Advertisement

Political Elites’ Power Interest and Rational Decision Making

  • Maurizio Geri
Chapter
  • 185 Downloads
Part of the Minorities in West Asia and North Africa book series (MWANA)

Abstract

This chapter presents the first variable/hypothesis with a theoretical background, then it applies the theory to the case studies and gives evidence that Turkey passed from securitization to some forms of autonomization to resecuritization again during the democratization and that Indonesia took the opposite path. This chapter therefore discusses rational choice theory in comparative politics, an approach that sees elites’ rational decision on costs and benefits as the reason for every policy. In brief, when the political costs of toleration are higher than the political costs of repression, the state will choose a path of accommodation; in the converse case, the state will choose repression and securitization. In the cases of both Turkey and Indonesia, the findings are that the elites’ power interests have been important in contributing to the alternations between autonomization and securitization of ethnic minorities.

Keywords

Islamic Elite Acehnese securitizationSecuritization Kurdish Minority Kemalist Elite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akkoc, Raziye. 2015. A Parallel State Within Turkey? How the Country’s Democracy Came Under Attack from Two Men’s Rivalry”. The Daily Telegraph, February 24, 2015. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/turkey/11397876/A-parallel-state-within-Turkey-How-the-countrys-democracy-came-underattack-from-two-mens-rivalry.html. Accessed 16 Apr 2016.
  2. Akyol, Mustafa. 2015. Who Killed the Turkey-PKK Peace Process? Al Monitor, August 4, 2015. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/08/turkey-syria-iraq-pkk-peace-process-who-killed-kurds.html. Accessed 9 Apr 2016.
  3. Al Qurtuby, Sumanto. 2015. Interethnic Violence, Separatism and Political Reconciliation in Turkey and Indonesia. India Quarterly 71 (2): 126–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albay, Erdogan. 2016. Turkey’s President Erdogan Shows Machiavellian Instincts Yet Again. Foreign Policy Journal, May 13, 2016. http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/05/13/turkeys-president-erdogan-shows-machiavellian-instincts-yet-again/. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  5. Amberin, Zaman. 2015. A Bombing in Ankara and Erdogan’s Political War for Total Power. Foreign Policy, October 15, 2015. http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/10/15/a-bombing-in-ankara-and-erdogans-political-war-for-total-power/. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  6. Arando, Tim, and Ceylan Yeginsumay. 2016. How Erdogan Moved to Solidify Power by Ousting a Pivotal Ally. New York Times, May 5, 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/06/world/europe/ahmet-davutoglu-turkey-prime-minister.html?_r=0. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  7. Aslan, Senem. 2015. Different Faces of Turkish Islamic Nationalism. In Rethinking Nation and Nationalism, Project on the Middle East and Political Science, POMPES Studies n. 14, June 2, 2015, p. 10.Google Scholar
  8. Awaluddin, Hamid. 2008. Why Is Peace in Aceh Successful?. Conciliation Resources. Accord Issue: 20: 25.Google Scholar
  9. BBC News. 2017. Turkey Coup: Purge Widens to Education Sector. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36838347. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  10. Bechev, Dimitar. 2015. The Travails of Democracy in Turkey. In The Uncertain Path of the ‘New Turkey’, ed. Valeria Talbot. Milan: ISPI.Google Scholar
  11. Bengio, Ofra. 2011. The ‘Kurdish Spring’ in Turkey and Its Impact on Turkish Foreign Relations in the Middle East. Turkish Studies 12 (4): 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruce Bueno de Mesquita. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Burton, Michael, Richard Gunther, and John Higley. 1992. Introduction: Elite Transformations and Democratic Regimes. In Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe, ed. John Higley and Richard Gunther. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, Desmond and Suzan Fraser. 2015. Erdogan Slams Brakes on Kurdish Peace Process Ahead of Polls. Salon, April 8, 2015. http://www.salon.com/2015/04/08/erdogan_slams_brakes_on_kurdish_peace_process_ahead_of_polls/. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  15. Cagaptay, Soner. 2011. From Ataturk to Erdogan: Reshaping Turkey. Washington Post, August 14, 2011. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/from-ataturk-to-erdogan-reshaping-turkey/2011/08/11/gIQA5lKjFJ_story.html. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  16. Cesari, Jocelyn. 2014. The Awakening of Muslim Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CIA Factbook. 2016. Turkey. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tu.html. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  18. Collier, Ruth. 1999. Paths Toward Democracy. The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crouch, Harold. 2007. The Army and Politics in Indonesia. Jakarta: Equinox.Google Scholar
