656-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)