Research Design

  • Maurizio Geri
Part of the Minorities in West Asia and North Africa book series (MWANA)


This chapter discusses the ethodology of the research conducted for this book. The methodological approach is a qualitative analysis of case studies. There are several reasons for using qualitative analysis for this research. First of all, case studies are suitable for understanding the falsifiability of a theory because of its in-depth analysis. Furthermore, the research design is based on the “most similar systems” (Miller criteria) and on “process tracing” to elucidate the causal chain between the independent variables and the outcome. The chapter also explains the choice of the two case studies along with the selection criteria, which include above all ethnic but not religious heterogeneity, a common constitutional secularism, a recent history of democratization with a unique path to its attainment, and an armed independence struggle for both national independence and ethnic minority independence. Finally, the chapter describes the causal mechanism in the research with the four main hypotheses.


  1. Akturk, Sener. 2015. Religion and Nationalism Contradictions of Islamic Origins and Secular Nation-Building. Turkey Algeria and Pakistan. Social Science Quarterly 96 (3): 778–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Qurtuby, Sumanto. 2015. Interethnic Violence, Separatism and Political Reconciliation in Turkey and Indonesia. India Quarterly 71 (2): 126–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, Alberto, Arnaud Devleeschauwer, William Easterly, Sergio Kurlat, and Romain Wacziarg. 2003. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth 8: 155–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aslan, Senem. 2015. Different Faces of Turkish Islamic Nationalism. In Rethinking Nation and Nationalism, Project on the Middle East and Political Science, POMPES studies n. 14, June 2, 2015, p. 10.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, Andrew. 2010. Process Tracing and Causal Inference. In Rethinking Social Inquiry, ed. Henry Brady and David Collier. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. Boesler, Matthew. 2013. The Economist Who Invented The BRICs Just Invented A Whole New Group of Countries: The MINTs. Business Insider, November 13, 2013. Accessed 2 Apr 2016.
  7. Cashmore, Ellis. 2004. Encyclopedia or Race and Ethnic Studies. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cesari, Jocelyn. 2014. The Awakening of Muslim Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2015. Religion and Politics: What Does God Have To Do with It? Religion 6 (4): 1330–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CIA. World Factbook. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  11. Collier, David. 1993. The Comparative Method. In Political Science: The State of Discipline II, ed. Ada W. Finifter. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  12. Democracy Ranking Association. The Democracy Ranking 2015. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  13. Esposito, John, Tamara Sonn, and John O. Voll. 2015. Islam and Democracy After the Arab Spring. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Freedom House. Freedom in the World 2017. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  15. Geertz, Clifford. 1968. Islam Observed; Religious Development in Morocco and Indonesia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. George, Alexander, and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Global Peace Index Report. 2017. Institute for Economics and Peace. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  18. Hefner, Robert. 2000. Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Joshua, Castellino, and Kathleen Cavanaugh. 2013. Minority Rights in the Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mahoney, James, and Gary Goertz. 2006. A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Political Analysis 14: 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin, Eric. 2012. Goldman Sachs’s MIST Topping BRICs as Smaller Markets Outperform. Bloomberg Business, August 7, 2012. Accessed 2 Apr 2016.
  23. Mill, John Stuart. 2002. A System of Logic. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific.Google Scholar
  24. Minorities at Risk Dataset, MAR. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  25. Peoples Under Threat, Minority Rights Group. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  26. Pew Research Center. The World’s Muslims: Unity and Diversity. Chapter 1: Religious Affiliation, 2012. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  27. ———. Mapping the Global Muslim Population. Report 2009. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  28. Pisani, Elizabeth. 2015. Indonesia, Etc.: Exploring the Improbable Nation. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  29. Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  30. The Economist Group. The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index 2017. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  31. The World Bank. World Data. Accessed 30 Sept 2017.
  32. Van Bruinessen, Martin. 2014. Secularism, Islamism and Muslim intellectualism in Turkey and Indonesia: Some Comparative Observations. In Ketika Makkah Menjadi, Las Vegas: Agama, ed. Mirza Tirta Kusuma. Jakarta: Gramedia.Google Scholar
  33. Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurizio Geri
    • 1
  1. 1.ACT-NATONorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations