Advertisement

The Use of Simulation in the Training for Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Pain

  • Konstantin V. Slavin
  • Dali Yin
Chapter
Part of the Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation book series (CHS)

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) requires training to maximize its therapeutic effect and minimize surgical risks to the patients. Learning through the observation and operation in the operating room (OR) has been the majority of surgical training, which has faced many issues, including patient safety, work hour limitations, and cost of OR time. SCS has been developed as an established treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. Proper electrode insertion is one of the most important technical parts of SCS approach, which is related to a good outcome of patients. However, high levels of functioning in these patients with chronic pain have prevented hands-on training for surgeons. Simulation-based surgical training provides an opportunity to teach surgeons and allow them to practice surgical procedures outside the OR in high-quality and time-effective manner. This chapter focuses on the simulation of SCS procedure for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.

Keywords

Simulation Neurosurgery training Chronic pain Spinal cord stimulation 

References

  1. 1.
    Andersson GBJ. Epidemiological features of chronic lowback pain. Lancet. 1999;354(9178):581–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of low back pain, best practice and research. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(6):769–81.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams MA. Biomechanics of back pain. Acupunct Med. 2004;22(4):178–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katz JN. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(2):21–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luo X, Pietrobon R, Sun SX, Liu GG, Hey L. Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States. Spine. 2004;29(1):79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slavin K. Epidural spinal cord stimulation: indications and technique. In: Schulder M, editor. Handbook of functional and stereotactic surgery. NewYork: Marcel Dekker; 2002. p. 417–30.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burchiel KJ, Slavin KV. Peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes. In: Batjer HH, Loftus CM, editors. Textbook of neurological surgery. Philadelphia: LWW; 2003. p. 3013–22.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henderson JM, Levy RM, Bedder MD, Staats PS, Slavin KV, Poree LR, North RB. NANS training requirements for spinal cord stimulation devices: selection, implantation, and follow-up. Neuromodulation. 2009;12(3):171–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De La Cruz P, Fama C, Roth S, Haller J, Willocj M, Lange S, Pilitsis J. Predictors of spinal cord stimulation success. Neuromodulation. 2015;18(7):599–602.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bilimoria KY, Phillips JD, Rock CE, et al. Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1799–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvist LE. Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:657–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alaraj A, Lemole MG, Finkle JH, Yudkowsky R, Wallace A, Luciano C, Banerjee PP, Rizzi SH, Charbel FT. Virtual reality training in neurosurgery: review of current status and future applications. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alaraj A, Charbel FT, Birk D, Tobin M, Luciano C, Banerjee PP, Rizzi S, Sorenson J, Foley K, Slavin K, Roitberg B. Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(Suppl 1):115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations