Abstract
The potential use of upcoming measureme has motivated research on preview control to improve set-point tracking and disturbance rejection beyond that achievable via conventional feedback control. Such preview controllers, typically based upon model predictive control (MPC) for its constraint handling properties, could potentially introduce an additional feedback loop that therefore alters the closed-loop dynamics of the existing feedback compensator. This can result in a deterioration of the nominal robustness properties (The robustness property here implies the robust stability margin, that is a generalisation of the gain and phase margins for multi-input-multi-output systems.) and performance of the existing closed-loop. Therefore, the aim of this chapter is to formulate a modular MPC layer on top of a given output-feedback controller, with a view to retaining the nominal closed-loop robustness and frequency-domain properties of the latter. And a key result is derived that proves that the proposed modular MPC layer for handling the advance knowledge impacts upon the existing closed-loop system if and only if constraint violations are expected. The separable nature of the proposed control structure enables clear and transparent quantification of the benefits gained by using preview control and constraint handling, beyond that of the underlying feedback compensator.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The robustness property here implies the robust stability margin, that is a generalisation of the gain and phase margins for multi-input-multi-output systems.
References
Boyd, S., El Ghaoui, L., Feron, E., & Balakrishnan, V. (1994). Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Carrasco, D. S., & Goodwin, G. C. (2011a). Feedforward model predictive control. Annual Reviews in Control, 35(2), 199–206.
Carrasco, D. S., & Goodwin, G. C. (2011b). Preview and feedforward in model predictive control: A preliminary robustness analysis. In IFAC World Congress (Vol. 18, pp. 185–190).
Clarke, D., Mohtadi, C., & Tus, P. (1987). Generalized predictive control–Part I. The basic algorithm. Automatica, 23(2), 137–148.
Dughman, S., & Rossiter, J. (2015). A survey of guaranteeing feasibility and stability in MPC during target changes. In IFAC ADCHEM 2015.
Gilbert, E., & Tan, K. (1991). Linear systems with state and control constraints: The theory and application of maximal output admissible sets. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 36(9), 1008–1020.
Goodwin, G., Carrasco, D., & Mayne, D. (2011). Preview and feedforward in model predictive control: Conceptual and design issues. In IFAC World Congress (pp. 5555–5560).
Limon, D., Alvarado, I., Alamo, T., & Camacho, E. (2008). MPC for tracking piecewise constant references for constrained linear systems. Automatica, 44(9), 2382–2387.
Muske, K. R., & Rawlings, J. B. (1993). Model predictive control with linear models. AIChE Journal, 39, 262–287.
Pannocchia, G., & Rawlings, J. B. (2003). Disturbance models for offset-free model predictive control. AIChE Journal, 49(2), 426–437.
Pluymers, B., Rossiter, J., Suykens, J., & De Moor, B. (n.d.). The efficient computation of polyhedral invariant sets for linear systems with polytopic uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference (pp. 804–809). IEEE.
Rawlings, J. B., Bonné, D., Jørgensen, J. B., Venkat, A. N., & Jørgensen, S. B. (2008). Unreachable setpoints in model predictive control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 53(9), 2135–2141.
Rossiter, J. A. (2003). Model-based predictive control: A practical approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Rossiter, J. A., & Grinnell, B. G. (1995). Extended input horizon generalized predictive control—A GPC algorithm with better tracking. In 3rd IEEE Symposium on New Directions in Control and Automation. Cyprus.
Rossiter, J. A., & Grinnell, B. G. (1996). Improving the tracking of generalized predictive control controllers. In Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers.
Rossiter, J. A., Kouvaritakis, B., & Rice, M. J. (1998). A numerically robust state-space approach to stable-predictive control strategies. Automatica, 34(1), 65–73.
Rossiter, J. A., & Valencia-Palomo, G. (2009). Feed forward design in MPC. In European Control Conference.
Scokaert, P. O. M., & Rawlings, J. B. (1999). Feasibility issues in linear model predictive control. AIChE Journal, 45(8), 1649–1659.
Shead, L., Muske, K., & Rossiter, J. (2008). Conditions for which MPC fails to converge to the correct target. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 41(2), 6968–6973.
Shead, L. R. E., Muske, K. R., & Rossiter, J. A. (2010). Conditions for which linear MPC converges to the correct target. Journal of Process Control, 20(10), 1243–1251.
Valencia-Palomo, G., Rossiter, J. A., & López-Estrada, F. R. (2014). Improving the feedforward compensator in predictive control for setpoint tracking. ISA Transactions, 53(3), 755–766.
Wang, L., & Rossiter, J. A. (2008). Disturbance rejection and set-point tracking of sinusoidal signals using generalized predictive control. In Proceedings of CDC (Vol. 1, pp. 4079–4084).
Zeilinger, M. N., Morari, M., & Jones, C. N. (2014). Soft constrained model predictive control with robust stability guarantees. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 59(5), 1190–1202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lio, W. (2018). Feed-Forward Model Predictive Control Design Based upon a Feedback Controller. In: Blade-Pitch Control for Wind Turbine Load Reductions. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75532-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75532-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75531-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75532-8
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)