  20. Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Daily News. 2015. Turkish Gov’t Criticizes Erdogan Over Kurdish Process. March 21, 2015. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-govt-criticizes-erdogan-over-kurdish-process.aspx?pageID=238&nID=79989&NewsCatID=338. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  22. Daloglu, Tulin. 2013. Talks With Öcalan Offer Slim Hope for Turkey-PKK Deal. Al Monitor, January 2013. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/ar/originals/2013/01/kurds-pkk-ocalan.html. Accessed 15 May 2016.
  23. Dunleavy, Patrick. 1991. Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Models in Political Science. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  24. Findley, Carter. 2010. Turkey, Islam, Nationalism, and Modernity: A History, 1789–2007. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Geddes, Barbara. 1999. What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years? Annual Review of Political Science 2 (115–44): 129.Google Scholar
  26. Global Fire Power. Database Online Resource. http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  27. Green, Donald P., and Ian Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hadiz, Vedi. 2003. Reorganizing Political Power in Indonesia: A Reconsideration of So-called ‘Democratic Transitions’. The Pacific Review 16 (4): 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Indonesia. Current Data on the Indonesian Military Elite. April 2008–September 2013. Southeast Asia Program Publications at Cornell University, No. 98 (October 2014): 91–139.Google Scholar
  30. Indonesian National Armed Forces. US Data Base. http://datab.us/i/Indonesian%20military. Accessed 27 Apr 2016.
  31. Jemadu, Aleksisu. 2006. Democratization, the Indonesian Armed Forces and the Resolving of the Aceh Conflict. In Verandah of Violence, ed. Anthony Reid, 272–292. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mietzner, Marcus. 2006. The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance. Washington: East-West Center.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2014. The President, the ‘Deep State’ and Policy Making in Post-Suharto Indonesia: A Case Study of the Deliberation of the Civil Service Act. Report for the Partnership on Governance Reform. Jakarta: Kemitraan.Google Scholar
  34. Miller, Michelle Ann. 2009. Rebellion and Reform in Indonesia. Jakarta’s Security and Autonomy Policies in Aceh. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Öktem, Kerem. 2011. Turkey Since 1989: Angry Nation. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  36. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rabasa, Angel, and John Haseman. The Military and Democracy in Indonesia. Challenges, Politics and Power. RAND, National Security Research Division, 2002.Google Scholar
  38. Reuters. 2015. Turkish Leader’s Son Denies Russian Allegations of Islamic State Trade. December 8, 2015. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-turkey-russia-idUSKBN0TR15I20151208. Accessed 15 May 2016.
  39. Romano, David. 2014. The Long Road Toward Kurdish Accommodation in Turkey: The Role of Elections and International Pressures. In Democratization and Ethnic Minorities: Conflict or Compromise? ed. Jacques Bertrand and Oded Haklai. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Serhun Al. 2015. Kurds, State Elites, and Patterns of Nationhood in Iraq and Turkey. In Rethinking Nation and Nationalism, Project on the Middle East and Political Science, POMPES studies n. 14, June 2, 2015, p. 6.Google Scholar
  41. SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/milex_database. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  42. Slater, Dan. 2004. Indonesia’s Accountability Trap: Party Cartels and Presidential Power after Democratic Transition. Indonesia 78: 61–92.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 2010. Ordering Power. Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Söyler, Mehtap. 2015. The Turkish Deep State: State Consolidation, Civil-Military Relations and Democracy. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  45. Tekdemir, Omer, and Oghuzan Goksel. 2015. A Turbulent Turkey in a Region in Turmoil. Open Democracy, September 17, 2015. https://www.opendemocracy.net/arab-awakening/omer-tekdemir-o%C4%9Fuzhan-g%C3%B6ksel/turbulent-turkey-in-region-in-turmoil. Accessed 15 May 2016.
  46. The National. 2016. Turkey Arrests 32,000 People in Coup Probe. September 28, 2016. http://www.thenational.ae/world/europe/turkey-arrests-32000-people-in-coup-probe. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  47. Wedel, Janine R. 2009. Shadow Elite. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  48. Weingast, Barry R. 1997. The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. The American Political Science Review 91 (2): 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Woischnik, Jan, and Philipp Müller. 2013. Islamic Parties and Democracy in Indonesia. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung International Reports (10): 59–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurizio Geri
    • 1
  1. 1.ACT-NATONorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations