Skip to main content

Compulsion and Resistance: Origins of the Russian Research Tradition and Political Economy of the Special

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Re-Examining the History of the Russian Economy
  • 320 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the evolution of economics as a form of research where the tension between foreign influence—as higher status and a source of skills and knowledge for Russia—and domestic political needs was central. Russian economics was torn between claims to universality (i.e. a method for seeking Truth outside historical experiences) and local historical experiences, both of which influences questions, methods, and aims. The creation of a “national school” of economics in Russia was driven by desires of state officials and intellectuals oriented to Russia itself (e.g. Slavophiles) to create a science to address Russia’s economic issues on its own terms, without subordinating Russian intellectual thought to foreign fields. The influence of German economics—not only as an intellectual for in itself, but also as concrete actors bringing their own ideas to Russia—was clear, but Russian economists applied new knowledge to their own context to an economics attuned to their own institutions and political culture. Russian economics, like Russian identity, has been torn between affinity with Europe and a sense of belonging to a European intellectual community, and a desire for status from uniqueness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter, I equate the ethnic label “Russian” (russkii) and the legal label “Russian” (rossiiskii) when I refer to schools of economic thought. Strictly speaking, there are differences between the two, given the complex ethnic composition of the country’s population and possible discrepancies between different cultures. While this point warrants its own discussion, for sake of space, I elide it here. Note that I also take for granted the idea of a “nation” and “national,” when nations are political constructions. A national school of economic thought presumes a “nation,” and nation-building is obviously related to economy-building and theory-building. But this is a complex theme for another work.

  2. 2.

    Again, it might be possible to incorporate contextual specifics (of social space and time) into a general theory, as a set of variables. However, if context matters in this way, then those particular variables and causal relations are no longer invariant. Prediction would only work if those contextual specifics themselves are fairly constant. So, while some issues might be addressed invariant “laws” (e.g. regarding inflation), others might not (e.g. the effect of state activity in the economy).

  3. 3.

    Thus, the process of creating a Russian school of economic thought paralleled the process of designing industrial policies: “latecomers” could copy earlier modernizers (Gerschenkron 1962).

  4. 4.

    Zweynert (2008) chose 1805 as the starting point of his analysis, noting that in this year the first textbook on political economy was prepared by Christian von Schlözer—dismissing earlier originality.

  5. 5.

    Ministers of Finance for the Russian Empire who were German by birth included E. F. Kankrin, P. F. Brokh, M. Kh. Reitern, S. A. Greig, N. Kh. Bunge, S. Iu. Witte , and P. L. Bark.

  6. 6.

    From its creation in 1725 up to the end of the eighteenth century, the Academy of Sciences was made up of more foreigners than Russians. In 1799, of 111 members of the Academy, 76 were foreigners, of whom 68 were Germans. Only 26 were Russian. Russians began to dominate the Academy only in the second half of the nineteenth century.

  7. 7.

    The first departments of political economy were created at Moscow University and Kazan University (1804), and then at St. Petersburg University (1819).

  8. 8.

    As an example, Marx’s Das Kapital enjoyed great success in Russia, which Marx himself noted in a letter to Sorge in November 1880. In Russia he was “more read and appreciated than anywhere else…” (Marx and Engels 1964: 380). At the same time, during Marx’s life, Kapital was not translated into English, even though he wrote it while living in Great Britain and using Britain as his empirical case. The first volume was translated into Russian in 1872, and it was his first translation into a foreign language. The English edition appeared only in 1886 after his death (1883).

  9. 9.

    Cf. Bolshaia biographicheskaia entsiklopediia (Moscow, 2009), at http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_biography/.

Works Cited

  • Abalkin, L.I. 2003. Ocherki istorii rossiiskoi ekonomicheskoi mysli. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alekseeva, E.V. 2007. Diffuziia evropeiskikh innovatsii v Rossii (XVIII–nachalo XX v.). Moscow: Rosspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, V. 2005. A History of Economic Russian Thought. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 2005. Sotsialnoe prostranstsvo: polia i praktika. Moscow: Institut eksperimentalnoi psikhologii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpi, G. 2012. Dostoevskii—ekonomist. Ocherki po sotsiologii literatury. Moscow: Falanster.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Istoriia russkogo marksizma. Moscow: Common Place.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. 2013. Arkhitektura rynkov: ekonomicheskaia sotsiologiia kapitalisticheskikh obshchestv v XXI veke. Moscow: Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, Liah. 1992. Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iakovets, Iu.V. 2003. Rossiiskie ekonomicheskie shkoly. Moscow: MFK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iakutin, Iu.V. 2010. Rossiiskaia shkola sotsialno-ekonomicheskoi mysli: istoki, printsipy, perspektivy. Moscow: Ekonomicheskaia gazeta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilin, I.A. 1992. O russkoi idee. In Russkaia ideia, ed. M.A. Maslin, 436–443. Moscow: Respublika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istoriia russkoi politicheskoi mysli, vol. 1. 1955. Mosacow: Politizdat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kireevskii, I.V. 2007. Dukhovnye osnovy russkoi zhizni. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshkov, V.N. 1855. Iz vospominanii 12-ro ianvaria 1855 goda: Uchebno-literaturnye stati professorov i prepodavatelei Imperatorskogo Moskovskogo Universiteta, izdannye po sluchaiu ego stoletnego iubileia. Moscow: Universitetskaia tipografiia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1964. Sochineniia. Vol. 34. Moscow: Politizdat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokidchenko, M.G., and E.N. Kalmyzhkova. 2003. Istoriki ekonomicheskoi mysli v Rossii: V. V. Sviatlovskii, M. I. Tugan-Baranovskii, V. Ia. Zheleznov. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryazanov, V. 1998. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii. Reformy i rossiiskoe khoziaistvo v XIX–XX vv. St. Petersburg: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Russkaia shkola ekonomicheskoi mysli: universalno-vseobshchee i natsionalno-osobennoe. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriia Ekonomika 3: 66–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shtein, V.M. 1948. Ocherki razvitiia russkoi obshchestvenno-ekonomicheskoi mysli XIX–XX vekov. Leningrad: Leningradskii gosudarstvennye universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, O. 1993. The Decline of the West. Form and Actuality. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. 1989. Communities of Discourse. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweynert, Joachin. 2008. Eine Geschichte des ökonomischen Denkens in Rußland 1805–1905. Marburg: Metropolis Verbag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ryazanov, V. (2018). Compulsion and Resistance: Origins of the Russian Research Tradition and Political Economy of the Special. In: Hass, J. (eds) Re-Examining the History of the Russian Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75414-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75414-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75413-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75414-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics