Advertisement

Ethics, Policy, and Risk Assessment of the Cotopaxi Volcanic Crisis in Ecuador—Vulnerable Society Versus Unprepared Volcanic Monitoring Staff and Authorities

  • Theofilos Toulkeridis
  • Ana Jacome
  • Fernando Mato
Chapter
Part of the The Latin American Studies Book Series book series (LASBS)

Abstract

Risk monitoring, knowledge management, and communication skills play a key role in managing volcanic crises, and being the scientific knowledge, the transversal Achilles heel in risk perception, decision-making, general politics, and the main generator of confidence in population. During this study, we analyzed the ethical behavior of the policy in the risk management carried out in Ecuador on the Cotopaxi volcano after its most recent reactivation in 2015. This analysis clearly demonstrates evidence of both an inadequate risk assessment and an inadequate transmission of information to the authorities and afterward to the population, which led to loss of lives and a complicated social and economic situation throughout the affected zones. As a result of this study, important lessons were extracted and are provided here with the aim to prepare technicians and authorities to manage future volcanic crises in a more adequate form.

Keywords

Ecuadorian ethics Policy and risk assessment Volcanic crisis False alert Inadequate planning Cotopaxi volcano 

References

  1. Aguilera E, Pareschi MT, Rosi M, Zanchetta G (2004a) Risk from lahars in the northern valleys of Cotopaxi Volcano (Ecuador). Nat Hazards 33(2):161–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilera E, Yépez W, Toulkeridis T (2004b) Early alert system for lahars of the volcano Cotopaxi (Ecuador). In: IAVCEI general assembly 2004, Pucón, ChileGoogle Scholar
  3. Annen C, Wagner JJ (2003) The impact of volcanic eruptions during the 1990s. Nat Hazard Rev 4:169–175Google Scholar
  4. Arellano S, Hall M, Samaniego P, LePennec J-L, Ruiz A, Molina I, Yepes H (2008) Degassing patterns of Tungurahua volcano (Ecuador) during the1999–2006 eruptive period, inferred from remote spectroscopic measurements of SO2 emissions. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 176:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aspinall W (2010) A route to more tractable expert advice. Nature 463:294–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atman CJ, Bostrom A, Fischhoff B, Morgan MG (1994) Designing risk communications: completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes, Part I. Risk Anal 14:779–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barberi F, Coltelli M, Frullani A, Rosi M, Almeida E (1995) Chronology and dispersal characteristics of recently (last 5000 years) erupted tephra of Cotopaxi (Ecuador): implications for long-term eruptive forecasting. J Volc Geothermal Res 69(3):217–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barclay J, Haynes K, Mitchell T, Solana C, Teeuw R, Darnell A, Crosweller HS, Cole P, Pyle D, Lowe C, Fearnley C (2008) Framing volcanic risk communication within disaster risk reduction: finding ways for the social and physical sciences to work together. Geol Soc London, Spec Publ 305(1):163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biass S, Bonadonna C (2013) A fast GIS-based risk assessment for tephra fallout: the example of Cotopaxi volcano, Ecuador-Part I: probabilistic hazard assessment. Nat Hazards 65:477–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cerca M, Toulkeridis T, Concha-Dimas A (2005) First results about the structural setting and emplacement model of the Cotopaxi Volcanic Complex, Ecuador. In: Chapman conference on the effects of basement, structure, and stratigraphic heritages on Volcano behaviour, Taal Volcano, Tagaytay City, Philippines, 36Google Scholar
  11. Cox LAT (2012) Confronting deep uncertainties in risk analysis. Risk Anal 32:1607–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donovan A, Oppenheimer C, Bravo M (2012a) Social studies of volcanology: knowledge generation and expert advice on active volcanoes. Bull Volc 74:677–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donovan A, Oppenheimer C, Bravo M (2012b) Science at the policy interface: volcano-monitoring technologies and volcanic hazard management. Bull Volc 74:1005–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doyle EE, McClure J, Johnston DM, Paton D (2014) Communicating likelihoods and probabilities in forecasts of volcanic eruptions. J Volc Geothermal Res 272:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ecuadorian Presidency (2015) Presidente de la República firmó el Decreto 755 (DECRETO). http://www.presidencia.gob.ec/presidente-de-la-republica-firmo-el-decreto-755-decreto/
  16. El Comercio 08/09/2015 (2015) Las autoridades de Cotopaxi tardaron 4 horas en el simulacro de cambio de alerta de amarilla a naranja. http://www.elcomercio.com/actualidad/cuatro-horas-simulacion-autoridades-cotopaxi.html
  17. El Telégrafo 10/12/2015 (2015) Parque Nacional Cotopaxi se reabre para visitantes. http://www.telegrafo.com.ec/regionales/regional-centro/item/parque-nacional-cotopaxi-se-reabre-para-visitantes.html
  18. Freymuller JT, Kellogg JN, Vega V (1993) Plate motions in the north Andean region. J Geophys Res 98:21853–21863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcia-Aristizabal A, Kumagai H, Samaniego P, Mothes P, Yepes H, Monzier M (2007) Seismic, petrologic, and geodetic analyses of the 1999 dome-forming eruption of Guagua Pichincha volcano, Ecuador. J Volcanol Geoth Res 161:333–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall M, Mothes PA (2008) The rhyolitic–andesitic eruptive history of Cotopaxi volcano. Ecuador Bull Volcanol 70:675–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall ML, Samaniego P, Le Pennec JL, Johnson JB (2008) Ecuadorian Andes volcanism: a review of Late Pliocene to present activity. J Volc Geothermal Res 176(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haynes K, Barclay J, Pidgeon N (2008) The issue of trust and its influence on risk communication during a volcanic crisis. Bull Volc 70(5):605–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hiltz SR, Diaz P, Mark G (2011) Introduction: social media and collaborative systems for crisis management. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact (TOCHI) 18(4):18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IGEPN (2015a) Daily reports of Cotopaxi volcano in 2015 of the Instituto Geofísico de la Escuela Politécnica Nacional. http://www.igepn.edu.ec/informes-volcanicos/cotopaxi/coto-diarios/coto-d-2015
  25. IGEPN (2015b) Special reports of Cotopaxi volcano in 2015 of the Instituto Geofísico de la Escuela Politécnica Nacional. http://www.igepn.edu.ec/informes-volcanicos/cotopaxi/coto-especiales/coto-e-2015
  26. Kumagai H, Nakano M, Maeda T, Yepes H, Palacios P, Ruiz M, Arrais S, Vaca M, Molina I, Yamashima T (2010) Broadband seismic monitoring of active volcanoes using deterministic and stochastic approaches. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth (1978–2012) 115(B8)Google Scholar
  27. La Condamine Ch. Marie (1751) Diario del Viaje al Ecuador, republ. In: 1986, Quito, Publitécnica, 221 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. La Hora 04/08/2015 (2015) Descoordinación en análisis del volcán Cotopaxi. http://www.lahora.com.ec/index.php/noticias/show/1101849002/-1/home/goRegional/Cotopaxi
  29. Marti J (2015) Scientific communication of uncertainty during volcanic emergencies. In: Loughlin SC, Sparks RSJ, Brown SK, Jenkins SF, Vye-Brown C (eds) Global volcanic hazards and risk, Cambridge University Press, 371 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Municipality of Rumiñahui (2015) Contingency plan of an eventual eruption of the volcano Cotopaxi. Sangolquí, Ecuador, p 44Google Scholar
  31. Naranjo JL, Sigurdsson H, Carey SN, Fritz W (1986) Eruption of the Nevado del Ruiz volcano, Colombia, on 13 November 1985: tephra fall and lahars. Science 233(4767):961–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Newhall C, Aramaki S, Barberi F, Blong R, Calvache M, Cheminee JL, Punongbayan R, Siebe C, Simkin T, Sparks RSJ, Tjetjep W (1999) Professional conduct of scientists during volcanic crises. Bull Volc 60:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Padilla O (2017) Horizontal and vertical evacuation models based on an eventual eruption of Cotopaxi volcano. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Alcala, SpainGoogle Scholar
  34. Pierson TC, Wood NJ, Driedger CL (2014) Reducing risk from lahar hazards: concepts, case studies, and roles for scientists. J Appl Volcanol 3(16):1–25Google Scholar
  35. Pistolesi M (2008) Historical analysis and stratigraphy of the post-XII century pyroclastic activity at Cotopaxi volcano, Ecuador. Implication for lahar hazard assessment. Plinius 34:131–138Google Scholar
  36. Pistolesi M, Cioni R, Rosi M, Aguilera E (2014) Lahar hazard assessment in the southern drainage system of Cotopaxi volcano, Ecuador: results from multiscale lahar simulations. Geomorphology 207:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reischmann T, Toulkeridis T, Aguillera E (2003) Re-awakening of a Volcano: The 3. November 2002 eruption of El Reventador, NE Ecuador. In: EGS-AGU-EUG joint assembly, Abstracts from the meeting held in Nice, France, 6–11 April 2003, Vol 1, abstract #5341Google Scholar
  38. Rodriguez F, Toulkeridis T, Padilla O, Mato F (2015) Economic risk assessment of Cotopaxi volcano Ecuador in case of a future lahar emplacement. Submitted to Nat Hazards RevGoogle Scholar
  39. Sigurdsson H, Carey S (1986) Volcanic disasters in Latin America and the 13th November 1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz volcano in Colombia. Disasters 10(3):205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smithsonian Institution (1999–2015) Volcano data, weekly and monthly reports. Global Volcanism Program. http://www.nmnhwww.si.edu/
  41. Snailman R (1978) Sangay survived: the story of the Ecuador volcano disaster 1st UK ed. Hutchinson, London: The Random House Group Limited, p 192Google Scholar
  42. Sodiro L (1877) Relación Sobre la Erupción del Cotopaxi Acaecida el Día 26 de Junio, de 1877, Quito, Imprenta Nacional, Ecuador, 40 ppGoogle Scholar
  43. Stein S, Geller RJ (2012) Communicating uncertainties in natural hazard forecasts. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 93:361–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tanguy JC, Ribiére Ch, Scarth A, Tjetjep WS (1998) Victims from volcanic eruptions: a revised database. Bull Volcanol 60:137–144Google Scholar
  45. Tobin GA, Whiteford LM (2002) Community resilience and volcano hazard: the eruption of Tungurahua and evacuation of the faldas in Ecuador. Disasters 26:28–48Google Scholar
  46. Toulkeridis T, Zach I (2017) Wind directions of volcanic ash-charged clouds in Ecuador – Implications for the public and flight safety. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risks 8(2):242–256Google Scholar
  47. Toulkeridis T (2005) Cotopaxi—Una belleza fatal. Documentary, 56 minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Q86QpUuNxE&list=PL4c1zlw7c_2uLL1phcTpH66rEehjxA9n7
  48. Toulkeridis T (2006) New, efficient educative prevention for Ecuador’s volcano Cotopaxi. In: Cities on volcanoes 4 (COV4), Quito, Ecuador: 142Google Scholar
  49. Toulkeridis T (2010) Volcanic hazard preparedness in Ecuador. In: Cities on volcanoes 6 (COV6), Tenerife, Spain, p 228 (May–June 2010)Google Scholar
  50. Toulkeridis T (2013) Volcanes Activos Ecuador. Santa Rita, Quito, Ecuador, 152 ppGoogle Scholar
  51. Toulkeridis T, Buchwaldt R, Addison A (2007) When volcanoes threaten, scientists warn. Geotimes 52:36–39Google Scholar
  52. United Nations (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. United Nations, 37 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Visschers VH, Meertens RM, Passchier WW, De Vries NN (2009) Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature. Risk Analysis 29:267–287Google Scholar
  54. Whymper E (1892) Travels amongst the Great Andes of the Equator. In: New edition with introduction and photographs by McIntyre L, Smith GM (1987) Peregrine Smith Books, Salt Lake CityGoogle Scholar
  55. Wolf T (1878) Memoria Sobre el Cotopaxi y su Ultima Erupción Acaecida el 26 de Junio de 1877, Guayaquil, Imprenta de El Comercio, Ecuador, 48 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theofilos Toulkeridis
    • 1
  • Ana Jacome
    • 2
  • Fernando Mato
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad de Las Fuerzas Armadas ESPESangolquíEcuador
  2. 2.Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales FLACSOQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations